Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Lingwood
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Alex Lingwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This journalist lacks RS coverage that would qualify him for an article under our notability standards. Article has been tagged for notability (and needing refs) since 2009, and for being an orphan since 2010. It was created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 13:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The-Pope (talk) 09:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no significant coverage. nothing in gnews. LibStar (talk) 00:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.