Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiksaura Bazar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. and Move to Chiksaura Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chiksaura Bazar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. No reason to believe that a small village market is notable, no RS that I can find that meet the GNG JMWt (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, India, and Bihar. JMWt (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No credible claim of notability, no references, and all I can see on the Web is mirror sites.TheLongTone (talk) 11:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is there evidence that the village, at least, exists? WP:GEOLAND has a lower bar and this may pass that notability guideline. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 16:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move. After reviewing, there is a village called Chiksaura, which is legally recognized and populated meeting WP:GEOLAND. Here is a government document about the village and the village exists on Google Maps and Open Street Map. The article should be moved to Chiksaura, as that is the WP:COMMONNAME and the article is now rewritten slightly to refer to the market village rather than the village market. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 17:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and then Move to Chicksaura, as suggested by EmeraldRange, based on the government source they discovered, it now meets WP:GEOLAND. However, virtually all the existing information should be removed since it is not well-sourced.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.