Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alf Ellison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage to meet the notability guideline. Killiondude (talk) 06:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alf Ellison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman from Newington College who was on a few boards and owned some horses ADS54 talk 11:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:59, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sufficient reliable sources across a number of contexts. Google illustrates more sources that aren't in the article, including a bit of coverage in the Sydney Morning Herald not currently used. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Many areas of involvement makes Ellison notable. Castlemate (talk) 09:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I don't quite see enough here - seems to be mostly passing mentions. Possibly I'm missing something in which case happy to be corrected. Frickeg (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – All I can find are various trivial passing mentions of this guy in relation to other things. There's no significant, independent coverage to suggest he is notable enough to pass WP:GNG at all. Even the citations the author has included are mostly mere lists with no substance. Kb.au (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—fails WP:BIO. Google search gives almost nothing. I don't see an sources that would establish his notability. NikolaiHo^☎️ 04:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 08:01, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.