User talk:QuadriSyedSahab

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

February 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QuadriSyedSahab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m working for Sufism and belongs to Kolkata, I can’t understand how can anyone block me of being a Bihari and a user who was interested in Politics and paid editing, I have basically created articles for dead people and sufi saints, who will pay me for this? Having the name “Syed and Hussain” cannot be an evidence this is a title and surname used by Lacs of People within India only. There’s no discussion in the SPI also, previously User:MarioGom had run a CU on me when a user tried to block me and others, I wasn’t a Sock so i came out of it, and the user who provided you evidence thought the same that’s why there’s no discussion about it. It’s really attacking on a User who’s participating in Sufism related articles. It should be clear to me also, that why i was blocked with a user who I don’t even know, just by having same title? I’m a sufi and that user was working for money, you can all of my contributions and let me know if you get any of them which is paid, I’m a follower of Sufi order and Islam, I’m not lying and I’m not profitable from Wikipedia but I’m using my free time to enhance the number of articles on it, i created around 180 articles on English Wikipedia and many of other languages i know, in very less time, because I’m totally interested in it. Hope you’ll understand, and I’ll also ask the user who had expressed a concern that I’m a sock to please provide me some evidences of mine being a sock. Thanks. — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 14:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below; if the user doesn't care about being unblocked why should we? — Daniel Case (talk) 07:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrators considering this request should contact me to receive compiled evidence of sockpuppetry and UPE. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ Rosguill, can you please let me have the evidences? If you can then please. — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 15:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, security through obscurity. I can tell you that the evidence establishes that you have been dishonest with your communications on Wikipedia, and that there really isn't much in the way of a defense that you could provide at this point short of coming clean about the past accounts that you have been linked to, Syed amjad08. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill ~~I know and understand that anti-sufis are working against me. I don’t care if I’m blocked too,~~ i was working without any profit and money. Let another administrator have a look over this, Thanks — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 16:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Daniel Case, as i stated I don’t care because i was working without any profit. I care because i was working for Sufism, all over the Wikimedia foundation. Recently, i started WikiProject Sufism, maybe some of user took it as a challenge to them. Btw, pls go through the evidences and try to unblock or do what you can, i was using my time of Sufism on Wikipedia. — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 12:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QuadriSyedSahab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admins, I'm really very sorry for behaving like this. I actually got frustrated after getting blocked without any actual reason for being blocked. My name may be the same as the blocked one, Syed amjad08 but I'm not that one, i myself went through their contributions and it was totally related to Bihar and Politics where I'm nowhere interested in politics and all on Wiki. I would ask Admins to reconsider my block. — QuadriSyedSahab(T · C 18:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think you are being honest with us. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salmaan Azhari (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoglophie was:

I'd like to see a neutral person submitting this draft, as it was submitted by a sockpuppet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salmaan Azhari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

zoglophie^•talk• 14:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QuadriSyedSahab! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! zoglophie^•talk• 14:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Barelvi Students organizations has been nominated for splitting

Category:Barelvi Students organizations has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 04:04, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]