Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Le

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Le (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesnt comply to Wikipedia's notability guideline, and hasnt for 5 years. Created by username: Valuptiious with intent to "kiss Chris Le in the bottom" as stated by his post on the talk page. DeviantAttitude (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should add to why this page should be deleted. Most of the edits, along with the current design of the page were by IP's based on Utah, in and around the city of birth and residence of Chris Le. A simple IP location in various websites lists the same results, although I can concede those website are not entirely reliable. Calling "Juarez 2045" a major SciFi film is like calling a movie like "The Room" good. The movie in itself is not notable enough to even warrant its own page, but it hasnt released so I'll give the article time to curate. A few more things. None of those articles are by major media sources, in fact they are the first articles you can find with most of them being in the second page of the google search. Second, user Thevoid714's account is also recently created and it has only posted in this page, it was also used to comment mere 15 minutes after the last edit on the Chris Le page. To finalise this page has suffered from some kind of attacks against criticism, like this very page and the talk page being completely blank. I restored the talk page, while someone else restored this one. DeviantAttitude (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.