User talk:Wexcan/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Wexcan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Eban A. Williams article
you know what your right please delete this page.Gamblerlucky (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Erica D. Williams 2/8/08
Hi
Can i put down the infobox person on my userpage. hello everybody (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- I am syaing well i like to explore sites so can i. hello everybody (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Not sure exactly what you mean, but there's nothing stopping you exploring Wikipedia. Wexcan Talk 00:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- The link is Template:Infobox Person this is i am saying check it out then reply when your done checking it out. hello everybody (talk) 00:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- This would generally be used on a mainspace article about a person (ie, a biography). Have a look at Wikipedia:Userpage, might be useful. Good luck! Wexcan Talk 00:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Wexcan! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 17:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
RFA thanks
|
Thanks
Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 74 supporting, 3 opposing, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have placed in me. —Remember the dot (talk) 18:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
Doczilla's RfA
|
Speedy deletion of Image:Innsbruck Airport terminal.JPG
A tag has been placed on Image:Innsbruck Airport terminal.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Innsbruck Airport terminal.JPG|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wexcan Talk 14:03, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Big Picture article
Hey there, when you have the chance, I'd appreciate some feedback on the Big Picture article. What specifically do you think needs to be done to it or taken out before it's Wikipedia-friendly? I've taken out biased adjectives and the like - let me know what you think. Thanks. :)
--User:jgowdey) 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Can i
- Can make a Star Wars template like that {{PAGENAME}} like this but different.--~~~~--(Gene Autry rules!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) (talk) 00
- 46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Wiki Surprise Draw
You have won the Irish Wikipedians surprise draw!! Just leave a message on my talk page to receive the prize of USD 1,000,000 or EUR 638,442.37 or GBP 505,871.414 Markreidyhp 07:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:AVIATION Newsletter Section
For what it's worth, I've added a summary of WP:Airports activity to the April 2008 Newsletter. Do with it what you wish, I will try to repeat monthly. -Canglesea (talk) 17:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Warning etiquette
I have just noticed this warning template you gave to user:potatoswatter. Just to let you know that it is the etiquette on Wikipedia not to "template" the regular users. You can expect the regulars to know the rules already and sending them a template can be seen as condescending. You are not at fault here because I don't think that is written down anywhere but it is the accepted practice. If you have a problem with a user you can (and should) still ask for an explanation but please don't use the templates. Often there is a valid explanation (in this case a simple mistake) and it is better to AGF first. Thanks. SpinningSpark 23:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Simple mistake, and likely a knee-jerk reaction since the edit, on first glance, looked very much like vandalism - do take a look. --Wexcan Talk 02:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
An exciting opportunity to get involved!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 06:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I think I redirected this at the same time as you speedied it. If you want to review the new section and decide if it still meets the qualification for CSD, feel free. :) SGGH ping! 17:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, think there was a bit of a clash there, sorry about that. The article seems to be ok, to be honest, just not terribly well written by the original creator. Wexcan Talk 17:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
I removed your CSD tag on this article as an editor had blanked the article. The article has been reverted to its pre-blanking revision. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)