User talk:TyphoonAmpil

†TyphoonAmpil's Talk Page † (Archives)
Home - Talk - Pages - Awards - Tools - Guestbook

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Color accessibility issues

Hello, @TyphoonAmpil. I noticed on your userspace headers that you use the gold color on a light pink background. I used a tool, WebAIM Contrast Checker, and it came up as fail for every option. It's best to have a darker shade on a lighter background. Your edit notice is also breaking color accessibility with just looking at it... I can hardly even see it. Change "span style="color: #FF777B" to "span style="color: #000000" so that it can be black and easier to read. Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 02:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowboygilbert I Fixed Editnotice. Ampil ^{(Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns)} 03:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userspace headers and the talk page name is still breaking color accessibility. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 05:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowboygilbert Example:

Adding Topic? Use: Reply.

Thanks. Ampil ^{(Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns)} 05:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'll fix it and give you the diffs. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 17:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1255383604 and Special:Diff/1255383563 are what I am talking about. The first are your talk page and user page headers that have a gold color as text and it should be a darker color. The edit notice looked fine before. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 17:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowboygilbert, Thanks!

Ampil ^{(Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns)} 01:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime

News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation shares ANI lawsuit updates; first admin elections appoint eleven sysops; first admin recalls opened; temporary accounts coming soon?

In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel

Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship

Gallery: Why you should take more photos and upload them

In focus: Questions and answers about the court case

Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?

Technology report: Wikimedia tech, the Asian News International case, and the ultra-rare BLACKLOCK

Humour: Man quietly slinks away from talk page argument after realizing his argument dumb, wrong

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For discovering a new variety or species of beans that were being stuffed up the nose of the English Wikipedia and taking action. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]