User talk:Sc2353

"Official Website" did not link to subjects website. Please Forward. Apologies, Never edited before — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:460:1A50:F8B6:2F47:1FAF:93A7 (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sc2353, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sc2353! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like RhinosF1 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Last Temptation of Christ (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 00:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 00:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOTBROKEN

I see you are fixing page title errors. By that you are changing links from a redirect to an article the actual title of the article and then piping it so that it reads as the redirect. There is no reason to do that. The redirects make the code cleaner. Please stop fixing links that are not broken. ~ GB fan 11:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: J–K, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karakum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: U–W, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Walk Among the Tombstones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of LGBT characters in television and radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Lawrence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of LGBT characters in television and radio

Appreciate your interest in adding missing names to the list and other cleanup, but can you make more than just one edit per session so that the edit history does not look like this? Also, there is no need to update all the citation needed template dates to the current month & year; in doing so, you lose the record of the date when citations were originally requested. Thank you. Pyxis Solitary yak 08:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Animated film != children's film

While a few of your re-categorizations are fine, you are being a bit too aggressive. A film like The Lego Movie or Wreck-it Ralph are not children's films, and so it is inappropriate to change the categorization like that. --Masem (t) 04:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I the ones I've spot checked are okay, but consider what the film's ratings might be - a PG film is not going to be a children's film. And even some G-rated films are aimed for families or general audiences. --Masem (t) 04:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Expression error

I notice you have been editing the following:

Please search each of those pages for "error" to see there are a couple of problems that I'm hoping you can fix. Thanks. Johnuniq (talk) 05:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 will become a Sci-fi year

I hope will be in the year 2020 as a sci-fi year, not so politically correct towards 2020 in film! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.241.92.57 (talk) 03:41, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of dramatic television series with LGBT characters

Fyi: re Page size. Pyxis Solitary (yak) 03:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just had to modify your categorization of PCU (film) as well, as there was no mention of "teen comedy" within the text of the article and AFI makes no reference of that genre. Please be more careful in your categorizations going forward. DonIago (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Why did you remove the "1970s drama films" category from a 1973 Soviet war drama film Only "Old Men" Are Going Into Battle? I have reverted your edit. — UnladenSwallow (talk) 00:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shrek Forever After. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are continuing to add or modify categories in manners unsupported by the article's content. Please be more careful going forward. DonIago (talk) 17:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For all your hard work in adding all the extra film categories to articles. French drama films to Belgian thriller films and everything inbetween. Nice one! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:14, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing R-rated films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Pie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020s thriller drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:2020s thriller drama films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year! Sc2353
	Hi Sc2353 I hope that by 2020 I will achieve everything that is proposed and be a spectacular year for you. Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year, Bradford (Talk) 05:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020s adventure drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:2020s adventure drama films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marius is multilingual?

Hi, Sc2353, I have seen Marius (1931 film) 2½ times, & I do not recall anything but French being spoken in the movie. I was surprised to see that you added Category:1930s multilingual films to the article. Peaceray (talk) 07:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saw VI category

Why did you remove the American horror film category from Saw VI [1]? – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 05:06, January 15, 2020‎ (UTC)

Jennifer Lee

Let me tell you about Jennifer Lee, she's a bad guy, and she's destroying our competition with Frozen II. For your own good, you must tell the world to pull all theatrical releases of Frozen II! 2601:197:C181:B70:D4B2:D095:27D9:5950 (talk) 21:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for providing vital information about the 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak! Timwi (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canadian musical fantasy ilms

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian musical fantasy ilms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spanish Western (genre) action films

A tag has been placed on Category:Spanish Western (genre) action films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of film sequels by box-office improvement

The article List of film sequels by box-office improvement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Multiple issues including failing WP:LISTN (this metric/mode of comparison does not seem to be used by any WP:Reliable sources external to Wikipedia) and lacking consistent WP:LISTCRITERIA that are supported by reliable sources. See Talk:List of film sequels by box-office improvement#Multiple issues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TompaDompa (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Western comedy-drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:Western comedy-drama films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Year-specific film categories

Hi. Why do you remove year-specific categories (as you did here with Category:1979 comedy films and Category:1979 drama films and here with Category:1946 drama films, for example) when organizing categories of film articles? These are very important categories and I see no reason to remove them. snapsnap ^(talk) 15:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear Sc2352! Can you check an article Arrambam change from Category:Pregnancy films to Category:Indian pregnancy films? Thank you! --217.66.156.135 (talk) 17:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you check an article Veeram (2014 film) removed Category:Films shot in Switzerland amd add Category:2010s action comedy films and Krrish 3? Thank you! --217.66.158.228 (talk) 08:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Indian romantic action films? Thank you! --217.66.158.236 (talk) 13:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Indian erotic horror films? Thank you! --217.66.158.182 (talk) 11:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Indian teen romance films? Thank you! --217.66.154.31 (talk) 10:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:American erotic horror films? Thank you! --217.66.159.192 (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dutch musical drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:Dutch musical drama films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korean crime comedy-drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean crime comedy-drama films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Films about domestic violence? Thank you! --178.71.162.78 (talk) 18:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 15:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		You appear to be finished with your film category editing. Excellent work! Scorpions13256 (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbie Carter

Regarding this edit. Note that the article has been recreated today Gabbie Carter. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2353! Can you check with categories of article Janbaaz 1986? Thank you! --178.71.162.78 (talk) 11:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate gracious response to undoing some of your edits

I had made a number of edits to entries in the category 1950s 3D films as well as 1960s and 1980s. It overcomplicates things to divide them year by year and doesn't add any clarity or understanding. If we were talking about hundreds of films per decade, I would support your change. Thanks, and keep up the good work! Bolesey (talk) 02:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1953 3D films

A tag has been placed on Category:1953 3D films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1954 3D films

A tag has been placed on Category:1954 3D films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teen comedy

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Indian teen comedy films? Thank you! --178.71.162.78 (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Indian horror fantasy films? Thank you! --178.71.162.78 (talk) 10:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What makes "Indignation" an LGBT-related film?

I just watched the film (with subtitles, even!), then read the plot description in the article to make sure I didn't miss anything. I was just going to remove the categories, but since that might spark an edit war I decided to ask you first. TGGP (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays to my favorite category editor

Scorpions13256 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

)

Currently

I was editing an article from an older film and noticed the Rotten Tomatoes score had been updated only last week.[2] I see you made the edit. I'd like to make small request. If you are updating any other old film articles, and see the word "currently" I would appreciate if you could delete it. Unfortunately the word "currently" fails to follow the guidelines about using relative time words WP:RELTIME but also is bad writing because it is vague and unhelpful. (If you feel it is absolutely necessary you could follow the strict recommendations of the guidelines and write "As of January 2021" but most editors don't think that is necessary.)

I hope you can take WP:RELTIME] into consideration if you are updating Rotten Tomatoes scores in other articles. Thanks. -- 109.76.213.6 (talk) 05:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:American swashbuckler films? Thank you! --89.110.12.91 (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: N–O, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Night Journey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:British spy comedy-drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:British spy comedy-drama films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: L, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucifer Rising.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same Title Formatting

Hey, hope all is well. I noticed your recent edit to List of films: H where you put all the movies titled "Honeymoon" into one grouping. If you go to my talk page, you will notice I was doing the same thing and Ionmars10 informed me that I had missed a request for comment where they decided to only group movies that are remakes or from the same source material. So in other words, all the movies "Hamlet" based on the Shakespeare play, will be grouped together, but all the movies named "Honeymoon" (as long as they have no connection) will not be. Just wanted to point that out. After Ionmars10 informed me of that, I started trying to abide by it, but I don't have a strong opinion either way (I actually probably prefer grouping them like you just did because fixing all of them to the new format will take a millennium). But all these pages need some strong formatting rules and consistency in general. One thing I noticed recently is that we have no real consistency in how we treat colons, commas, etc. when they are in the middle of a movie title so all the pages seem to treat them differently and you have to figure out what the rule is on that page to be consistent. --Tryout 444 (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:French historical action films? Thank you! --178.66.120.153 (talk) 12:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: T, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tomorrow and Tomorrow.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Icelandic fantasy drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:Icelandic fantasy drama films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:American post-apocalyptic films? Thank you! --89.110.19.198 (talk) 10:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Zealand apocalyptic films has been nominated for merging

Category:New Zealand apocalyptic films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American martial arts action

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:American martial arts action? Thank you! --92.100.30.0 (talk) 14:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iranian silent short films

A tag has been placed on Category:Iranian silent short films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Superhero action films

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Superhero action films? Thank you! --92.100.30.0 (talk) 08:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:Italian erotic horror films? Thank you! --09:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.100.30.0 (talk)

Sports

Hi i am currently working on Draft:List of most expensive sports films just wondering if ypu want to give me a hand P+T Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 09:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bulgarian war drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:Bulgarian war drama films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The en dash for ranges

Regarding this general cleanup you performed, can you please use the en dash for page ranges instead of the hyphen? See MOS:DASH, especially MOS:RANGE, for guidance. Thanks! Binksternet (talk) 04:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1890s Western (genre) comedy films has been nominated for deletion

Category:1890s Western (genre) comedy films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation

Please ensure that categories you add to articles are supported by the article's content and sources to comply with WP:CAT. You have been told about this before by Doniago and others. You have created Category:Western (genre) comedy-drama films and a by decade subset. These are almost certainly certainly superfluous given that Comedy Westerns are clearly defined as exceptions to the main Western genre which is entirely dramatic. Of course, as in all of John Wayne's films for example, there are usually elements of humour but that does not make them comedies or "comedy-dramas". The concept of comedy-drama did not exist until the 1970s and films such as Oh, Johnny! (1918) or Lady from Louisiana (1941) cannot be categorised in that way. The former is a comedy set in the American West, the latter is a Western drama with elements of comedy. AFI, for example, classifies the former as "Comedy, Western" and the latter simply as "Drama" (not even "Western"). As Doniago said to you above, please be more careful with your categorisations in future. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Western (genre) drama films has been nominated for merging

Category:American Western (genre) drama films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Western (genre) drama films by decade has been nominated for merging

Category:Western (genre) drama films by decade has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Scorpions13256 (talk) 18:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lost Western (genre) drama films has been nominated for merging

Category:Lost Western (genre) drama films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Western (genre) drama films by country has been nominated for discussion

Category:Western (genre) drama films by country has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Western (genre) mystery films

A tag has been placed on Category:Western (genre) mystery films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1900s Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:1900s Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1920s Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:1920s Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1930s Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:1930s Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1960s Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:1960s Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1970s Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:1970s Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indian Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:Indian Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1940s Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:1940s Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1950s Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:1950s Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American Western (genre) crime films

A tag has been placed on Category:American Western (genre) crime films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Western (genre) action films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Western (genre) action films has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 20:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Western (genre) adventure films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Western (genre) adventure films has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 20:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Western (genre) thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:Western (genre) thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Zealand action horror films

A tag has been placed on Category:New Zealand action horror films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:SMALLCAT

I have noticed that you are continuing to create film categories. If you read WP:SMALLCAT, you will find that we are not supposed to create categories that will never be heavily populated with articles. We don't need a category for New Zealand action comedy-drama films because it is so specific. Please take this into account when creating new categories.

Also, your categories on Western drama films were deleted because all Western films are technically drama films. Just because an article has two genres, doesn't automatically mean a category needs to be created for them.

Thank you for your time. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hong Kong sports comedy-drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:Hong Kong sports comedy-drama films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1960s war thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:1960s war thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Czech war thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:Czech war thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Portuguese action adventure films

A tag has been placed on Category:Portuguese action adventure films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American romantic action films

Dear Sc2352! Can you make Category:American romantic action films? Thank you! --178.71.221.50 (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian action comedy films

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian action comedy films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 17:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1950s crime action films

A tag has been placed on Category:1950s crime action films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 18:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korean horror drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean horror drama films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Azerbaijani war drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:Azerbaijani war drama films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:LGBT-related Western (genre) films has been nominated for deletion

Category:LGBT-related Western (genre) films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Malaysian sports comedy films

A tag has been placed on Category:Malaysian sports comedy films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1940s war thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:1940s war thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest-grossing films based on video games made by Fortunewriter

Thank you for helping me with editing my page or updating box office counts because it makes me stressed about working on the video games list, after my first list page, the List of highest-grossing adult animated films, which was almost inactive for one month and had nothing more to do it. Another unaccounted editor, who also edits the whole page, wants me to edit the highest-grossing films based on theater or tv series but decides to wait first. Fortunewriter (talk) 04:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TV movies

You be helping a look with List of highest-grossing films based on video games and wondering if u could also help with Draft:List of highest-grossing films based on television series

92.236.253.249 (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:War thriller films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:War thriller films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 August 26#Category:War thriller films. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DonIago (talk) 21:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:War thriller films by decade

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:War thriller films by decade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_26#Category:War_thriller_films. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:War thriller films by country

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:War thriller films by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_26#Category:War_thriller_films. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Norwegian science fiction thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:Norwegian science fiction thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of films: A-D

The article List of films: A-D has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to the table at Lists of films#By title

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darcyisverycute (talk) 07:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Haha

See what I did there? You should try installing Cat-a-lot to make editing easier for you. It makes editing categories less tedious. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot This link might be helpful. Thank you for your contributions. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It definitely was! Sc2353 (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave the rest up to you. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20th century professional wrestlers

A tag has been placed on Category:20th century professional wrestlers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestlers by century

Please next time use speedy renaming for the categories that lack a hypen, the way you have done it disconects the categories from their Wikidata item. ★Trekker (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indian female bodybuilders

A tag has been placed on Category:Indian female bodybuilders indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:55, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doom (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not convert redirects to piped links

Hi. Your edit was not general cleanup. Please read WP:NOPIPEDLINK and WP:NOTBROKEN. --Mann Mann (talk) 03:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the message. I truly apologize for any inconvenience. Sc2353 (talk) 03:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I myself did such mistake in the past. Redirects are the essential part of WP. Actually redirects make the source of an article clean and readable. If you read the linked guidelines, they explain when you can use piped links. For example, these two are acceptable piped links: Michelle Williams and Michelle Williams. In some situations, piped links are necessary. For example, take a look at Britt Baker#All Elite Wrestling (2019–present). As you see, Double or Nothing (2021) => Double or Nothing, AEW Rampage => Rampage, Double or Nothing (2022) => Double or Nothing. Good luck! --Mann Mann (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Highest grossing superhero films

Can you please remove the green background of the movie doctor strange in the multiverse of madness in the highest grossing franchises as it is currently not playing. Harharshit (talk) 04:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2353! Can you make category Category:Urdu-language Indian films? Thank you! --89.110.21.55 (talk) 08:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2353! Can you make category Category:Urdu-language Pakistani films? Thank you! --89.110.21.55 (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sc2353! Can you make category Category:American romantic horror films? Thank you! --2A00:1FA0:8489:718:D822:D4DE:3D3C:520D (talk) 15:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1920s horror drama films

A tag has been placed on Category:1920s horror drama films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spanish romantic musical films

A tag has been placed on Category:Spanish romantic musical films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kevin Sullivan (wrestler), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 02:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Sc2353!

Happy New Year!

Sc2353,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 23:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I wish you and all other contributors the same! Sc2353 (talk) 23:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 23:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Sc2353!

Happy New Year!

Sc2353,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Turkish science fiction thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:Turkish science fiction thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Silent thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Silent thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:LGBT-related thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion

Category:LGBT-related thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thriller drama films by country has been nominated for deletion

Category:Thriller drama films by country has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2020s thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion

Category:2020s thriller drama films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nepalese short documentary films

A tag has been placed on Category:Nepalese short documentary films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest-grossing superhero films

Can u pls add the green background in Dceu franchise, shazam fury of the gods and the Shazam franchise....please. Harharshit (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1910s spy thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:1910s spy thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani films about revenge

Dear Sc2353! Can you make Category Category:Pakistani films about revenge? Thank you! --92.100.208.128 (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello Sc2353!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soviet spy thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:Soviet spy thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

<decade><language> films

DareshMohan has created various articles which are under categorized, mostly missing essential categories like Category:2000s Kannada-language films and Category:2000s Telugu-language films. When free could you please resolve this? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comdey

I started a new discussion on Talk:List of highest-grossing comedy films and wondering if you would like to get involved

Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the King's court!

File:In the Court of the Crimson King - 40th Anniversary Box Set - Front cover.jpeg	The Award for the King's of Crimson
	Thank you for editing King Crimson's page!! Keep on editing! I hope this special award gives you motivation! Babysharkboss2 was here!! 13:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gandalf Murphy and the Slambovian Circus of Dreams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Americana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll fix it immediately. Sc2353 (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mixed-gender trios

A tag has been placed on Category:Mixed-gender trios indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what is wrong with you and your categories?

Wikipedia's categories are mostly useless. You seem to be on a mission to make them even stupider than they were, by breaking them down into sub-sub-sub categories that serve no purpose at all, unless making the world less informed is the purpose. CAVincent (talk) CAVincent (talk) 23:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No explanationn on deleting Tito Santana

Hi, I noticed that you deleted Tito Santana from the Oldest Wrestlers list with no reason why. There is more than one website that said that he is 70 and is still wrestling. If you do this again please explain. Kingzwest (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

I don't remember deleting him. If I did, I truly apologize. Sc2353 (talk) 00:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem it's all good! I appreciate your edits and updates Sc2353 keeping the page active. Take care! Kingzwest (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

Category:English-language Amazon Prime Video original films has been nominated for deletion

Category:English-language Amazon Prime Video original films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 10:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Action films

I am working on Draft:List of highest grossing action films and wondering if you want to get involved

Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll see what I can do. Sc2353 (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English-language Amazon Prime Video original programming has been nominated for merging

Category:English-language Amazon Prime Video original programming has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 2pou (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken edit

Magnapop are not from Minnesota. Please undo this. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I truly apologize. Sc2353 (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pobody's nerfect. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century professional wrestlers has been nominated for renaming

Category:21st-century professional wrestlers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: F, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Funhouse (film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Musical groups named after Tolkien works has been nominated for deletion

Category:Musical groups named after Tolkien works has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 16:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Romanian musical fantasy films

A tag has been placed on Category:Romanian musical fantasy films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apollo 11 (film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films: L, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Level Five.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian silent feature films

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian silent feature films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terror Train

Let me know if you are interested in reviewing Terror Train for GA.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)MagiccatthemovieS[reply]

Dear Sc2353! Can you make a category Danish films remade in other languages? Thanks in advance! 92.100.164.42 (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Film categories

I've been doing a great a job adding categories such as Surviving American silent films lately! In addition to adding other categories to certain Wikipedia pages, can you please help me in terms of adding this category to the pages of American silent films that are known to survive today? CRussG (talk) 03:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 4 § Category:Crime action films

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 4 § Category:Crime action films on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 12:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing categories

Just asking, Why do you remove categories from chocolate bar pages? TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deaths from prostate cancer in Israel

A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths from prostate cancer in Israel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thelma (2024)

Really, why is Wikipedia against my edits? It's the truth! Or should we wait until the movie comes out? Ebb1993 (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion

Category:19th-century professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion

Category:20th-century professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century female professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion

Category:20th-century female professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century male professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion

Category:20th-century male professional wrestlers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1960s masala films

A tag has been placed on Category:1960s masala films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That one guy

That IP Troll needs to go to h33l 166.181.85.154 (talk) 19:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

h3ll

166.181.85.154 (talk) 19:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion notification

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Even after discarding !votes based on the current content rather than the notability of such a list, we are still left with valid arguments on both sides, and no consensus materializing after three weeks. Feel free to renominate in three months. Owen× ☎ 21:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of highest-grossing sports films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic fails WP:LISTCRIT, as there is no reliable source on how an items appears on the list. Interpretation of what is or is not a sports film comes off as failing WP:OR. See discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_79 in 2022 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#List of highest-grossing sports films here in 2024. Two years ago, the article was discussed for deletion, since then, per the second discussion topic this year it has been described as being in a worse state, specifically due to WP:OR, as there is no clear definition of what is or is not a sports film, the list is made up of material selected per choice by editors. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Sports, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, these sources seem to discuss the articles subject [3], [4], [5]. Esolo5002 (talk) 16:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
while a quick Google search will supply anyone with similar lists, thats not the issue with the article, it's that definition of what the genre is is not clear, and the inclusion of films is up to debate. These lists don't even agree with each other, so how do we classify this? (one lists the Pixar film Cars as the highest grossing, while the other lists The Blind Side, list can't be properly built upon vague interpretations on highest grossing if there is statements like this. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obviously. My favorite ridiculous entry is Babe - sheepdog trials. Barry Wom (talk) 17:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
keep if there something that someone thinks should not be there or a film that should bring it up on the talk page and it can be discussed Fanoflionking3 (talk) 18:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not that one user or another decides whether a film belongs on the list, it's that there is no general consensus on what type of film belongs. As it can't be properly classified due to a lack of significant coverage, the list is unsustainable. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the person who first brought this up. This isn't an issue of "theres coverage for it" its that it is a definitional impossibility that conflicts with sports films and list of sports films. And it isn't something that can be fixed either by going through it and saying what is or is not a sports film based on sourcing because the whole thing is a failed exercise that cannot be undone. It's not even a split list as its contents contradict the other lists its supposedly split from. As an encyclopedia this article is so all over the place that while everyone here is debating Babe i'm noticing that according to it the top sports films of all time are Inside Out 2 and the entire Fast and the Furious series alongside the Dragon Ball anime. We could go into a deep philosophical discussion about "what is a sport anyway" but instead this article exists as a fork from sports movies for no reason. –– Lid^(Talk) 03:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bring up Babe is about sheepdog trail, sheepdog trails are considered a sport see about sheepdog trail being sports https://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2006/07/24/sheepdog_trials_feature.shtml Fanoflionking3 (talk) 20:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm not in denial of it being treated as a sport, what is and what isn't a sport film is less abundantly clear, so we can't just apply items like this. It's not clear what constitute the sports film genre per the links earlier that have different criteria. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Meets Wp:NLIST (Sources covering that very topic exist, see GNews hits, for example) and can be considered a WP:SPLITLIST -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So we need a definition for a sports film then (i always considered that t being about a sport event or training for a event) Babe (using this as example) is about babe training for a sheep dog trail then complete in the trail. Fanoflionking3 (talk) 21:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with the genre is that is vague and unspecific. As shown by the two links above, there is no obvious connection between what is and what isn't. This is why an editor above may laugh at the idea of Babe being a sports film, while other may not. We can have our own personal definitions, but as that's not categorizable, we can't say what is higher grossing than the other. If a film were specifically about baseball we might be able to have some sort of list, but that would be relatively fringe. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Somethings are clearly sports film (rockey for example), whiles others could be question (babe for example) using babe a done a sample of what we could do.Fanoflionking3 (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We could do something like this, we do not need to every film just any witch someone question. Fanoflionking3 (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rank	Film	Year	Worldwide gross	Ref	Sport(s)
1	Babe^[a]	1995	$254,134,910	^[2]	Sheepdog trial

I think the talk page would be more appropriate for this, as the genre does not seem to be very specific, I don't think a list like this can be really be built on any foundation without some more strict details of what the genre may include. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Notes

^ in the film Babe, Babe the pig trains to take part in a sheepdog trail, sheepdog trails are considered a sport^[1]

Keep as a notable stand-alone list topic even though the list's current contents and approaches are garbage. The problem is defining a sports film as opposed to films that have sports in part, like considering Forrest Gump a sports film is WP:UNDUE. I do oppose the more complex and cross-categorization lists that are embedded in this list article per WP:NLIST since some just get plain indiscriminate. I would support a hard-ass culling of this list. Regardless, there are reliable sources talking about highest-grossing sports movies, so the scope is 100% tenable. We have to overcome the sloppiness of this draft. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there being reliable sources talking about highest-grossing sports movies necessarily means that the scope is 100% tenable. If those sources do not agree what counts as sports movies and what does not, there does not exist a consensus scope, but an equivocation. Do the sources actually agree on the scope in a way that makes for list criteria that are clear-cut and enforceable here? TompaDompa (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course the scope is 100% tenable. The problem is with how to present the details. We definitely have reliable sources writing about the highest-grossing sports films. Do we see these sources naming Forrest Gump and Babe as sports films? Or is it certain editors being ridiculously and erroneously pedantic here? Furthermore, reliable sources are not published with Wikipedia suitability in mind. So can we find a way to work with their coverage? Other approaches here could be to avoid an overall list and instead have various embedded lists by sports (e.g., highest-grossing baseball films). Or we could redirect to just sports film and write some prose saying what has been identified as highest-grossing films in the sports genre and not commit to a table. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we have different ideas about what it means for the scope to be tenable. If the best we can do is redirect to just sports film and write some prose saying what has been identified as highest-grossing films in the sports genre and not commit to a table, I would not consider the scope to be tenable. I would not even consider the scope to be tenable if we have to avoid an overall list. I'm sure we can find somewhere on Wikipedia to include the words "highest-grossing sports film(s)" with some relevant content, but that's a much lower bar. TompaDompa (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think TompaDompa's suggestion might be best. Being the third...fourth...fifth highgest grossing sports film is not something commonly applied to any film as an achievement and would be unmeasurable. Being the highest grossing sports film of all time or something is something you could potentially cover. The rest is just numbers games that we can't apply as with even sourced material above, there appears to be no consensus to what is and what isn't considered a sports film from person to person. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'll quote myself from roughly a year ago over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highest-grossing films based on television series: It is plain to see that this article, as so many box office lists before it, was inspired by the only such list on Wikipedia that is actually of high quality: List of highest-grossing films (a WP:Featured list). The problem with the proliferation of these lists is that they are created without understanding what it is that makes that list work, and they often just copy the structure without considering whether it is appropriate for the newly-created list—or indeed, considering whether the new list should exist at all. The result is that we have a plethora of poorly maintained, straight-up bad lists with myriad problems including—mainly—sourcing issues. This is, well, churnalism—or I suppose online one would call it content farming. It is the assembly of pure WP:RAWDATA by way of WP:Original research at the whims of Wikipedia editors who have mined box office databases for the data and come up with a new angle from which to slice it more-or-less arbitrarily. It is a scourge.
As for what should be done about this list, specifically, if it is to be kept in any form whatsoever (be it as a stand-alone article or as part of some other article) it categorically needs to be demonstrated that it is actually possible to have inclusion criteria that are unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources per WP:LISTCRITERIA, or in other words that there actually exists some kind of consensus among the sources about what belongs on the list and what does not. What we currently have fails the requirement from WP:LISTCRITERIA to Avoid original or arbitrary criteria that would synthesize a list that is not plainly verifiable in reliable sources. That goes for a lot of these lists. TompaDompa (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 16:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is just a mirror of BoxOfficeMojo with some summaries ... that doesn't update as often. No effort to indicate when these statistics are captured or how out-of-date they might be. Or how they might compare across decades. And so the information is better kept at its source, and such an article offers no value. The inclusion criteria is between absurd and unenforced: there are silly entries (like *Babe*). But also entries for movies that haven't earned more than $10 million -- how could they possibly appear on any "highest-grossing" list? *Ben-Hur* for the "sport" of chariot racing? Come on. -- mikeblas (talk) 04:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see what value this article provides to the reader either. Reflecting the comment above, it is impossible to keep up to date. The problem is effective sourcing is another problem. I don't see its value as a standalone article. scope_creep^Talk 13:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that this debate is not about whether the current contents of the page are to be retained, but whether the list could be compiled such that it meets LISTCRIT and other relevant guidelines.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but overhaul. Passes NLIST: "Highest Grossing Sports Movies" CNBC, "These Are the Top 10 Highest-Grossing Sports Movies" Sports Illustrated, "Highest-Grossing Sports Movies" Forbes, "Can you guess what the highest-grossing sports movies are?" Sports Illustrated again. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English-language romance fantasy films

A tag has been placed on Category:English-language romance fantasy films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 00:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pakistani musical comedy films

A tag has been placed on Category:Pakistani musical comedy films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ditz (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Experimental hardcore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2006/07/24/sheepdog_trials_feature.shtml

[Babe-3] "Babe".

[Babe-2] the film Babe, Babe the pig trains to take part in a sheepdog trail, sheepdog trails are considered a sport^[1]

[a]

[2]

[1]