Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajmel Quereshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ajmel Quereshi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:USCJN - [Magistrate judges] are.. "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider Snickers2686 (talk) 22:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Snickers2686 (talk) 22:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Maryland, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per precedent. His selection as a magistrate judge of itself does not confer notability, and his legal work prior to that selection likely is typical of other attorneys in his field. Kablammo (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject plainly does not pass WP:JUDGE or the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Article was originally created by the sockpuppet MIAJudges. User:Let'srun 01:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per above. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.