Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian corporate tax rate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing this one as a keep. If you wish to merge feel free to do so on the talk page. Thanks everyone for contributing and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australian corporate tax rate

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Copylefted to Taxation in Australia. Therefore WP:OVERLAP applies. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 08:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question May be I have missed something, but it seems you have essentially done a merge, but not included about 1/3 of the referenced material, and then asked for the original article to be deleted. Why did you not raise a merge proposal on the talk page first? Aoziwe (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this suffices as a general redirect/delete/merge discussion as these outcomes can result from the following discussion. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I still do not follow you. "these outcomes" cannot follow if you have pre-empted the "outcome"? Aoziwe (talk) 11:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at least as a redirect per WP:COPYWITHIN because a merge has taken place. Additionally the topic appears notable.----Pontificalibus 06:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pontificalibus. Bookscale (talk) 08:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It is hard to keep tax articles updated on WP (I have done several); in most cases, it is better to consolidate into the larger "head articles" rather than have individual sub-artices (and also avoids WP:FORKING). However, for sufficiantly developed sub-articles, they are fine to keep. I would be interested to hear from the creator, Enthusiast01. Britishfinance (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the Australian corporate tax rate hasn't changed for 19 years, so it should be easier than some others to maintain. Bookscale (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.