Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arc @ UNSW Limited (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to University of New South Wales#Student organisations. czar 20:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arc @ UNSW Limited

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

COI article for a non-notable organization (a student union) that doesn't pass GNG either. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant student union at a major university. The article has existed for over a decade with many contributors, and has been unanimously kept twice. Drmies was also the nominator the last time it was unanimously kept, so this seems to be an attempt at "if at first you don't succeed...". The COI allegation is completely baseless and seems to be a bit of mud-throwing after the failure last time around. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- User:The Drover's Wife, thanks for the note--both, the one about the earlier nomination (I had forgotten) and the shot below the belt. I do wonder what gets you so upset so quickly. Anyway, like last time you have no actual argument except for "it's notable", and the article itself is still nothing more than a combination of a description of governance and structure, with a huge section of unverified factoids unworthy of an encyclopedia. Looking at the references, you have to go to #11 before the first secondary source, and the next one--well, who knows, since the references are kind of a mess. I could challenge The Drover's Wife to produce a reference from a secondary source that discusses the club in any kind of detail, but they couldn't be bothered last time either. Drmies (talk) 22:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to University_of_New_South_Wales#Student_organisations as per the guidelines in WP:CLUB. I am not in favour of keeping in as an independent article. A 10 year old organisation is not automatically notable, neither are student unions automatically notable. The scope of a student union's activities are largely restricted to the university and usually doesn't attract enough national attention. In this case, a merge to University_of_New_South_Wales#Student_organisations would be a suitable solution. I wouldn't like to merge all the information though as I am concerned that some of the information in this article is potentially violating our WP:BLP policy. Other parts of the article reads like an information brochure. We can exclude these information.--DreamLinker (talk) 08:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete/merge cover within the university itself, as its name says its Arc at University of New South Wales. The @ symbol in the title is itself problematic,there's policy/mos somewhere thats say we dont use such symbols, even if kept it would need to renamed. Gnan garra 10:04, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to University_of_New_South_Wales#Student_organisations. I cannot find any sufficient WP:NEXIST to support WP:GNG for this subject in its own right, but it does deserve due weight attention in the context of the UNSW. Aoziwe (talk) 12:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Delete. Topic fails the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. References mostly fail WP:ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.