Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Rancho Santa Fe Earthquake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Rancho Santa Fe Earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An earthquake at magnitude of 0.6, if it even happened, would be unlikely to be notable, as even in the location it occurred, no one would know about it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. 0.6 corresponds to energy between a large hand grenade and small construction blast according to Richter magnitude scale#Energy release equivalents. Millions of these a year, assuming it's even real. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A sentence about a non-notable earthquake is not worth keeping. AusLondonder (talk) 22:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cannot find any coverage. It does not seem to have been noticed by anyone, understandable given how small it was. Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Failing Wikipedia:WikiProject_Earthquakes/notability_guidelines by a landslide (huehuehue). I did not even bother to look for sources, to be honest. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 14:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. DeVerm (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.