Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adekunle Olayinka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. No clear indications that sourcing or notability requirements are met; the additional sources presented in the keep !votes are similar to those already present. ^Complex/_Rational 22:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adekunle Olayinka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from UPE concerns, the articles seems to be filled with articles that are paid for. Olayinka holds the post of a special adviser to the Governor of Lagos State; which does not pass the bar for WP:NPOL. As an aspirant, sadly, Olayinka could not make it to the House of Representatives; again, fails NPOL. Neither does Olayinka meet the general notability guidelines independently. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Nigeria. Reading Beans (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Engineering. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass NPOL and the sources cited are recycled press releases. Mccapra (talk) 19:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The person lacks coverage from credible sources. Micheal Kaluba (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Generally pass GNG 102.88.36.78 (talk) 13:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly fails WP:NPOL. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Google search has multiple reliable sources from secondary independent sources.[1], [2] and [3] are enough to establish notability. 102.89.34.12 (talk) 04:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per all mentioned reasons above.- Tumbuka Arch (talk) 08:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.