Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arambašići (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sarma (food). (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arambašići

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not appear to be a notable dish/recipe. Safiel (talk) 22:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Sarma (food), where arambašići are already discussed as one of the many related recipes composed of a large leaf wrapped around a filling (they simply called them stuffed grape leaves where I grew up). There are some book sources for arambašići apparent at GBooks, but not enough to make a case for a separate article, especially given the lack of content in the current version. At some point we may need to explore the relationship and demarcation between the articles for Sarma (food) and Dolma, but that's not necessary to resolve this AfD. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sarma as suggested. There are sources in its local language but no-one interested (and possibly no benefit for the project) in developing it. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sarma (food) seems the most sensible option, based on Arxiloxos's suggestion and my thoughts on the article's talk page when I contested the speedy delete. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 16:03, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We often redirect food articles to variant names, and I would follow that precedent. See also WP:CHEAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian (talk • contribs) 15:29, September 24, 2014‎

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.