Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Microwave
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Closed because article speedy deleted as A7 (non-admin closure). - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 13:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Atlantic Microwave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the GNG, and Wikipedia is not a directory. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:39, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD:A7, doesn't indicate anything important or significant about the company. CaptainScreebo Parley! 14:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If anyone wants to A7 it, that's fine. I just didn't because of the second and third sentences in the lead. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just my take on that "it's a big company which is part of a big group" and? Doesn't demonstrate why this is significant. CaptainScreebo Parley! 16:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yeah, I understand. Even though I realize it's not policy based, I just tend to hold myself to a higher standard when it comes to tagging CSDs. Again, I have no opposition to someone else tagging it. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 16:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yeah, I understand. Even though I realize it's not policy based, I just tend to hold myself to a higher standard when it comes to tagging CSDs. Again, I have no opposition to someone else tagging it. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 16:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just my take on that "it's a big company which is part of a big group" and? Doesn't demonstrate why this is significant. CaptainScreebo Parley! 16:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If anyone wants to A7 it, that's fine. I just didn't because of the second and third sentences in the lead. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.