Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CampDoodles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CampDoodles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe a summer camp for k-6 is inherently notable, and the refs dont show that its spefically notable. I know that outcomes for k-9 schools is almost always to delete, but i dont know if summer camps are treated the same way. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Nothing but directory-type listings found at Google News Archive, and no significant references provided at the article. And no, the rules for schools do NOT apply to summer camps. --MelanieN (talk) 02:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Google News searches provided nothing substantial, a Google Books search provided this (mentions it was accredited by the American Camping Association) and one of the News searches here provided camp guides from the same source, Marin Independent Journal. I'm sure this is an excellent place for kids but it is not notable for Wikipedia yet. SwisterTwister talk 23:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:SET reveals very little to substantiate any policies for inclusion. Mkdw ^talk 09:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speddy Delete Unless there was/is a controversial incident at the camp of any note this should be deleted. 174.49.170.145 (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.