User talk:SunnyMeadows90

Hello There

A personal friend of mine has been talking about your behavior, especially everywhere on social media. I heard they said you have such toxic behavior on other sites and you are using your fan-fiction as something believable. Keep in mind, information like this needs reliable sources you know. People are not gonna believe you unless you have reliable sources to back up. Please understand, not trying to attack, just saying that reliable sources are required for information such as yours. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well look when Disney gives names to Doug's EX and Delilah's EX then I'll change it, also I was harassed by a toxic fan and I'm normally nice but when I'm hurt I snap like anyone else, however I respect your comment, also I do have sources like Dolly and Dylan not being related, 1958 + 60 = 2017, Dolly saying that Diesel is half of Dylan's age. And more. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 02:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I ment to say 1958 + 59 = 2017, my mistake. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 03:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is the timeline official?

Hello, I am inquiring wether the timeline you posted is official, I felt inclined to post a disclaimer regarding it as it is not acknowledged by the 101 Dalmatian Street Wiki, and simply posted here on wikipedia. I regret to inform you that I edited in the disclaimer to avoid confusion with the officially accepted timeline on the wiki. Polyarc12 (talk) 11:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's based on the information I was able to gather over the years and like I said some names are place holders but Dylan's Dad being Named Albert is obviously space feemed. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 17:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand of what is real and what is not? Your timeline is fanon and that is final! Please don't add your information to actual articles I beg of you! BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The timeline is Cannon based in the information I was able to find. AND DON'T YOU EVEN THINK OF SCREWING IT UP I'M WARNING YOU! Yes I'm angry now so please. Leave this ALONE! SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

in regards to recent new information given to me, this user and their associate have reportedly threatened people with their lives over blocking them on X (Formerly twitter), I have received screenshots from concerned people regarding this user and their friend. they are free to make their own timeline, that is no issue, however what is an issue, is that they are presenting it as "going to be replacing the timeline currently on the fandom wiki" as well. Polyarc12 (talk) 22:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I was trying to warn them of Winter's anger but that's in the past, also there is no in universe timeline except mine. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 23:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. it Isn't. Also he's one of the guys that RUN the 101 DS wiki Polyarc12 (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve looked for another timeline, but there is no other except mine and it is accurate to within a day. After all do a fee is not seen in episode. One according to the research that I’ve done so her being born a month later is pretty much correct give or take a day. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you not understand what we're saying? there is NO ISSUE with you making a fan timeline, posting it where ever, the issue is that you are PRESENTING it as THE FANDOM WIKI timeline, when one already exists, and claim one simply does not exist, when all it takes is looking on the wiki, and its smack dab on the front page. Polyarc12 (talk) 13:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Pups are dognaped on November 2nd 1958, that allows me to work backroads.

The pups were born 1 month before and Cruella visited 1 mouth before that and Pongo got married 6 Human Months before that.

And here's my issue with Hunter being locked away for 6 Months.

Dorothy is 2.1 Dog Years when Hunter tries to take her family away but if Hunter comes back 6 Months later that Means Dorothy should be 5.6 aka 3.5 Dog Years older.

So that's why I'm saying he was locked away for 6 dog months aka 24 days.

Also there's no Timeline other than a vag 59 year gap and that's it.

Think back to Star Wars, I'm able to understand the Timeline very well because theres a detailed timeline.

I think that's the problem with you, you don't like detail well no mater the cost, a detailed timeline is still the same timeline. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the page 101 times and theres NOTHING! Other then links to the charters such as Dolly, Dylan and more. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not ONCE did I say anything about your timeline specificially. you can post it whereever you want, zero proble, with that. none. I do not care. what I DO have a problem with, is you apparently claiming, in various screenshots given to me that it will replace the one on the Wiki on the front page. that you claim that does not exist. it's on the front page. https://101dalmatianstreet.fandom.com/wiki/101_Dalmatian_Street_Wiki Polyarc12 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to as he was talking about the timeline IRL but the one I'm working on happened in the Disney Universe not ours so his video can stay. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The release dates are IRL but the dates I'm presenting is in the Disney Universe just like the 1961 film taking place in 1958. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

looking at several screenshots and texts I have recieved, this is a lie. as in the messages sent, you claim to be talking to an admin known as Dan, and claim to be replacing phron's timeline. Polyarc12 (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have backups, add not supposed to replace it’s supposed to expand upon. That 59 year gap that we already know of between 101 Dalmatians and 101 Dalmatian Street. SunnyMeadows90 (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The contents of your sandbox are obviously not suitable for Wikipedia. Can you give me any reason why that should not be deleted under WP:NOTWEBHOST? And do you intend to do any editing that furthers Wikipedia's goals? If not you risk being blocked as WP:NOTHERE. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reported.

Accumulating the evidence that I have on hand, as well as the reports from others. I am hereby reporting your account. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Polyarc12 (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Polyarc12 (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:SunnyMeadows90/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:SunnyMeadows90/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – bradv 15:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv 20:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]