Jump to content

User talk:Significa liberdade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Significa liberdade! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:55, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Admin debrief

[edit]

Hello, Significa liberdade. Congratulations on your successful RfA. At The Signpost, we'd like to make admin WP:DEBRIEFs a regular feature. If you're considering writing one, we'd be happy to publish it. There's no deadline, so if you decide to put one together, we'd be happy to include it in whatever the upcoming issue is. Here are the last two we published for reference: HouseBlaster and asilvering. Svampesky (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Process of Elimination.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Process of Elimination.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Quantico (novel)
added a link pointing to Mariposa
Red Thunder (novel)
added a link pointing to Worlds Without End

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Persecution of Greeks in Communist Albania

[edit]

Draft:Persecution of Greeks in Communist Albania It's been a year, and the draft still hasn't been improved - and I don't think it can be improved because there's a structural problem. The Greeks who were expelled were not expelled because of their nationality, but because of their beliefs. Is it not time to delete it? LefterDalaka (talk) 18:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, LefterDalaka! Drafts that have not been edited by a human editor within the past six months will be deleted via G13. If you think this drat (or any other), qualifies for speedy deletion, you may nominate it yourself using the appropriate criteria. Otherwise, it's generally best practice to let stale, non-notable drafts reach their 6-month expiration. I hope this helps! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Audie Award for Fiction Narrator

[edit]

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Audie Award for Fiction Narrator".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tale of the Troika

[edit]

Your edit was:

19:11, October 15, 2024 Significa liberdade talk contribs 2,032 bytes +44‎ Added

tag

In fact, in such situations the tag nofootnotes is better be used. --Altenmann >talk 02:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MAPs aren't a hoax

[edit]

This isn't true that it's a hoax that simply isn't true. Here's an example that it's currently being used (https://forum.map-union.org/). SCM123ABC (talk) 01:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any reliable, independent sources regarding this topic? Thus far, other editors have not been able to do so, which is why Minor-Attracted Person directs to a Wiktionary definition. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah you probably right. Well the movement is in it's early stretches maybe in a couple years they'll be more. SCM123ABC (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
I notice you might be getting a lot of notifications that I'm reverting you. If you look again, you'll realize this is unintended on my part. Here's an apologetic cookie. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Deleted Wellness Extract Company Page

[edit]

Hi there,

I hope you are doing good.

This is regarding a company page (Wellness Extract) that was deleted by you on 23:16, 11 October 2024. I have made some changes to the page and i have tried my best to adhare with wikipedia guidelines. I am providing you the updated version. Kindly give your feedback and suggestions so, that I can publish this page.

Wellness Extract is a Canadian healthcare company established in 2019 and registered in UV International Traders Inc Unit-1A, 30508 Great Northern Avenue, Abbotsford, BC V2T6H4, Canada. The company provides natural, science-backed solutions to support different areas of health. The company aims to combine science and natural therapies that is reflected in the name "Wellness Extract" (pronounced well-ness ex-trakt), also known as "WE." Wellness Extract is inspired by the personal experiences of founder Virender Dass, who sought alternative therapies to support his mother’s cancer treatment. A combination of personal inspiration and spiritual philosophy, the name also reflects Virender's goal to incorporate the three tenets of Lord Shree Rama—balance, harmony, and holistic well-being—into contemporary healthcare.

Their supplements are based on scientific studies. The company’s portfolio covers several health categories including brain health, heart health, gut health, body detox, muscle health, skin health, bone health, and immune support, all focusing on holistic wellness.

The company has expanded to include an office in Haryana, Ambala, India, aligning with its mission to provide healthcare solutions globally. “WE” ensures that healthcare is not just a luxury but an achievable goal for everyone, no matter where they are in the world.

History and Founder: Virender Dass, the founder and director of Wellness Extract, began his journey in natural health in 2015. After his mother’s cancer diagnosis, he explored alternative treatments and worked with Dr. Barrie Tan, a scientist known for research on tocotrienols. Tocotrienols became part of her treatment regimen. Following this experience; Virender Das, a successful VFX artist made a bold decision to shift careers and dedicate himself to natural health solutions. Virender shifted careers from VFX to natural health solutions. Thus, Wellness Extract (“WE”) was born as a company that offers supplements based on scientific research.

Under Virender’s leadership and Dr. Tan's collaboration, Wellness Extract has developed a range of natural supplements, focusing on improving well-being through science-backed products.

Ingredients:

  • Annatto Plant: Annatto, a natural condiment derived from the seeds of the Achiote plant (Bixa Orellana), is widely used as a natural food coloring agent in a variety of products, from dairy and baked goods to breakfast cereals. It is rich in carotenoid pigments, including Bixin and Norbixin. This plant, native to the Amazonian Forests of Mexico and South America. It is more than just a natural dye, a rich source of tocotrienols, a potent antioxidant form of Vitamin E. These tocotrienols contain two powerful isomers, Delta (90%) and Gamma (10%), making it an ideal source of Vitamin E. Annatto may support cardiovascular health, skin health, as well as help reduce  inflammation.
  • Tocotrienols: Tocotrienols are compounds structurally and functionally related to the vitamin E family, found in vegetable oils (palm oil and rice bran oil), nuts, and grains. It consists of four molecules: alpha (α), beta (β), delta (δ), and gamma (γ), each with a unique chemical structure and biological activity. They are researched for their potential benefits, including antioxidant properties and support for cardiovascular, skin (pigmentation, wrinkles, and moisture loss), and neurodegenerative health.
  • Bovine Colostrum: Colostrum is the pre-milk fluid produced by the mother’s mammary glands during the first few hours of giving birth before she begins actual lactation. It is “Life’s First Food” that contains natural antibodies and is crucial for the health and vitality of the newborn. It contains antibodies in the form of proteins, that is known for its immune-boosting properties and is used to support gut health and overall well-being. It is also beneficial for healthy skin and hair due to its ability to produce collagen which is important for skin and hair health.
  • Geranylgeraniol (GG): Geranylgeraniol is a naturally occurring isoprenoid involved in several cellular processes including protein prenylation, cell signaling, growth, and maintenance. However, GG synthesis decreases with age and is influenced by other variables including chronic sickness, poor diet, etc. This deterioration might be a factor in several age-related health problems, such as worse cellular performance and a higher chance of chronic illnesses. GG is also present in many dietary sources, but the amount of GG in food might be insufficient for certain individuals that is why GG supplements can be beneficial for health benefits. GG supplements are being studied for their potential to support muscle strength, natural coenzyme Q10, and general health, especially as natural GG levels decline with age.
  • Humic & Fulvic Acid: Humic and fulvic acids  aren't just single compounds but a powerful spectrum of organic acids naturally found in soils, oceans, and streams. These acids play an essential role in nature's life cycle. Humic acid is known for its ability to enhance nutrient absorption and may support immune health. They are also used in some supplements.
  • Zeolite: Zeolite is a mineral formed through the natural chemical reaction between volcanic lava and seawater. It is known for its ability to remove heavy metals and toxins from the body. It also acts as a catalyst that supports better absorption of nutrients and detoxification.
  • H2: Hydrogen is the universe's lightest and most plentiful chemical element, denoted by the symbol H and atomic number one. It has antioxidant properties that neutralize damaging free radicals in the body. It may help in reducing oxidative stress and inflammation.
  • Astaxanthin: Astaxanthin is a carotenoid derived from microalgae, known for its antioxidant properties. It has potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. It is studied for its role in maintaining skin and eye health and supporting cardiovascular function.
  • CoQ10: Coenzyme Q10,  commonly referred to as Coenzyme Q10, is an antioxidant that occurs naturally in the body and is mostly found in the mitochondria of cells. It is used by the body for many different functions. Some meals contain trace amounts of it, but the body is also capable of synthesizing it. But when people age their levels of CoQ10 may decline; for this reason, CoQ10 supplements are frequently taken. It supports cardiovascular health, controls blood sugar levels, improves brain function, and may protect cells from oxidative damage.

Divya9608 (talk) 06:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Divya9608! Can you share reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage of the company? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hii @Significa liberdade
As desired by you please find some sources below:
1. https://apnews.com/press-release/ez-newswire/wellness-265d6d9c9bd6146f47f95ff336512b70
2. https://www.benzinga.com/content/40144373/wellness-extract-unveils-the-secret-to-hydration-h2-molecular-hydrogen
3. https://markets.financialcontent.com/buffnews/article/eznewswire-2024-8-2-wellness-extract-unveils-the-secret-to-hydration-h2-molecular-hydrogen
4. https://markets.financialcontent.com/bostonherald/article/eznewswire-2024-8-2-wellness-extract-unveils-the-secret-to-hydration-h2-molecular-hydrogen
5. https://pr.washingtoncitypaper.com/article/Wellness-Extract-Unveils-the-Secret-to-Hydration-H2-Molecular-Hydrogen?storyId=66ad6df9e051a30008d9d113
Awaiting your positive response..
Regards,
Divya Divya9608 (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @Divya9608: As a note, you can start creating Draft:Wellness Extract whenever you want. You do not need permission. However, I will note that all five of those sources are actually the same source reprinted across multiple platforms. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Significa liberdade
I have published the page "Wellness Extract" as per suggested..
Regards, Divya9608 (talk) 06:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, as per our last communication, you advised that this page can be published now, but after resubmitting the content, another moderater @DoubleGrazing" has put similar restrictions which is not allowing this page to published. I would request you to kindly approve the page. Divya9608 (talk) 07:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Divya9608: since you pinged me, I will take the liberty of replying.
Firstly, just to clarify, I'm not an administrator (if that is what you mean by 'moderater' [sic]), merely an AfC reviewer.
With respect, Significa liberdade did not say this "can be published now", but rather that "you can start creating Draft:Wellness Extract", which you did. When I reviewed that draft, I declined it as promotional, and requested that it be speedily deleted, which it was. Wikipedia articles must be written in a neutral, factual manner, and be primarily based on what independent and reliable secondary have previously published about a subject; this was not the case here.
While I have your proverbial ear, may I ask what is your relationship with this subject? This has been queried on your talk page, twice, but I don't believe you've responded to those queries. Could you do that now, please? Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kawa model

[edit]

The article Kawa model you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kawa model for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:James W. Ziskin

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Significa liberdade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James W. Ziskin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft - Viveen Page

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Viveen I cant find your name listed on the Talk Page as mentioned above - another editor mentioned you had deleted most of my page and left the 5 or 10% of my work available. Here is my rant directed at who I thought had done that. Apparantly some of this should be for your attention as previously the other editor kept interjecting.

I was in the middle of editing the page - I spent three hours yesterday and 2 hours the day before. I had NOT pressed the resubmit button. You have just deleted my work before it is finished. This is madness!!!! What a ridiculous system. Viveen as an artist has be marginalised by a male dominated industry and her work not given the credit it deserves - particularly with N-Trance where the record company and the band leader tried to erase her from history (as she left at the height of their fame and had to bring in people to mime on the videos - I can send you the contracts if you want). You seem to be assisting in the process of suppressing her right to be acknowledged. The Viveen page I am setting up is a page of FACTS not superlatives and all it needs is some time because we all haven't written 200 articles on Wikipedia and so its a learning process. Kindly simmer down, back off and try and have a bit of respect for what i am trying to do here. You even deleted around 12 of the references. Why? Why is the site Discogs so bad? Is it because it is a competitor? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discogs You even list it on your own site - so it cant be that bad. It is a major industry source of information. That's a FACT - its not opinion. So I'm assuming you have no knowledge of the music industry. One of those Discogs pages I referenced has 88 references to Viveens work - songs that she wrote or sung on. The missing tracks are the N-Trance ones because her work has been obscured as detailed above. So again - kindly put the page back to what it was like on my last edit and let me get on with it. I will then come back to you when I am ready to find out if all is good to go. Thank you.

Also you have clasiffied the Musicbrainz site as an unreliable source. You obviously don't know that the BBC and other media organisations use Musicbrainz for their source of images and information. These are some of the biggest organisations in the world. If it is good enough for them - why is it not good enough for yourself? Ref https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/brainz/ Rtm-2000 (talk) 07:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: did a good job explaining the issues to you. Your rant here at Significa liberdade's Talk page suggests you only had cursory look at their explanations. You should take some time to familiarise yourself with the Wikipedia policies and guidelines DoubleGrazing referred to before repeating yourself. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Rtm-2000! As Robby.is.on stated, DoubleGrazing has explained these issues to you on your talk page. In short:
  • Wikipedia considers Discogs and Musicbrainz to be generally unreliable because they are user generated.
  • The material removed from Draft:Viveen has been deleted and cannot be retrieved because it is copyrighted, which is a legal issue.
  • Given that you have a conflict of interest, it is highly recommended that you do not continue editing her page.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft : House Of Hasib

[edit]

Hi I have fixed the problems that you have highlighted in the draft can you please verify and let me know if something else should be improved Fuzayl1 (talk) 13:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fuzayl1! Thank you for cleaning up the draft to remove copyrighted material. Someone from the Articles for Creation group will review the draft. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:CodeJames

[edit]

PLEASE delete newpage vandalism full of insults created by global LTA by Special:Contributions/103.6.198.192 no other substantial edits at all.

Hi, CopperViopper! Thank you for reaching out with this concern. Can you tell me how you came across CodeJames's talk page? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was trying to help them out on User:Justlettersandnumbers talk page. Whoops. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 16:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help, I dream of horses! It looks like you were doing a good job talking them through it. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) x2. Hi, Significa liberdade! I've blocked CopperViopper as a sock of User:Jtalja, though I don't know which LTA that sock belongs to. I took the liberty of reverting two edits to this page, do please revert if you'd like to. I dream of horses, thank you for your polite intervention! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers! I was looking through their edit history, too, given that this seemed like quite a suspicious request for a new user. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed! I see that CodeJame$ is also globally locked, but no idea if it's as the same LTA or not. If this is anything to by, this may trace back to here. But I'm so bad at this stuff, and probably guessing wrong (I do rather wish the stewards would actually name the LTA when locking an account). Anyway, on to the next! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Justlettersandnumbers and Significaliberdade: Since the one thing we can all agree on is that this is odd behavior, and since this person ight be a sockpuppet of someone, it might actually be worth opening up a sockpuppet investigation. The CopperViopper account might have information as to new IPs, sleeper/good hand account, etc. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jtalja, comment at will! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constant revert on Igbo-Ukwu

[edit]

Hello Significa liberdade there is a user with this IP 2600:1700:CED:5000:DBAF:7C75:237E:1745, this user keeps vandalising and spamming the Igbo-Ukwu page unfortunatly for me i don't know how to report things like this so i came to you i hope you can help me. Bernadine okoro (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, Bernadine okoro! I have now protected the page so IP users cannot edit it. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright thank you so much Bernadine okoro (talk) 04:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Significa Liberdade its me again, I’ve noticed some potential foul play on the Igbo-Ukwu page. The same edits you previously removed, which were originally added by that IP user, have been reinstated without any sources this time by a different user with a Wikipedia account. Would it be possible to lock the page again? Bernadine okoro (talk) 23:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bernadine okoro For future reference, the place to request page protection would be at WP:RFPP. It's okay to ask an admin you trust, but RfPP might be quicker. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow thanks for letting me know Bernadine okoro (talk) 04:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:06:50, 22 October 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by SqrtLog

[edit]


I have written

to match

I would like to make List of House of Lords cases a directory of links to these pages.

I have matched the existing structure of the 3 existing pages, but the drafts were rejected for not having secondary sources.

But this hasn't happened for the three existing pages. This also does not seem to apply to List of acts of the Scottish Parliament from 2024, List of acts of Senedd Cymru from 2024, List of acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 2024, List of acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 2024, 2024 judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom so I am confused why it is being applied to these pages. I was under the impression that law-related lists did not have the same requirements and apex court cases are inherently notable.

SqrtLog (talk) 17:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SqrtLog: Thank you for reaching out with your concern! At present, a lot of poorly written articles exist on Wikipedia that would not pass the Articles for Creation (AfC) process if these were created today. Our goal at AfC is to make sure Wikipedia is a valuable, reliable source of information and that new articles meet certain standards before publication. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:নাস্তিক আকাশ

[edit]

Unfortunately, they have been at it for a bit, and some level of block (whether fully, or a partial block on editing mainspace) may be necessary. They don't even have enough fluency in English to know we're asking them to speak in English. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carole DeSanti

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Significa liberdade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carole DeSanti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might sign this contribution yourself

[edit]

As opposed to an unsigned template. BusterD (talk) 14:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! No idea why I didn't sign that. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extra eyes are always helpful. Welcome aboard, by the way. BusterD (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Out of the blue, I'd like to help you with deletion processes, if you're willing to accept an extra set of eyes and occasional friendly critique. I wouldn't say anything if I didn't care. BusterD (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, for sure! I'd really appreciate that. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, BusterD! I wanted to touch base on this again. Did you have specific feedback at the moment, or were you just asking if I'd be up to receiving feedback in the future? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm so sorry. You're doing fine work. I didn't mean to imply otherwise. Recently I'm up to my neck in real life. The wiki-time I have spent recently has been quite specific. Would you mind if I sent you an email to start us off? BusterD (talk) 18:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia.

Would you Please help neutrality RFC to be reopened?

Summary: Can an RfC for improving neutrality in a major US presidential election article be reopened after it was hastily closed by a specific user?

1. There were many opinions that the biased article in the US presidential election article should be improved.

2. An RFC for improving neutrality was started, and when opinions for improving neutrality came in, it was hastily closed less than two days after the RFC was created.

3. I would appreciate it if you could help improve Wikipedia articles by reopening the relevant RfC so that the opinions of users who want to address neutrality can be posted.

Link : [[1]] Goodtiming8871 (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Goodtiming8871! I see you reached out to BD2412, JoJan, Bkonrad, Crisco 1492, and me with this request. Looking at the RFC, I also see that you are the one who started the RFC. Glancing through the discussion on the Talk page, I also see that many editors have replied to you requesting sources, given that NPOV is not the same thing as BALANCE. That said, I'm wondering if you tried posting to the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard and/or contacting one of the relevant WikiProjects, both of which are mentioned as prerequisites for starting an RFC (per WP:RFCBEFORE). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice about the dispute resolution Notice board. I created the page on the dispute resolution Notice board[[[[2]] ]] and the Project page - Please advise me if it's incorrect location or there any thing that I should improve. :) [[3]] Goodtiming8871 (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In these cases, dispute resolution should be about the original dispute--why you wanted the original RFC to begin with--given that these are steps you should take before starting an RFC. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reason for initiating the RFC was that several users on the Talk Page continued to raise issues with the neutrality of the Lead part of the document, but other users demanded that it be left as a list of only one candidate's criticisms, so this was attempted to be resolved through the RfC.Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Goodtiming8871: Did you bring up the issue at the appropriate WikiProject and at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not realize previously that I should have attempted to resolve it through the appropriate WikiProject and Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. However, I registered in both places today because you kindly informed me. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Goodtiming8871: Because you did not previously bring your issue to the appropriate places, it would be best to bring the original issue there rather than asking to re-open the RFC, considering you still haven't what is required to start an RFC. As such, it is very unlikely that your request to re-open the RFC will be granted. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see, so that I will edit my request.
As project page was my very first attempt to ask inquiry, can you please advise me whether I posted at the appropriate location? Goodtiming8871 (talk) 02:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that location makes sense. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for your kind response. I checked the status but both locations has not yet been updated. I assume that it takes time. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 03:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if a controversial topic was edited in a biased manner, if we try to correct this, how can we ensure fairness on Wikipedia when several editors close the discussion to prevent further discussion, defending the bias by criticizing only one of the two current presidential candidates and saying that the other candidate should not be included even if there are many credible articles criticizing the other candidate?
[[4]]
However, considering that one of the volunteers who participated in the dispute resolution noticeboard recommended additional conversations with other editors, should we assume that Wikipedia edits content according to the opinions of users who are interested in the topic? So if the content seems biased, should we go back to the discussion and post it on the dispute resolution noticeboard again based on the discussion content? Goodtiming8871 (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iona Singh

[edit]

Hello, thanks for your comments. However I cannot find the Edit button at the top of the Window on the DRAFT page as is directed, so am unable to place the in-text references as you suggest, at the moment. Thanks. Ernestina1844 (talk) 07:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ernestina1844! The edit link should be in the same place as it was before. Have you tried refreshing the page? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I've managed to edit it now. Could you tell me the procedure for placing in-text links. I seem to have made one in the text but the word REDIRECT has been inserted next to it. Ernestina1844 (talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Ernestina1844! I would recommend reviewing Wikipedia's referencing guide for beginners. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suburban Park and Big Nine

[edit]

Hello:

I'm new to this whole article writing thing, and I have a few questions for you on how I can improve my submissions:

1) All of my research into conference membership has come from newspaper clippings (which even show conference standings in some instances) and high school yearbooks (which have sports schedules and make specific references to conference membership).

2) Basically, my entire focus has been on conference membership comings and goings over the years. Would additional information (i.e. sports offered, conference championships, etc.) help?

3) If what I have so far isn't article-worthy, does it at least qualify for publishing as a stub at this point? If not, what more does it need?

Thanks for your input! Moserjames79 (talk) 15:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Moserjames79! The important thing to show that a topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines is to provide reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage of the topic. High school yearbooks generally don't count toward notability because they are too closely connected with the subject; however, they can be valuable sources of information. Newspaper clippings will be a better bet, though these don't always contribute to notability either. Overall, the point is to prove not only that a thing exists (verifiable) but its that its worthy of having its own Wikipedia page (notable). I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any further questions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response, I think that clears up my first two questions, but what about publishing as a stub? Does what I currently have qualify, or would I need more information? Moserjames79 (talk) 20:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moserjames79: Concerns about notability do not change regardless of the article's length. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just revised the two articles that you initially rejected, looking for sources that outline the history of the conferences, adding some additional information to the Membership History table, and a list of State Champions to come out of the conference. Feel free to take another look, and if there are still issues, please provide input. Thanks! Moserjames79 (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About my draft.

[edit]

Hello @Significa liberdade, hope you are well.

I certainley understand why you rejected my draft, however I have tried to take onboard your advice to improve it but I simply can't. You see, I created the articles about the 3 annual television specials and needed a list to list all 3 specials like other articles about the same company. I tried my best to gather other sources but it is simply not covered in that way. All that is availible to myself are reviews or the listings of what took place. I tried my best to look for reliable sources and did add one which could work but again, couldn't find much as the articles, the seperate ones at least, speak for themseleves. I am going to resubmit the draft and I hope with this context it goes well.

Thank you. Lemonademan22 (talk) 00:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of DQw4w9WgXcQ

[edit]

I noticed that you deleted DQw4w9WgXcQ, which redirected to Rickrolling, on the grounds of Wikipedia:CSD#G4, that it had been deleted before as a result of a deletion discussion in 2019. The redirect was recreated in the course of another redirect discussion on October 25, 2024 because of its recognizability and being identified as associated with the topic ofthe target article in an academic paper. Is that grounds for un-deleting the redirect? At what point does an editor consensus in 2024 overturn one from 2019? Thanks for bearing with me, and if I'm asking in the wrong place, let me know—I've never asked before about an undeletion of this kind. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 08:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again; just following up on this question. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 07:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Hydrangeans! Thanks for bringing this to my attention! Although this is uncommon practice, I am going to undelete the redirect and start a new discussion given the existing evidence. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I very much appreciate you doing so. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 22:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hydrangeans:, to answer the question, the way that a WP:G4 deletion is overturned is if the reasons for deletion no longer apply. When this was created on October 25th 2024, the status quo from the 2019 discussion was the exact same. There was wishful thinking about possibly recreating this from the recent 9jeJbdVl2jI RfD, but in terms of context at the target article, nothing had substantially changed about the structure of Rickrolling between 2019 and 2024, and consensus from 2019 indicated that the ID had "no usage history here on Wikipedia", per Rosguill and others. It would be impossible to reinstate the redirect as long as the deletion rationale from 2019 held still, which was the case at the time this redirect was G4'd on October 25th.
Material related to the ID was added to Rickrolling on October 27th, which substantially changed the context & nullified many of the reasons for deletion in 2019, and would be able to be recreated after that point. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also Significa liberdade, because the deletions (and multiple G4s) were originally made by way of community discussion (at RfD), per the undeletion policy, pages deleted by means of a community discussion should not be undeleted except by deletion review (DRV#3). G4 is one of the speedy rationales disallowed at WP:RFU. The old revisions should not have been restored, as the redirect should've been remade from scratch once the original reasons for deletion were addressed, which wasn't until a couple days ago. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Utopes! What should I do to address this error? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not particularly sure how as I'm not an admin. But all the revision history prior to October 30th should stay deleted as those revisions were deleted by consensus. Maybe that's an option somewhere in the toolkit; unsure. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clovermoss: Can you help? I seem to have screwed up here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well what I would normally do is just create the redirect at the title instead of undeleting the page, like you would at any other redlinked page, if consensus changed. I've deleted the undeleted page for now, but I'm a bit worried that this might cause issues now that you sent the recreated version to RfD? This isn't really a situation I've encountered before so it might be best to get a second opinion as well. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Theleekycauldron: Help? :sad eyes: Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I'm not entirely sure WP:UDP would cover what Utopes is talking about, but yes, it is best not to restore old revisions when undeleting a page for a reason like this. I think the best course of action here is for Clovermoss to undelete only the revisions from Fieari's creation and after, since there's an RfD in progress (and it's trending towards keep). I would do it myself, but don't really want to run into any WP:WHEEL concerns. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: I give you explicit permission to fix whatever it is I did. I'm tired and need to sleep. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
done :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Theleekycauldron, the aspect of WP:UDP I was referring to was where it says In the case of pages deleted as a result of summary decisions and not following community discussions, where it implies that undeletion should be done only for the soft-deletion rationales listed at WP:UNDELETE. For overturning material deleted from a community discussion, UDP says this practice should be made at Wikipedia:Deletion review, not by single-person request. I'm glad everything is taken care of no-harm-no-foul, and I think this was a good learning moment for everyone involved (me included!). CSD tags remaining in page histories can often a touchy subject, so unless there was a reason why the initial tag was incorrect, I hoped this edit could stay deleted. Thank you for your help! Utopes (talk / cont) 05:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bandra Terminus–Bhuj AC Superfast Express

[edit]

Hi Significa, do you mind if you check real quick if Bandra Terminus–Bhuj AC Superfast Express is substantially identical to the version deleted at AfD two months ago? Just curious since I can't see the deleted page and I want to be cautious with my G4 nominations. Thanks, Fathoms Below (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fathoms Below! I appreciate you reaching out and being cautious about your G4s! I checked the article, and it differs from the one deleted via discussion two months ago, though the lead is the same. The primary differences in content are the "Schedule" and "Routes and halts" sections. The references for the new article are different, but none have been published since the AfD. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Significa liberdade! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and Christmas Island AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

Hello! I saw you edited one of the articles I wrote. An editor has falsely accused me of a conflict of interest when I have nothing to do with any of the three companies I wrote articles for. They claim they contain promotional language. They started a discussion on one of the talk pages but not the other two so I have done so. Could you review the articles and help resolve any issues so the label can be removed? The discussions are at Talk:Alto (rideshare), Talk:Tock (company), and Talk:Peerspace. PazSeguro (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PazSeguro (talk page watcher) Just FYI, it's best to keep discussions in one spot so everyone can keep better track of it. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Significa_liberdade&oldid=1256416703"