Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 cryptocurrency crash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cryptocurrency bubble. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2018 cryptocurrency crash

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established for this arbitrarily defined event. The article may as well have been called "2017 cryptocurrency spike", prices fluctuate and media will always frame it in the most dramatic way possible. That does not mean that this event was anything but a news story. Ysangkok (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cryptocurrency bubble. Basically all of the same content is already there.Citing (talk) 15:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cryptocurrency bubble. --Devokewater @ 16:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & improve The crash was notable in its own right, I think. It is certainly adequately sourced. Both this article and Cryptocurrency bubble are a little meagre and need fleshing out, but the 2018 crash was a significant event and received massive coverage. Boynamedsue (talk) 10:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cryptocurrency bubble. The specific reasons for that crash are no more than the bubble itself. I think it might prove difficult to really improve the article beyond what can be summarised there. I'd be happy if someone could prove me wrong, though, as this particular crash was rather notable. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:27, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested, per WP:CHEAP, and as a plausible search term. I would not oppose a selective merger. Bearian (talk) 17:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.