Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Slais

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep without prejudice to a future renomination. Already relisted twice and only a single weak keep vote. It's time to move on. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Slais

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, no reliable sources. A Google News search for "Bill Slais" came up empty. Large parts of the content aren't even supported by the given unreliable sources. Huon (talk) 23:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have run into a Twinkle-based edit conflict and someone else tagged the page for speedy deletion while I was writing the AfD rationale. Given his numerous works with more notable musicians I'm not sure Slais qualifies for speedy deletion, but I obviously wouldn't object either. Huon (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I declined the speedy for those reasons. Clearly claims significance even if he is not notable. Regards So Why 08:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - this saxophonist appears to have been notable in the pre-Internet age, young folk. I found a few Billboard articles online. Bearian (talk) 00:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.