Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CiscoWorks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 01:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CiscoWorks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete not WP:NOTABLE LES 953 (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Delete. Not wp:notable, and is just sales material; so there would be no article content once sales material is removed. North8000 (talk) 16:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very Strong Keep. One of the most popular, if not the most popular, Network Management Systems of all time. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 16:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That may be so but the article does not mention it. It does not need its own page. A mention at the Cisco page is all that is required or, as other editors suggest elsewhere. a generic Cisco routers page. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: was not helpful for my project and research ,seemed to be an advertising gimmick! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Machismo500 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Non-Notable product, no references nor in-line references. Written in only marketing bullets. Non-informative, technically vague, seems marketing once again. Wikipedia is not a product catalog. 99.202.38.179 (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - I didn't see any notable coverage on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 19:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Stub. Plenty of coverage in technical publications available on the Internet -> WP:NOTABLE. A proper article can be written. For example see:
Cisco flips the switch on CiscoWorks 2000. Musich, Paula, PC Week. Vol. 15, no. 39, pp. 113-113. 28 Sept. 1998 .

Duffy, Jim. CiscoWorks gets Windows version. Network World. 9 Jan 1995. Marokwitz (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not WP:NOTABLE not Prose refs are press releases not WP:42 coverage. 74.82.64.144 (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.