Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACREM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a mixture of this AfD and WP:G11, as the page was fairly promotional in tone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ACREM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some local coverage, but I couldn't establish that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 19:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 19:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My searches revealed no coverage to meet WP:GNG, WP:ORG. MisterRandomized (talk) 05:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.