Jump to content

User talk:Thesocialpro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In response to your feedback

[edit]

User:Yunshui/FBD/firstarticle

Yunshui 雲‍水 07:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thesocialpro, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Thesocialpro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Thesocialpro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Thesocialpro. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by -- Trevj (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Bookworm857158367. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of most popular given names because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Bookworm857158367 (talk) 05:27, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Thesocialpro (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah, thanks for your input, I'm not sure what else I can do to amend this article as it already cites independent and respected publications. When writing the entry I based it on an existing wikipedia entry to ensure a neutral tone of voice. Any amendments must thus be really minor I hope? Mike

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kinkreet~♥moshi moshi♥~ 20:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Thesocialpro. You have new messages at Kinkreet's talk page.
Message added 21:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Kinkreet~♥moshi moshi♥~ 21:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile!

[edit]

Nice to see you at the Teahouse! I hope you like to be here,if you have any question (s),feel free to leave me a message,and I will respond soon!


Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Carliitaeliza TALK 20:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Azimo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Libby norman 15:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!

[edit]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FinTech

[edit]

FinTech traditionally relates to financial technology, which is the conducting of financial services activities, with the end client/user being a financial institution. The term FinTech more recently has come to define the group of technology companies that are developing innovations and spear-heading change for the financial services industry.

History

[edit]

There is no agreed first reference to the term FinTech, but it was probably coined around the late 80's when the surge in electronic payment systems spread around the USA, UK, and Europe. Financial technology and the delivery methods of finance became a keyword at this point – especially since the Forex market was open 24hrs a day and required substantial knowledge of the FinTech systems available to allow trading.

Overview

[edit]

Examples of FinTech companies include PayPal which started off as a service provider for online website eBay. PayPal and electronic currency later became a staple for online shopping in the 21st century.

Europe

[edit]

In Europe, London has proved to be the hub for FinTech innovation with companies like Funding Circle, Azimo and Zopa becoming mainstream. The success of these companies has seen incubators such as Level 39 and FinTech Innovation Lab launch to develop new startups.

FinTech publishers

[edit]

There are a number of publishers which provides specialist reporting on FinTech including IntelligentHQ, Venturebeat, American Banker and Reuters.

References

[edit]
[edit]

Proposed deletion of Azimo

[edit]

The article Azimo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FinTech (October 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 09:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FinTech (October 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Becky Sayles (talk) 05:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azimo for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azimo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azimo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to argue otherwise, but please note that the main discussion venue is the linked AfD discussion, where you should post your argument. Others will read our views there, and support or oppose them, and then the closing admin will weight various opinions and votes and rule on them in a week or so. Improving the article further will, of course, help your position. Good luck, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Azimo Logo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Azimo Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at WP:FFU

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! I've looked over your request and left a comment. Please check the comment and respond at your request on the main Files for Upload page (not here). Your request will stay there for seven days and then it will be archived. Regards, --Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Azimo Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:06, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm NGPriest. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ryen McPherson— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NGPriest was here (talk | contribs) 12:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ryen McPherson

[edit]

Hi,
Sorry about that.
I'm guessing my laptop lagged while i was reverting another edit.
NGPriest was here (talk | contribs) 13:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Files for upload

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, (t) Josve05a (c) 00:16, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FinTech concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FinTech, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FinTech concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FinTech, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FinTech

[edit]

Hello, Thesocialpro. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "FinTech".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thesocialpro&oldid=1142734798"