Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar (MUD)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar (MUD)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party sources, thus failing GNG. PlusPlusDave (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of meeting notability guidelines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have tried in the past to source this (see talk page), but never been able to find any solid references. Marasmusine (talk) 10:20, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zero notability-establishing references. I've also tried to source this article and failed. —chaos5023 (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 06:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 14:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no significant coverage in reliable third party sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.