User talk:Will211
Will211, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Will211! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC) |
Icelandair service to ORD
[edit]Please stop changing to "begins". The beginning of the third paragragph says that the airline flew to Chicago in the past (during the 1970s/1980s). Also, http://airlineroute.net/2015/05/12/fi-ord-s16/ states that Icelandair served Chicago in 1988. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 07:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I have brought it up at WT:AIRPORTS, Talk:O'Hare International Airport, and at Talk:Keflavík International Airport. Let's continue the discussion at either of those talk pages. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 08:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Dilek Peninsula-Büyük Menderes Delta National Park GA nomination
[edit]
Hello there, Will211! It's Coderenius here, the main contributor to the Dilek Peninsula-Büyük Menderes Delta National Park page. I'm pleased to say that me and a fellow editor, Ssbbplayer, have addressed the concerns you outlined in the original Good Article nomination, with the changes outlined on the talk page and I've now nominated the article once again. Since you told me to leave a message on your talk page for you to review the article another time, here it is! Cheers, mate, Coderenius (☎) 19:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Coderenius, I expect to review the article sometime within the next week. I expect it will be rather quick since previous GA concerns have already been completed. Thanks! Will211 (talk) 18:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello again! I've made the changes you asked for in the sources, please take a look, and if there are any finishing touches/minor improvements that could be made prior to passing, please let me know. Thank you! 
Done Coderenius (☎) 00:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Coderenius:, the article looks good now. I will pass the article. Cheers! Will211 (talk) 00:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Will211, I've been in touch with the GA nominator, who requested that the nomination be put back into the reviewing pool. Given Good888's extended absence (over a month and a half), that's what I'll be doing. With the GA Cup underway, the fact that this will be the fifth-oldest unreviewed nomination means that a reviewer is likely to open a new review in a matter of days (if not hours). Thanks for trying to get Good888's attention, but I suspect that he or she just isn't around these days. Since you had been trying to get the review moving again, I thought I'd let you know what I was doing. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
No hurry
[edit]Goodness. Your subject line gave me a bit of a scare when I saw it on my watchlist; I thought you meant "Sorry, but your article doesn't meet GA standards." I experienced considerable relief when I read the actual message, and won't give up hope yet...
No hurry with the review; I'm all too well acquainted with how real-life stuff keeps us from getting as much Wikiwork done as we'd like. The article itself is testimony to that: I started it in October 2011, and didn't get it launched in mainspace until January 2016. Compared to that, a delay of a few weeks is trifling.
Thanks again for agreeing to review it, and I'm looking forward to your comments. — Ammodramus (talk) 23:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Will211. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The Center Line: Spring 2017
[edit]
Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter
|
|
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Will211. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Will211. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
[edit]| Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
[edit]| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors
[edit]Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.
We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 04:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
The Center Line: Fall 2023
[edit]
Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter
- Features
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 1899 Sewanee Tigers football team
[edit]1899 Sewanee Tigers football team has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)