User talk:Taw

pl:Dyskusja Wikipedysty:Taw

I'm not active these days other than an occasional minor fix, so if you want to reach me, it's better to email me at [email protected]

Old

Taw, there's a complete list of all TeX/LaTeX/AmsLaTeX symbols at http://wso.williams.edu/how/lshort2e/node61.html AxelBoldt 19:31 Jan 8, 2003 (UTC)

see my question at Wikipedia_talk:TeX_markup --user_talk:hfastedge Im sure its as simple as an argument to an imagemagick script or something...

You changed "Lower Oder Valley National Park" to "Lower Odra National Park", as well as other occurrences of the word "Oder" in several articles. That is okay by me, and I don't mind. I'm quite upset about your comment "One more user:H.J. fix". I created that article, and I am not identical with that user:H.J. person, nor do I have any sympathy with her. Please be aware, that not everyone calling a river by its German name is necessarily a Nazi. Regards -- Cordyph 17:21 Feb 15, 2003 (UTC)

Taw, why on earth did you change every reference to the Oder river to "Odra"? In case you weren't aware, we have a policy of using English name on the English Wikipedia. The English name for this river is "Oder". I fully realise that this is also the German name, but that unfortunately cannot be helped. The name "Oder" is in overwhelming use in English: every major English encyclopedia uses it, as do news organisations and even the English page on the Szczecin city website uses it.

Your assertion that these are "user:H.J. fixes" and that you're removing "German propaganda" is grossly unfair and highly POV I would say. As Cordyph above pointed out, this has nothing to do with user:H.J.'s antics, but with Wikipedia policy. You have also changed Oder-Neisse line to "Odra-Nysa line", a title virtually unknown in English. Please revert your changes. Thanks. -Scipius 00:51 Feb 17, 2003 (UTC)

Or, why don't we just wait a couple more months until the "official English name" changes to the original "ODRA" and everybody's happy? Let's look into the future!
Space Cadet 14:21 Feb 18, 2003 (UTC)

If the "official English name" agrees with user:H.J., than obviously, there is something wrong with the "official English name"!
167.83.96.20 17:51 Feb 18, 2003 (UTC)

Why are all of you talking about user:H.J.? I really become furious about this. user:H.J. wrote revanchist, right-wing propaganda. The articles cited above did not contain anything of her disgusting POV. The only "crime" committed in these articles were to use the name, which is the valid name of the river on its western side - this river is partially Polish and partially German, and the name "Oder" is the German name and not the Nazi name of the river. If someone calls this "German propaganda", he must be blinded with ultra-nationalism, as it seems to be in your case.
I repeat, that I do not mind, if we decide to call this river "Odra" on Wikipedia. You may call it whatever you want, but stop annoying the Non-user:H.J.-contributors to these articles with wrong and unfair accusations!
I have taken this subject to the mailing list, so please join us and discuss it there, and try to discuss fairly! Good night -- Cordyph 21:30 Feb 18, 2003 (UTC)

I placed a compromise proposal on the Oder/Odra talk page. Please continue the discussion there. Thank you. -- Cordyph 18:45 Feb 19, 2003 (UTC)

Hey, please don't confuse fascism with being from the United States. Some of us recognize irony in Bush's intent to disregard the U.N. so he can punish Iraq (punishing it supposedly for disregarding the U.N.) Some of us even hate imperialism, though our court-appointed "leader" doesn't want to hear about it. ^_^ Cheers, Koyaanis Qatsi

I'm not saying every American is fascist but this one who wrote that certainly was one. Taw 15:19 Feb 20, 2003 (UTC)

Ah. m (_ _) m Koyaanis Qatsi

Why is it inappropriate to move information on the People's Republic of China to the China page? 172

Hi Taw, why did you delete Arnold Schwarzeneggers Image? Did you not read the discussion page? Fantasy 15:19 30 May 2003 (UTC)

I've seen it but you can't put "fair use" images (well, it wasn't even really "fair use") into GFDL articles. Taw 16:38 2 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Image use policy does not say so. It is not yet decided, if we can or not, see "copyrighted image - may only be used under "fair use" rules". And a Book cover is "fair use" for me and Zoe, why should it not be? Fantasy 17:07 2 Jun 2003 (UTC)

It is not ok to blank the China article. Fred Bauder 22:38 12 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Taw, it was agreed after an exhaustive (and exhausting!) discussion on the w-list and various pages not to turn China into a disambigulation page. The article does need a lot of work but because of the sheer number of links and references, and because any move is guaranteed to provoke edit wars, and for a number of other reasons, that was the clear consensus reached. I thought maybe you didn't realise that. Mav put a comment to that effect explaining that on the relevant talk page and on that basis I reverted to the previous version by Fred Bauder. I hope that clears up any confusion. :-) FearÉIREANN 00:30 13 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Your input is requested at Talk:U.S. occupation of Iraq. MB 00:26 3 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Just thought I'd drop a line to say that the work you're doing on AG mapping looks great! I don't know a lot about cartography in general, but if this mapping thing happens, it would be a fantastic service to many people. Maybe it could be the start of a WikiMap thing, where it can become the main repository of maps for everything from maps of the known universe down to maps of the street and suburb I live in. Great stuff and huge potential! Neolux 19:06, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Do you consider it a good idea to edit a protected page, that is so heavily disputed? Your edit was not only affecting a typo, but one of the highly disputed parts. Just a friendly advice: reverse your edit, otherwise some of the participants could question your sysop status. This is not meant as a threat - I won't do it, but I fear, that others could. -- Baldhur 13:36, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Why are you changing Oder to Odra and Neisse to Nysa. The former are the more common english names. For example in english:

"Oder River" 4,640 [1]
"Odra River" 2,690 [2]

Maximus Rex 17:57, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Odra and Nysa are correct names in English. Oder and Niesse are just German borrowings of the Slovian name (of course German may use whatever names they want). 58 years is enough time for a switch. Taw 18:00, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)

No they are not. English uses Oder and Neisse. Polish uses the spellings you prefer. Secretlondon 18:01, Dec 7, 2003 (UTC)

I agree with Oder-Neisse. This name is in britannica online [3]. And that argument is pointless. Should we, Poles, use London instead of Londyn since over 500 years is enough time for a switch? And there is also a Vistula river that does not makes any objections from you. Are the only sin of Oder-Neisse name is it's German origin? Przepla 21:01, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Just a little note: We go through all this almost every year. In February Taw had last time the idea to change all occurrences of Odra to Oder, making comments like now ("this river is called Odra and not Oder"), not at all responding to the common sense, that a river may bear more than one name, which may both be correct. At that time we had not as many partisans as now, and it was possible to settle a compromise (see Talk:Odra). Unfortunately it did not last long. -- Baldhur 22:31, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Yes, Tomasz! The name is still Oder, not Odra. As soon as it changes we WILL redirect!

Space Cadet 15:20, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Taw - there is no consensus to delete images used with permission. As image deletion is permanent can I ask you to stop it? Secretlondon 22:15, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC)

Further, there a process for deleting copyrighted images. It is Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements. Please go via this in future. Morwen 22:17, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC)

Dolly

Undeleted. That image was fine per our current policy. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. I suggest that you do not use your sysop user rights unilaterally again. --mav

I don't know how you do things on the Polish Wikipedia, but here on en:, pages (including image pages and copyright violations) have to go through due process on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion before being deleted. Please respect this process, or I will have to revoke your sysop privileges.—Eloquence 00:47, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)

It's not like there's any doubt these were non-free images:

Maveric149 (Photo of Dolly the sheep owned by Roslin Institute obtained from http://www.roslin.ac.uk/library/ . This image "...may be used free of charge by education, public sector or non-profit making groups

Unless the freedom on Wikipedia became subject of voting, I don't feel obliged to put it there.

And I'm going to use any means necessary to keep Wikipedia free. Taw 00:59, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

While I agree with you that this particular image should not be used under the conditions given, this is also a good candidate for fair use as it is clearly historically valuable and not reproducible by other means. In any case, this matter has not been settled in consensus, and it is not for you to take any unilateral actions or use "any means necessary" to enforce your point of view.—Eloquence 01:07, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)

So far not taking any action resulted in a lot of unilateral action by those who prefer to dilute the freeness of Wikipedia. There is no consensus to upload "fair-use" images, and even less to upload those explicitely for "noncommercial use". Taw 01:13, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

That doesn't make any sense. Certainly an image that is explicitly licensed for noncommercial use is easier to defend as fair use (including for commercial use!) than one which is copyrighted without any permission whatsoever. And fair use is a well accepted doctrine on Wikipedia for images which are not obtainable by other means.

I have restored one of the two images and added a fair use notice to it. From this point on, the matter should be discussed reasonably without any unilateral actions from either party. I have temporarily suspended your sysop status, but will reinstate it if you pledge not to re-delete this image unilaterally.—Eloquence 01:16, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)

Taw, I've restored your sysop status. --Brion 02:15, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

And I will remove it again if Taw starts deleting pages without discussion again.—Eloquence 02:24, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)

I have access to the database too. Taw 02:39, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Now you have edited a protected page. This is way over the line, Taw. Both your sysop and developer status are at risk.—Eloquence 02:40, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)

Assuring freeness of the Wikipedia is much more important than my sysop or any other powers here. Taw 02:52, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Taw, while I agree with you that the image in question shouldn't be used without clearer permission that we have right now, and I disagree strongly with Erik's unilateral desysoppings, there is a process here. I've listed the image on VfD and would prefer to let things go through at a reasonable pace. While the page is protected please let it be. --Brion 02:44, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Taw, if you care about Wikipedia's freeness, please concentrate your wrath on the 36,000 odd untagged images, and people who upload untagged images, rather than the tagged ones. Otherwise you're going to discourage people from being honest about the images they upload, and that is in none of our interests. Martin 02:23, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies please vote to keep it. Cautious 20:48, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)

It's a small world eh? I was just voting on Poland's betrayal by the western allies , and could have guessed you'd vote the same. :-) Kim Bruning 14:41, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Accomodation at 21C3

Hello Tomasz,

I'll give you accommodation in Berlin at the 21C3 (if you still need/want). You 'll need a sleeping bag. You are allowed to trink but not to smoke in my flat :-). Please tell me here if you accept :). --Koethnig 13:57, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

texvc

Hi Tomasz, not sure if this is the best place to reach you. Would you mind having a look at a proposed change I filed against texvc on bugzilla? While you're at it, there is another issue which I don't know how to fix. Thanks! --MarkSweep 00:39, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Voting

Please vote: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Anti-Semitism in Poland. --Ttyre 14:33, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Servant of God

Is a title. Its given to those being considered for being decalared a saint - --ClemMcGann 23:56, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let us follow wikipedia conventions. I'm not endorsing them. Just following them. If you want them changed - and you could have a point - it would be better to discuss them first. Rightly or wrongly we say His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI. Rightly or wrongly we say Servant of God of those considered for sainthood. --ClemMcGann 14:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Clem is correct re styles and titles. I guess it is not an area you have written about here. If you had you would be aware that styles and titles are used at the start of articles on wikipedia and long have been. It is covered in detail in the MoS and the naming conventions. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 21:01, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Radical human.png has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Radical human.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

I have no interest in keeping this image. If you are still interested in the image, please move to the Commons (I don't mess with the Commons much), find an article to link it to or vote to keep on the ifd page. --Nv8200p (talk) 19:53, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser list up

A peer review and discussion list for those with the checkuser power (five new ones on the en: arbcom). I am particularly interested in how you perform requests (apart from actually looking things up on Special:CheckUser). Please send me your email address and I'll send you an invitation to it - David Gerard 14:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that links to roseta wiki are broken (at least part of them). countryhacker 14:26, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are more images I made for wikipedia - complete list is on my page on Polish wikipedia in directory http://wiki.rozeta.com.pl/img/taw/

First one is giving 404 not found for me. countryhacker 20:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pantone page

Please see Talk:Pantone. Please do not continue this revert war, the point is important and should be dealt with by consensus. Notinasnaid 09:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I asked you NOT to revert without discussion. Please participate in the discussion. Because of the three revert war I cannot today restore the important information you deleted, but I do intend to; it is sourced. Notinasnaid 09:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't accuse

Please don't accuse me of being rude without knowing why i reverted moshe's edits and called it vandalism. It is also considered rude to call fellow editors rude without knowing anything about the matter. If you had read the talk page of tha article you would see that there were in fact no agreement by anyone, and that he keep vandalizing many pages every day until he reaches his, he even times his reverts so he will not get blocked for 3RR. He is a well known vandalizer from what i have heard in my few editing days. Please refrain from calling people rude in the future without a cause. Thank you for your cooperation --Darkred 00:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blokowanie

Czy mógłbyś mnie odblokować na polskiej Wikipedii? Zostałem zablokowany bez żadnego ostrzeżenia i podania przyczyny przez Wikipedystę:Szwedzki i od wczoraj nie mogę nic na polskijej Wiki zrobić (myślę, że zablokowano moje IP gdyż ktoś z podobnego adresu dokonywał wandalizmó, lecz to tylko moje domysły). pl:user:Aotearoa 04:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello Taw! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Air

Greetings, how is Air coming along? --Cat out 23:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kanji strokes frequency.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Kanji strokes frequency.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Sorry, I didn't see any note that the image was on Commons now. Thanks Nv8200p talk 03:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Straw Poll for List of Air episodes

There is a straw poll in hopes of quickly resolving the dispute over List of Air episodes. Talk:List of Air episodes#Straw poll for which episode table to use. Thought you might want to comment. --Cat out 19:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polish politician stubs

I am kindly requesting you operate your bot to sort them into Category:Polish politician stubs so stub sorters don't have to do it themselves. Roy A.A. 18:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Taw,

I noticed your posting to the Wikipedia mailing list here and I just wanted to thank you for presenting the viewpoint of many Wikipedians who do not wish to register their e-mail address. I believe as a group we make a valuable contribution to the Wiki, a contribution that will be lost if this proposal goes ahead. More of my feelings on the issue are expressed in my comment to Michael Snow that I posted here.

Thank you,

Cedars 02:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletes of DVD covers

For people who may be annoyed by my deletes of DVD covers:

I feel that decorating lists of episodes is not a good enough reason to have significant numbers of fair use DVD cover pictures. I think Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy point 8 and common sense agree with me here.

If you think that a particular picture was used also for actual important informational purposes somewhere else (for example to illustrate how a particular character looks like), feel free to undelete it, ask some admin to undelete it, or reupload it. Taw 19:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Block of User:Tha Bomba Mann lol and stuff like that

Ok... That user is blocked indefinitely because it's a blatant attack account and I believe that it's not from an ArbCom case. [4] [5] That template seems to be okay for usage in this case, since it says: "per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee." In this case, User:Antandrus blocked it due to it being a vandalism-only account. G.H e 01:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. By the way, I further modified the template so that if {{{1}}} is not given, it will automatically refer to the talk page. :) G.H e 01:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawbot

I've approved your request to expand Tawbot's scope; let me know if it still needs a bot-flag and I'll set it for you. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 07:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

Please be online :) --Cat out 10:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Efedryna.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Efedryna.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aldehyd.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Aldehyd.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jandek album covers

Good sir,

You have deleted the cover of nearly every Jandek album on Wikipedia, saying no cover significantly contributes to the article. Is it possible to discuss this? First of all, Jandek album covers are a significant part of the appeal of the albums, and are discussed on the Wikipedia page itself. Second, could you please just remove the image from the page, and keep the image on Wikipedia. There are no copyright issues with them, and it's a lot of work to get them back online again. Please respond to my inquiries, since I find your actions rather rude and would continue doing so if I don't receive a reply from you.

Thank you. --Leo44 (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahum. Excuse my rather angry tone. I wasn't aware of the ease with which images can be restored. And you're right about the Jandek article missing information on his unusual album covers. I still think most (if not all) of the covers should be here, but the articles will need proper description of all of them first.

I'm not sure what to think of your idea of getting rid of all the albums covers on wikipedia. It's true that most of them are just decorative, but they often make albums recognizable and are an important part of popular music. Anyway, thanks. I won't get mad at you again. ;) --Leo44 (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amarantine cover undeleted

I've undeleted the cover of Amarantine. It was used inappropriately in the Enya article, but it is accepted practice to illustrate articles about albums with fair use covers.--Eloquence * 15:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

Image:Fat.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fat.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 08:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melvin Jones

What's wrong with CSD G12 as a justification? Do you disagree that this is a copyvio? (no opinion on that from me...) - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:AN#Plagiarism_Detector_Bot.Geni 19:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images in lists

Hello, I see you have contributed your thoughts to Wikipedia talk:Fair use/Fair use images in lists. It's been dead for a while, but I have archived it and taken a new fresh start. I hope this time we will be able to achieve something as I have summarized the main points of both sides (feel free to improve them) and I call you to express your support or oppose on the concrete proposal that I have formulated. Thanks, Renata 02:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Texvc

I heard from TimStarling, that yuo where the one to talk to. I need your input to bugzilla:7774. _→AzaToth 11:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oberon article tangle

Please see my comment at talk:Oberon-1 (at least it was Oberon-1 when I left it moments ago). We really need to settle on something here, or WP will become far to dizzy making. We're sliding into the soup... ww 03:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a automated to all bot operators

Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated message to bot owners

As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:

Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.

Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 05:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tawbot deflagged

Your bot, Tawbot which was approved and flagged some time ago has now been deflagged due to inactivity. If you wish to run your bot again, feel free to return to the requests for bot approval page where you can reapply for your bot's task and flag. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the BAG or myself. WjBscribe 01:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Thinspiration

I have nominated Thinspiration, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinspiration. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wojciech Jaruzelski.

Do you know anything about Wojciech Jaruzelski?

Like, what was it like in Poland during his leadership?

He is Roman Catholic, so there should have been no

religious suppression at all, unless he was pressured

by the other Eastern Bloc countries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chamaoloan (talk • contribs) 08:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Texvc

I have nominated Texvc, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texvc. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping 04:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Ekumen

Category:Ekumen, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Tomasz,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Hex (❝?!❞) 11:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is perfectly fine :-) Taw (talk) 13:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi,

I ran into your user page because of https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/228457/ .

I loved The Proposal in the end of your user page! I'll do my best to adapt it. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 3Delight

The article 3Delight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches only found several passing mentions such as Books, News, browsers and especially Highbeam but nothing outstandingly better for this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hainish Cycle

Template:Hainish Cycle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

I've actually been editing all the time, just couldn't be bothered to log in.

Proposed deletion of Cell Cycle (journal)

The article Cell Cycle (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

hard to see notability here...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Taw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Taw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Polska Grupa Badawcza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Polska Grupa Badawcza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SITH (talk) 18:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Taw,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam Ołdakowski

The article Adam Ołdakowski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pixie (renderer)

The article Pixie (renderer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable or significant sources after seventeen years - I couldn't find any on Google either beyond WP:PASSING mentions. Doesn't seem notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HappyWith (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Kraków

Kraków has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]