User talk:RandomCanadian

December 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 04:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello RandomCanadian! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomislav of Croatia

Hello RandomCanadian. I believe you may have it in reverese. There was not consensus on the removal of the long standing image. It was not a newly added controversy addition. Also the reasoning to remove it doesn’t seem consistent as articles like Solomon have a contemporary image for a individual almost a millennium prior. I don’t see why the Tomislav painting was suddenly a major issue after the many years of was on the page. And plenty of other old figure articles have portraits from pater times. I see IP addresses verbally abusing each other but not rational dialogue. So I don’t know how to still feel about the deleting of the image. One IP claimed it was a Nazi painting? Or Nazi propaganda. Of which I am unaware if true. OyMosby (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@OyMosby: RandomCanadian has been indef blocked for almost a year and will not be able to respond to this. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see now. Thank you. OyMosby (talk) 00:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it does't say that tpa was revoked in the log so he probably could respond here (and here only) if he wanted to, but is he likely to after all this time is another question... - wolf 00:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are missed

Not entirely sure how/when you were banned but your efforts are missed. I hope you consider appealing in the future – Aza24 (talk) 07:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the checkuser block was quite surprising, since you were a user in good standing, and inactive for months. I join Aza in encouraging you to appeal it. You were certainly a net positive around here and I would welcome you back. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I join fellow editors a in encouraging you to appeal. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]