User talk:Supaman89/Archive 2

Villagrán, Tamaulipas

Hi. Great job creating Mexican geographic article. You categorized Villagrán, Tamaulipas as both a town and a municipality. Are they exclusive of each other? --brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico talk

Hi Supaman

Are you sure it is a good idea to mention Corticopia? I don't think so.

Also you meant "leave", not "live".

Cheers, Wanderer57 (talk) 16:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the beach in London was too cold for you. When everyone is wearing parkas on the beach it kind of ruins the effect.

Cheers, Wanderer57 (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me again. The lady wrote in to help sort out the location thing for her 9 and 13 year old children. Do you really think it is helpful to them to get into the detail that you did?

Belize is in Central America, okay? I agree. But which continent is Belize in? Wanderer57 (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And me again. So we agree that anything from Alaska to Panama is located in the North American continent. (Actually everything from Panama to the northern end of Canada, which is quite a bit further.)

The problem is you wrote: "All languages separate NA (Mex,Can,USA) from Central America." This makes it sound like ONLY Mexico, the US, and Canada are in North America. This is very confusing. Wanderer57 (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We are going around in circles on this one. If it gets any worse I have to get into the tequila.

When you say: "All languages separate NA (Mex,Can,USA) from Central America." you know what you mean and I think I know what you mean but it is very confusing. You can't separate North America from Central America. CA is part of NA.

Would you mind if I edit this whole thing to make it simpler? Wanderer57 (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She will be back. Probably she is not as addicted to this nonsense as you or I. ;o) Wanderer57 (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

This & this, this & this, this & this... are they the same place? And if not, the distinction should be made clearer. Biruitorul (talk) 00:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template:Mexican cities

Well, it's nice to know that you don't hate me (I seem to get that a lot). Now to let you know what's up. Can you only run your PC at 800x600, or can you change it? Because I run at 1024x768, so I can't really tell if it would look good on other settings. But I am looking into this situation, so no need to worry about it. But because my setting is the most used, and that is the only one I can use, it may come out somewhat better for your setting. Secondly, I looked through this template's history and found no trace of this. I don't know if this was a floop on Wikipedia's part or if this came from another site. But since I can't find it and don't know what it even does, I am sticking with the idea of keeping the tnavbar on that spot.

It's glad to know that we are not enemies. I have been going through a lot of crap here on Wikipedia that I can't tell who likes my work or doesn't like my work. ¿Habláis español? Yo no. Hablo ruso. — Nuclear Vacuum 19:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I speak better Russian then Spanish. It's funny because I live in Florida too (funny). Anyway, I wanted to tell you that I have been looking into the issue, but I have been busy so it was hard for me. But after some calculations, I think having two images (instead of three) would help out more then the other way around. But now I am trying to find the proper size so it will fit. Maybe you can help me on that. ¡Adios! — Nuclear Vacuum 01:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Superpowers21.png

I understand what you were trying to do and I am happy you find an interest in potential superpowers. But you just can't upload to someone else's work and call it yours or his. Especially since it was my copyrighted work.

I reverted and undid your piece because you tampered with WP:C. If you wish to add an image of your own design, please download a new one, not just change one's work and call it yours. — Nuclear Vacuum 23:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say don't download it unless you wish to make a new article on "further possible superpowers." Simply because I noticed that you added Mexico to it, and Mexico isn't a potential superpower. But I do know it is somewhat a superpower (not to the extent of Russia or China), so I would actually promote having a separate section on the page talking about possible other superpowers like Japan, Australia, and Mexico. I can even help you out if you wish, because I did like your map (I just simply didn't want it if it meant removing mine. Would that be OK? — Nuclear Vacuum 00:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Sorry for the late reply, I haven't been online for a while now.

"New section"

Not to bother you, but I have some information that will make your messaging on talks easier. On the top of the page (next to the "edit this page" box) there is a box that says "new section." If you click it, it will automatically start a new section for you on the talk page. I only mention this because you are starting a new section by editing the last made discussion and making a new section manually. This is bad because we can't tell if you are messaging on that particular message, or making a new one. Just trying to help you out. Hope this will help you out. — Nuclear Vacuum 01:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the article's talk page. Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 17:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico is amongst the highest HDI's of LA? Where are Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Costa Rica, Cuba? Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 17:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United Kingdom cities

Hello there. It would mean a lot to me if you could help make an argument on the talk of the city template of the United Kingdom. I know that you are interested in the way these templates work and are interested in keeping them (to some extent) standard. Please make an argument on Template talk:United Kingdom cities#Consensus if you are intended on keeping some standards here. Please make a statement here and thank you very much. — Nuclear Vacuum 18:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very, very much. — Nuclear Vacuum 18:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:040901 008 aperturadesesion.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:040901 008 aperturadesesion.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC) --The Evil Spartan (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Commons

Hi. You have a new message here. Bye. Lin linao (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks. My response [answer?] in Commons. Bye. Lin linao (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of Mexico

Go to WP:AN. That page is on the administrators' watch list, so they'll respond immediatly. --the Dúnadan 18:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo in Mexico Ethnography

Hello, thanks for letting me know, I totally understand.. no room. And si, hablo un poco de espanol..pero hablo mas el Ingles.. Soy de California... =] BTW, "changing the wrong idea that some people have about Mexico, which most of the times doesn't even come close to how Mexico is really like."... that is also my quest! Have a nice day.Cali567 (talk) 22:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tijuana move

Hi, This should have gone to WP:RM for discussion before being moved. I has been moved back to Tijuana several times in the last few months. Kevin (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help?!?!

Hey I like the way you have your profile. Especially the part where you put some of the words a diffrent colour ("Un poco sobre mi..." and "Some articles I've contributed to:") and I was wondering if you can help me. If you want and have the time to, I dont want to force you nor take your time. Thanks for reading, Rdrgz93 (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool but how do u get to the source codes? and thankx man, really apreciate it Rdrgz93 (talk) 17:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thankx, but how do you change the colour? Rdrgz93 (talk) 22:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea thanks, but i would like a diff. colour, like bluish but idk how 2 change it, i tryed but i only got a diff. shade of green or i got black Rdrgz93 (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea thanks man for all your help really apreciate it.Rdrgz93 (talk) 04:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico

Qué onda wey. Oye, vi tu rewording en la sección de geografía y tienes algunos conceptos equivocados que la verdad dejaban más mal parado a México. Primero las "plates" son las placas tectónicas y la North American Plate cubre casi el 99% de México. Centro América descansa en la Placa del Caribe. México no tiene nada de su territorio en esa placa.

Por otro lado, el 12% que algunos geógrafos incluyen en Centro América es geofísicamente o fisiográficamente, es decir, por las características físicas del suelo. Y no todos, por eso es importante decirlo.

Y por último, geopolíticamente North America es MX, US y CAN. No confundas el uso cultural que algunos le dan en inglés con el concepto geopolítico de North America, pues éste es siempre los tres países. En inglés, en chino o en francés, geopolíticamente NA son los tres países.

Saludos :D Alex Covarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 01:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agriculture in Mexico

Do you know what is the main agricultural product in Mexico? The article Economy of Mexico does not have much information. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 02:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just recently read the article and found it interesting. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mexico map

Hello there, I've been off-line for a while and have only just seen the map with the mark around it in the discussion page on Mexico. I think this looks just grand.

If you want to go ahead and post it, I say "Why not?"

I thank you for doing that and ask your pardon for not responding sooner but personal stuff got in the way.

Porthugh (talk) 06:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NAFTA!

Let me know what you think about this. Alex Covarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 20:12, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user supports NAFTA.

Map of the States of Mexico

This is a very clear, handsome piece of work. Two complaints: some of the smaller states are overlaid with abbreviations which are not those listed in the table immediately below the picture in the article "Mexico". Since those are official Mexican post office abbreviations, it might be best to use them. And secondly, the black dot that represents Mexico City seems to have migrated to an off-shore drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico; after a while, I figure out that the real City is on the other black dot. Why not just label the real dot as DF? Thanks for the map, and hope you can fix it. Norm mit (talk) 21:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yucatan cenotes

All right i actualy do have a photo of a cenote from last year and would be happy to post it. Also was thinking about adding a picture of some wind turbines in chiapas I do agree that the Pemex refinery was a bit dirty, I had planned to just use it as a temporary photo until i could upload some better photos and one last thing i think that the sierra madre picture might actualy look a bit nicer than the Cihuahua snowfall photo as it actualy shows the montains and apline setting of central Mexico which might better represent the diversity of mexico's many climates thanks for the tips and any input would be great:)-Veertlte —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veertlte (talk • contribs) 19:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to fr:projet:Mexique

Hello. I am Youssef, a contributor to Wikipedia in French. I see that you are interested in Mexico and that you contributed on Wikipedia in French. I would be pleased if you join fr:Projet:Mexique. It is not a problem if you do not speak well French. You can leave messages in Spanish or English in fr:Discussion Projet:Mexique. Someone will translate them.--Youssef (talk) 20:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening. I am not a Mexican. I am a Belgian (living in Brussels) from Morrocan origin. I studied Spanish and became interrested in Spanish speaking countries. My knowledge of Latin America is very shalow but I would like to learn more.--Youssef (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HOLA SUPAMAN89!!!

Hola, me llamo Carlos Rosan, tengo 17 años soy de la ciudad de Laredo, en el norte del Pais. Estuve leyendo la discucion acerca de la Pronunciacion de la letra X en el articulo de Mexico, y me di cuenta que dijiste que el sonido de esa letra o en las palabras JAMON, RELOJ etc... se pronuncian como si fuese uno a tirar un escupitajo y que solo se dice asi en España. Aqui en el norte del pais es muy comun pronunciar asi la letra J, o la X en Mexico como escupitajo, y no me habia dado cuenta que habia otras maneras de pronunciarla como la H de HAMSTER en ingles, como lo hacen en otras partes del pais como Tabasco, una vez que visite ese estado me di cuenta que tenian un dialecto del Español muy diferente al que se habla en esta parte del pais, a que se debe eso? y por que el dialecto del norte es muy diferente a todos los demas? y realmente existe un Español Mexicano "Estandar", por que la verdad en Mexico por lo que me he dado cuenta, existen por lo menos 7 diferentes dialectos del Español que son Norte, Centro, Occidente, Sur (Oaxaca, Guerrero), Peninsula de Yucatan, Chiapas, y el Litoral del Golfo de Mexico (Veracruz, Tabasco). Si tienes tiempo, por favor explicame por que existen varios dialectos del Español en Mexico y no uno estandar. GRACIAS—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.38.54.115 (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French article

Hello. Here is a short reply. I have not yet carefully looked at the last edits on fr:Mexique. On French Wikipedia there are a lot of people who do not like people speaking English. Most of them prefer that people speak Spanish. See for example here fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro/Militantisme anti-anglais sur Wikipédia or more recently fr:Wikipédia:Le_Bistro/31_août_2008#Possible_vanity_article_and_autobiography So, that may strange people on fr: prefer Spanish to English. I personaly do not care. But I wanted to warn you on future unfreindly messages from other contributors.

I generally browse with image disabelled, so I may not notice imidiatelly the improvment on new images. You can contact me for any problem/suggestion/request for help/etc in English or Spanish. Hasta luego.--Youssef (talk) 12:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English article

Hello. I have seen that the number of inhabitants on the English article was 109 million. It is based on CIA factbook which in my humble opinion is not reliable. I have compared CIA factbook population number for other countries, e.g. Brasil and there are discrepancies with national official statistic bureaus. INEGI gives http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/contenidos/espanol/proyectos/integracion/inegi324.asp?s=est&c=11722#tres 106.7 million inhabitants. Could you fix it by adding INEGI data? I think it is important to fix because a lot of Wikipedias in other languages base their content on the English one. Buenas fin de semana --Youssef (talk) 12:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]