User talk:Woerich

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	A barnstar for your excellent anti-vandalism work. All hail Armok (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your great anti-vandalism work! LizardJr8 (talk) 2 April 2020

Thomas Massie

Hi, sorry about the revert on Thomas Massie. The quickest way to clear all of the pending changes (including the latest BLP violation) was to revert all, unfortunately that caught your earlier reversion as well. Schazjmd (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Schazjmd: no worries, we all make mistakes. Woerich (talk) 03:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William Adamson

Hi there. I noticed you recently reversed changes I made (before I made a proper Wikipedia account) to the William Adamson page because they "appeared non-constructive." I'm new to Wikipedia, and thus may be somewhat unfamiliar with the proper protocol for making changes, but my changes were both constructive and correct. William Adamson was not the father of William Murdoch Adamson. I know this because the latter was my great-great grandfather, and I have sources that definitively prove his father died in Kilmarnock in 1911.Skinnylittletom (talk) 23:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Skinnylittletom: Please read WP:verifiability. Woerich (talk) 03:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC) Editing to add: please see the reply I left at the article talk page and the welcome message I posted to your talk page. Woerich (talk) 03:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Get well soon!

So sorry to hear you're battling COVID. I hope it's not too horrible for you and that you feel well again soon. Schazjmd (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Woerich (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Mandel

Hi, please be careful about WP:3RR and WP:BLP. Thanks for the report, but this isn't monochrome – it's pretty grayscale. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: Thanks for letting me know. The editor started on a very aggressive POV swing and was pretty persistent about it in the edit summaries. I’ll try to be careful though. Woerich (talk) 04:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

~Swarm~ ^{sting} 00:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Swarm! Woerich (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Andrew nyr

Hello, Woerich. You have new messages at Andrew nyr's talk page.
Message added 03:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Woerich! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to notify or make it clear that I might not be very responsive to questions?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great editor

Dear Woerich, I have not known your work for long but what I have seen has been great. I noticed that you have Covid, and I just wanted to say I hope you get well soon! Thank you for helping revert vandalism with me on rc patrol!
Feel better,
Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 05:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andrew! I’ve enjoyed running into you in RC patrol these past few days (happens when I go to revert but see that you beat me to it)! Take care, and thanks again for the encouragement. Woerich (talk) 05:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About Vox (political party)

The article Vox (political party) was already specified as "right-wing to far-right" and not solely as "far-right". I'm just returning it to this previous (and correct) description. The user that modified to exclude all the other sources and specifying the party as only far-right is the one who needs to achieve consensus on that undue edit. --168.235.134.215 (talk) 02:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]