Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Liu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Liu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Main notability as IMO coach, so needs independent reliable sources which talk about the subject in detail. Can't verify he passes WP:GNG or WP:PROF Solomon 7968 05:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Solomon 7968 05:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Solomon 7968 05:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] and [2] list Andy (Andrew) Liu as a Team Leader
Andy Liu also authored and translated several math competitions problem books [3], [4] and translated several math competitions problem books [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], to name just a few Victor Ivrii 12:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Ivrii (talk • contribs)
Keep. The many major national and international teaching awards he has won are probably enough for WP:PROF#C2 and #C4, and the citations for these awards provide nontrivial in-depth coverage of the subject from multiple notable organizations independent of the subject, giving him a pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- PS I restored some material to the article on a recent arrest on child pornography charges, which had been removed because the previous sourcing was insufficiently reliable for this sort of material. I found two more-reliable sources for the same incident. I'm skeptical that there is enough coverage, and enough long-term coverage, for him to pass notability via WP:PERP, but I think he's notable for other reasons and that this is an important part of his life story. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, enough references have been used to establish his notability as an academic, IMO. PK T(alk) 14:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.