Jump to content

User talk:Mirka1989

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Repeated reversions

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Brisbane, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Given you are new, please realise that bold changes are often reverted then subject to discussion on the talk page, as per WP:BRD. This is particularly true of high-profile areas such as city image montages, you will not get anywhere trying to just force your changes through. Your images have issues and also one of them might have copyright issues and may need to be flagged on the Commons. Please suggest your changes on the Brisbane talk page so they can be discussed by editors.Gracchus250 (talk) 06:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Um okay, but seriously you need to chill. My edits were actually very constructive, I don't know why you'd bother changing it when I need to resize the other two images. Thanks fam.--Mirka1989 (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is just the way Wikipedia works, everything is subject to discussion and the input of other editors. Making the initial edits is fine, but they were always going to get reverted and edit warring to get your desired changes through is not constructive editing. You also shouldn't change images if the new ones aren't ready and are both low resolution and in the wrong aspect ratio. I suggest you take your proposed changes to the talk page. I don't have a strong opinion on it, but I would suspect that 1) there will be discussion over the appropriateness of Burnett Lane, and 2) over whether that image of Town Hall is less illustrative than the current one. Gracchus250 (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have just restored the Story Bridge image as it didn't need resizing, looks better than the other one anyway. But left a message on the talk page regarding the other two, + resized those images. Lemme know on there.--Mirka1989 (talk) 12:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]