User talk:Pudor

Seminary School Claim

You added this to the Mike Huckabee article "This seminary supports intelligent design and reinforced Huckabee's well-known anti-evolutionism" I placed a citation needed tag on the sentence. The sentence has two claims 1. that the seminary school supports intelligent design. and 2. that going to Southwestern reinforced Huckbee's well know anti-evolutionism. 1 is probably true, but you need a source and 1 can not be inferred. That is, no original research. Just because Dempski teaches there, it does not mean that the school officially endorses intelligent design. 2 may or may not be true, but it definitely not sourced. Furthermore, Huckabee would take offense to be characterized as believing in "anti-evolutionism". So you need a source on that if you choose to use those words. His recent public comment on evolution suggest that he is not "anti-evolutionism" because he is not willing to fight about it in the public square. Even his older comments as Governor were more "pro-creationism" rather than "anti-evolutionism". He wished that public school students receive exposure to the theories of creation along side of evolution. Jmegill (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fake Quotes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fake Quotes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake Quotes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Salimfadhley (talk) 11:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 22:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]