User talk:Touchdown Turnaround
 Archives |
|---|
|
|
And I refer you to this page http://www.users.bigpond.com/J_fersOffice/sample.htm and this page http://ospa.utdallas.edu/Publications/VIG/10plurals.htm stating if a singular possessive proper noun ends in "s" to just add the apostrophe.
Why have you changed my informations about Hellogoodbye (they have changed the name of their band) http://www.myspace.com/hellogoodbye by 90.129.3.229 (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Replied at User_talk:90.129.3.229
Excuse me but why do you remove my website link, I'm proud of my website and I think it will be very useful for people. Steve
- Replied at [[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindbergh2002 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Disruptive Edit Warning
[edit]Please refrain from your arbitrary and undiscussed reverts as you have been doing in the Stoney Point Airfield page. This is counterproductive and clearly not in the spirit for which Wikipedia was intended. If you have comments, please make them in the article's talk page prior to taking unilateral action. This has been brought to your attention on more than one occasion. Thank you for your understanding. Gladtohelp (talk) 03:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)gladtohelp
Please revisit
[edit]Please revisit Stoney Point Airfield and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoney Point Airfield. The article has gone through expansion and additional sources have been added. Thank you!--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Template:US-airport
[edit]Hi, Stifle. The change you just granted to the protected template was based on a campaign that's been going on almost exclusively by single use accounts and meat puppets that have been trying to get their new/commercial web sites in the template. Touchdown Turnaround (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- I figured that. Is there anything else I need to do? Stifle (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
US-Airport Template
[edit]Hi Touchdown Turnaround. Well it looks like you and I are the last ones standing in this debate on the US-Airport template.
Just to let you know right off the bat, though I am a SUA I do not work for any of the companies we have discussed on the US-Airport Template page. Actually, I work as an SEO Expert for a travel website, which is how I found AirNav, FlightAware, etc…
Here is my point, because Wikipedia has a high Google ranking, any site listed on Wikipedia, such as AirNav and FlightAware gets a high ranking and additional traffic. AirNav has over 3,000 links on Wikipedia, which in my opinion, is considered spamming. This is not fair to competitors to AirNav when they can not be listed in the template and can not remove AirNav from the template. I suggest making this situation fair by using government websites, such as the FAA. The External Links Guidelines say that we should try and keep external links to a minimum, which we would be following if we just use the FAA website.
To close I don’t really care what sites are being used but if you’re going to use commercial external links that give an advantage to any of them, you should at least let everyone else on the template benefit from it. If you are not then just use a government site that is not going to profit from it and be done with it.
What is your opinion? - Neilh89 (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Touchdown Turnaround. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Touchdown Turnaround. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Touchdown Turnaround. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)