Jump to content

User talk:LibStar/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13

Equestria Daily

A new deletion review has been created regarding an article you've recently discussed. Dr. WTF (talk) 20:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Eugene Castelle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eugene Castelle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Castelle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Vic49 (talk) 21:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Israel–Finland relations

Hi, I noted your userpage comments on questionable bilateral relations. Therefore, when I saw the above-named new page, I figured you'd be the right person to whom I should direct the article for attention. Some of the stated connections between Finland and Israel seem a bit tenuous to me but I think the article deserves a more qualified set of eyes. Thank you and let me know what you think. Regards, ClaretAsh (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

thanks, I'm busy at the moment, but will take a look. LibStar (talk) 01:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. ClaretAsh (talk) 10:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Tagging

Hi there. I've noticed a couple of times when going to close AfDs that, in cases where multiple articles have been nominated in a single nomination, not all of the articles have been tagged for AfD. Can you make sure in the future that all articles involved in a nomination are tagged? Thanks. :) The Bushranger One ping only 00:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

sure, thanks for letting me know. LibStar (talk) 01:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Elbert Adrain Brinckerhoff

  • All snarking aside, I think I've found enough sourcing to merit withdrawal of this nom, please take a look.[1]. The middle name is actually "Adrain" not "Adrian" (which more recent sources unfortunately use), which led to more sourcing including the National cyclopædia of American biography. --Milowent • hasspoken 19:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Sarcasm

I don't really think that posting sarcastic comments and barnstars on User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )'s talk page is a productive approach. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

far from it, he's being fine work and doing challenging searches. LibStar (talk) 04:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
The posts weren't sarcastic? Oh; they kind of read that way in the context of what was posted there before by you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Reply

I've replied to your comment on my talk page, to keep the conversation in one place. Thanks. — Moe ε 05:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Griffith Lifestyle Centre

Hi. I noticed that you nominated Wyoming Shopping Village for deletion. The shopping center above appears to fail notability guidelines in the same circumstances. What do you think? WP:Articles for deletion/Griffith Lifestyle Centre. 11coolguy12 (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Libstar. I know you and I might not look eye to eye on everything but could you take a look at the Anna Lundh article. And see if it needs to be put up for AfD as I am unsure. Also I agree with you that I should have stated Guatemala instead on Argentina ofcourse, and I hope we can move on and I will definitly take your advice more to heart now. Even though we will probably not agree on every single AfD. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review for Death Valley Driver Video Review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Death Valley Driver Video Review. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Goodvac (talk) 03:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LibStar. You have new messages at WhiteWriter's talk page.
Message added 15:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WhiteWriter speaks 15:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Libstar. Miri Permy Mall is just Opened. I've edited the Shopping section. About the climate section do not change them or undo them. Those section should be remain unchanged. These information I got from weather website and Weather Station based in Miri. I have provided the information but I don't know how to put them on References but it's on the climate section. 

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seagullegg (talk • contribs) 01:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Barnes (minister)

My reading of the AfD was that two established contributors (and one IP with no history) had reviewed the sources and found them sufficient. While the rebuttals were reasonable they did not manage to convince any of the editors who opined for keep. I have not performed my own analysis of the sources and don't have my own opinion on the matter. I made an effort to ignore the irrelevant issues surrounding his more controversial positions. While we certainly don't delete articles on people or movements because we find them stupid, offensive, or controversial, we should also avoid the opposite error of keeping poorly sourced articles on such topics out of a concern to avoid censorship. Eluchil404 (talk) 19:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

copy paste

You tagged Susannah Lattin as a copy paste, but didn't indicate the purported source. I'm trying to look into it, can you tell me which source you think it was lifted from?--SPhilbrickT 18:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

I have a strong reaction to HJ's close

I disagree with the close on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero's 10. I've said so at HJ's talk. BusterD (talk) 11:03, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for National Institute of Technology, Srinagar

An article that you have been involved in editing, National Institute of Technology, Srinagar, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 08:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

AFD repeat

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Valley Driver Video Review (6th nomination) An AFD you participated in last month is at AFD again. Dream Focus 00:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Richard Arthur Norton: Revisiting topic ban; Should it be removed or made indefinite?

Hi LibStar. You participated in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive228#Richard Arthur Norton copyright violations, in which a one-month topic ban on creating new articles and making page moves was imposed on Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk · contribs). The closing admin has asked for community input at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Richard Arthur Norton: Revisiting topic ban; Should it be removed or made indefinite?. Cunard (talk) 08:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

RFC/U time

Re [2], I think we're past that point, I'll endorse an RFC/U if you want to draft one. Nobody Ent (Gerardw) 11:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

We apparently didn't follow the format quit right, but the deleting admin is willing to restore if you contact them, please see User_talk:Beeblebrox#rfc.2Fu_.3FNobody Ent (Gerardw) 19:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Duncan Gay

Hi. I've added an off topic template tag for an article you've been involved in editing. Discussion is happening here. Your contributions are welcome in order to ensure that the article complies with WP:BLP. Rangasyd (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

NN shopping centres

Here are some more non-notable shopping centres currently in AfD. [3] [4] Till I Go Home (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Davidson, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Davidson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

A suggestion

IMHO, we might transwiki some of the pages we've been deleting previously to Edge MMA. It seems a tragedy to lose all the effort made, even though it appears several of us seem to agree about notability as it regards WP. I've sent a similar suggestion to User:Mtking. BTW, User:WölffReik has now been indef blocked. BusterD (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LibStar. You have new messages at Mtking's talk page.
Message added 21:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Have replied to BusterD at my talk. Mtking (edits) 21:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

CSD question

I see the CSD you added to Guar Chempedak but you did not indicate the source. Also, noting that this article has been around since 2007, did you confirm that it wasn't a reverse copyvio?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I came to your page to comment on this as well. G12 deletes are for obvious cases and without a source, or at least a good explanation of why it's a copyvio, it's not appropriate to G12 tag it. I'd also note that particular example was not a valid G12 as, although the current text may well be a copyright violation, there are versions in the history that would not be. Can I suggest you read / re-read the criteria at WP:G12. I looked for but could not find a source so in this instance I made an editorial decision (nothing to do with the possible copyvio) to remove the text in question as it would need a major re-write to become encyclopaedic. Dpmuk (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Your most recent edit on your user page

Is of some concern - you havent travelled overseas at all? SatuSuro 13:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

hardly concerning. It is not encyclopaedic info. I have been to 43 countries, how about you? LibStar (talk) 10:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Bidwill, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Service station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Article about Restaurant Week

Hi. You were involved in a deletion discussion of the previous version of this article I had created. It was deemed low-key and not of notable value and eventually deleted. I have recreated the article with more information, citations and press mentions. Just wanted your feedback on it. Does it meet Wiki standards? Would appreciate your comments and feedback (and help!). Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Bangalore_restaurant_week.Varunr (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

PDXLAN

Hey, we at pdxlan (www.pdxlan.com) are working on getting that article up to snuff (it started as someones college project), however the LAN itself has existed for a decade or so. As you recommended it for deletion I just wanted to understand why. It's a major LAN event (the largest in the northwest US), happens 2-3 times a year, and has gotten media coverage in the past (though I can't personally locate any clips at the moment).

What can I do to make it more "notable"? I don't have an account so i'll check the PDXLAN page later.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.12.175.13 (talk) 00:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Article: Kazantip

Hello, you marked Kazantip as it would need reliable sources, but the only reliable source for the subject is the official page and it's already listed there. Please explain your point or I will remove your mark next week. Thank you. -- Xapmc (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Kazantip: Reliable sources and inline citations

Hello LibStar, please always read the discussion page of the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kazantip before answering.

I think it's better to keep the conversation regarding the article on its discussion page so please write your next answer there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xapmc (talk • contribs) 20:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

As for the inline citations, are you sure it is really required in such an article? Which sources could you imagine in this case?

Sorry but one could suppose you are not really aware of the subject "Kazantip Republic".

I hope your next answer will be exact and concrete.

Thanks in advance, -- Xapmc (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

International relations Israel-Marshall Islands

They have indeed changed the Israel–Marshall Islands relations article so it seem almost tolerable now. What do you think? Student7 (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Embassy

I agree that it probably isn't worth keeping, but it isn't spam. Can't be A7 - suggest PROD. Peridon (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your commitment to ensuring that articles of dubious notability are defended with actual sources and not flimsy puffery. Yaksar (let's chat) 05:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Foreign relations of Malaysia

Please do not reverted to the old colour, you can see for example this Malaysian related template colours. They must be same. — иz нίpнόp  08:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

article: Kazantip

Hello LibStar,

several months ago I edited the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazantip and you provided me your help and support.

Now I see that this commercial company Kazantip GmbH is still trying to put there their advertisement.

They are organising a small festival in Portugal that has nothing to do with the original event except the name.

Sure, I can check the article every day and remove their misleading links.

But maybe it's time to protect that article, as I suggest even much more activity from them within next months.

Tell me what you think and what we can do.

Thank you anyways.

Kind regards,

-- Xapmc (talk) 07:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Notifying about AfD

I just wanted to let you know that it is common courtesy to notify the user who created a certain article that you have place that article up for an AfD process. So that user can get involved in the discussion as he/she presumably is interested. Thank you.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LibStar. You have new messages at Wesley Mouse's talk page.
Message added 14:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wesley Mouse 14:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Statυs (talk) 13:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Marks (psychologist)

I have removed the prod tag you placed on David Marks (psychologist) as it was discussed at AfD back in 2008. I only did this to comply with policy and have no opinion one way or the other on the merits of deletion. If you wish to pursue deletion, please open another AfD. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celina Szymanowska

Regarding your WP:NONINHERIT argument there, would you consider AfDing the Karol Wojtyła (senior)? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

.

There are open tools for monitoring AFD stats, open to everyone by everyone, took me 30 seconds to retrieve your stats. You could look at my stats too. No secret. It's not stalking to look at someone's AFD stats. No more than looking at edit history. If you prefer I not post on your talk page I will stop, thought I was helping you out, you seem defensive though so I will stop posting. However I do monitor literary topics so will continue to be engaged in those AFDs. Green Cardamom (talk) 03:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I just would like for you to clarify why you are on my case about un-sufficient AfD reasoning while at the same time not questioning !votes like this one and many more similar ones. I might be wrong but is it because they are !voting Delete? Just want you to clarify. You should be consistent in your questioning about sufficient reasoning and not selective towards your own stance in AfDs. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

neither of the editors are voting multiple times in 10mins with the same style vote. So doesn't look like blind voting to me. LibStar (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Blackburn

Iwould just like to thank u for the tidy up u did on Blackburn. The deletion was excellent, the site is now no longer an advert for the shopping centre! once again, thanx.Markdarrly (talk) 14:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

no problem. LibStar (talk) 14:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Blackburn

I think that the bit about the council running a legal Gypsy site at Ewood should have been left in the article as it is a notable fact about the town. IMO you have done a fair bit of chopping and you should really seek the opinions of other users before making such sweeping changes. Most of what you deleted needed to go, but the Gypsy bit needs to be put back in. Markdarrly (talk) 09:19, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

large sections of irrelevance not found on town articles should not appear. This does not require consultation, anyone can edit WP. Similarly changes can be reversed. LibStar (talk) 10:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I didnt know that anyone can edit WP, thanks for pointing that out. IMO before a "Cull" of the article is carried out, a consensus should be sought as to the extent of the "Cull". Its called respecting the article and not just running over it with size 9s. Just to say that edits can be reverted makes the edits that you did a waste of time. If people agree on the extent of chopping, less edit warring would happen. Markdarrly (talk) 14:01, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Libstar. In view of your comment "large sections of irrelevance not found on town articles should not appear", can I draw your attention to the guidance offered here, which is something I've also mentioned in the section below. If we try to adhere to the guidance at that project article, with respect to articles at UK settlements, it should reduce the potential for conflict. Kind regards. Beejaypii (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Blackburn - Demography

Hi Libstar. You recently removed information from the Demography section of the Blackburn article with this edit. You may be unaware of this, but there is a project guideline for articles about UK settlements on Wikipedia. In the demography section it recommends the following for potential inclusion:

  • Current population and where the figure is taken from.
  • The ethnic composition.
  • The religious composition.
  • Economic activity of the population.
  • The population change over the last century.
  • A note on social class (strictly where citation allows).
  • Consider including a statistic comparison table.

The information you removed, which I've now restored, is fully referenced and pertains to the economic activity and social class of the population, and its ethnic composition.

Assuming you weren't already aware of it, I hope you'll find the UK settlements guide useful. The Blackburn article was extensively developed a few years ago and largely complies with the advice given there. Beejaypii (talk) 14:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

you erased my comment on my own talk page. Why?

[5] Kindly explained this to me. Dream Focus 09:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Left Right Think-Tank

As you were the last editor to comment on the deletion of the Left Right Think-Tank page I'm commenting here as to the reconsideration of the pages existence, considering it's increasing physical and virtual presence. I've created a temporary page here. Another reason I'm asking for your help is I volunteer for the organization. I want to make this bias clear upfront. If you could help me, or point me in the direction of a neutral admin that would be fantastic, thank you. JakeSpi (talk) 06:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Take a look at Macquarie University, it's full of cruft. All universities have graduates, presidents, research, libraries...oh wait thats why they are called universities... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.205.215 (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Wow its easy, I removed loads of cruft in Macquarie University, connective sentences don't serve to improve readability in articles, they are excess right? Learnt from the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.205.215 (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2012 (UTC) If I continued doing to Macquarie University what you did to National University of Singapore you'd see the whole campus subsection gone(it actually referenced bus stations which you were all sarcastic about), facilities(all universities have facilities right?) but people would question if I had an axe to grind. Do you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.205.215 (talk) 00:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Alan Jones "Died of Shame" controversy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Jones "Died of Shame" controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Jones "Died of Shame" controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop deleting my comments on the AfD. You don't get to take it upon yourself to decide which of other people's comments you'll deign to allow to remain on the page. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion directly goes to gaining consensus on the article, and the deletion process is not based on "votes", it is based on arguments. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
I will raise the matter at WP:ANI since you're at least in breach of the rollback policy. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
You unilaterally deleted my and another user's very relevant discussion without our permission (or at least moved it to an irrelevant place where it would not be read), and then abused your rollback permissions to re-remove it from the page. Yep, that sounds like an issue for WP:ANI to me. (Raised, by the way.) The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion was ongoing, and you most certainly did not have my consent to remove it. Either way, it wouldn't excuse the abuse of your permissions anyway. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

27/12/12 - Criticism Paragraph for Young Liberals (Australia) article

Hello,

I thank you for your interest in this Wikipedia page. I am however concerned about your insistence on the inclusion of what I deem inaccurate/irrelevant material to a section that is highly spurious.

Please see the talk page for the article in question as I am interested in hearing your opinions for its development into the future. Let me be clear, however, in my intention to comprehensively address through escalation the bias in Australian Wikipedia articles and your editing practices particularly with regard to your historical activity on the Young Liberals (Australia) page.

I trust that we will work together to ensure that bias is removed and the integrity of Wikipedia is maintained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veritas80 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Please let me remind you of Wikipedia's policy regarding conflicts of interests that may be influencing your editing choices:


We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

In addition, please read other guidelines such as that pertaining to 'Neutral Point of View' editing. Kind Regards, Veritas80 (talk) 03:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Ken Williams (game developer)

Hi LibStar, I was surprised to see a {{notability}} tag on Ken Williams (game developer). It's not a profession that naturally lends itself to notability or celebrity, but I think he fits the bill, and was also a pioneer in the field. Did you think he should be merged with his wife Roberta Williams or something? I can't imagine he'd have trouble surviving AfD. --BDD (talk) 17:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm removing the tag for now. If you'd like to discuss it further, feel free to contact me on my talk page. --BDD (talk) 16:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laos–Thailand relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Malawi–Malaysia relations

Hello LibStar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Malawi–Malaysia relations, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article has been edited since it was tagged and is no longer a copyvio. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 12:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Replying

Lib, you should add an extra indent to your replies so they do not blend in with the above comments. For example:

whilst sources found are welcome, most of this coverage is routine.this is a passing mention about helping countries "such as colombia", and a few of these sources are based on a 1994 visit by the Colombian deputy agriculture minister. coverage is sporadic and not about an indepth relationship. LibStar (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Instead you should format them either like

whilst sources found are welcome, most of this coverage is routine.this is a passing mention about helping countries "such as colombia", and a few of these sources are based on a 1994 visit by the Colombian deputy agriculture minister. coverage is sporadic and not about an indepth relationship. LibStar (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

or:

  • whilst sources found are welcome, most of this coverage is routine.this is a passing mention about helping countries "such as colombia", and a few of these sources are based on a 1994 visit by the Colombian deputy agriculture minister. coverage is sporadic and not about an indepth relationship. LibStar (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Just thought this might help people spot your comments as I missed a few of yours in the AfD's because they were not indented against the other comments. Mkdwtalk 23:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laos–Thailand relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champassak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

AN/I on Norton

Just in case you missed it in the growing thread, I note my comment there: "LibStar, you might want to make yourself a party to Fram's ArbCom case, since I am sure the relationship between you and he [Norton] at Articles for Deletion will be something that comes up during the process of their collection of evidence and that your activity here has made you a directly involved party. —Carrite." Best regards, —Tim //// Carrite (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Appears you're being stalked

Hi Lib. I discovered something rather strange when going over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of redheads (3rd nomination). It appears this IP has been stalking your nominations and specifically voting against you, and in one case replying to your comment directly. Normally this wouldn't be strange but this IP only !votes in your nominations with no other edits and over a widespread number of days. I've decided to ask for a second opinion at the SPI just in case but I thought you would like to know. Mkdwtalk 07:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Good news. The IP has been blocked per the awesome investigative team at the SPI IRC. See User talk:143.105.49.234. I have gone ahead and struck their edits from the active AfD's. Mkdwtalk 07:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, friend

I have written a proposed remedy to the Richard Arthur Norton affair, to be taken to AN/I in the event that ArbCom defers the case. Since the original thread is hatted, the proposal has been made on his talk page (User_talk:Richard_Arthur_Norton_(1958-_)). As you were a participant in the original thread, I would very much appreciate your comments as to whether the proposed remedy satisfies your concerns. Thanks, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 23:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Closure

For reference, there's also WP:ANRFC which might be of value. I'll also have a look at the AFD itself - maybe a few more opinions will be enough to build a solid WP:CONSENSUS. Cheers mate, Stalwart111 05:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC).

Hey man.

Why can't I add some of the founder section and others into the article La Salle School, Klang ? Correct me if I am wrong. --LeeGuan (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry

Well, sorry about the undo. It is my fault. Thank you.--LeeGuan (talk) 07:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

FYI - Self-reporting BLUDGEON

Per instructions at WP:BLUDGEON, I have decided to "ask an uninvolved administrator their opinion" for your accusation. Personally I don't care, but it seems that the instruction on the page wants me to report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Since you're affiliated with the discussion, I thought it best to let you know. Personally, I think it seems silly to report myself for having a civil discussion, but I guess that's what they are wanting.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Alansohn acrimony

I see Alansohn said "you're sure one f'ed up dude" and "You're already 100 times more of a WP:DICK of any other typical WP:DICKy editor I've seen, and the ratio is rapidly rising well above those ratios as we speak" Can you give me some context where that came from? It wasn't obvious looking at the editing histories.

I've gotten similar complements from him lately too. Toddst1 (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Recent additions of the Citation needed tags to the Marbella article

I've invested a lot of time translating text from the Marbella article at Spanish Wikipedia into English, and in making many subsequent edits to the Marbella article, including adding sources.

Any help I could get from fellow Wikipedians in finding citations would be much appreciated. The Spanish article has Spanish-language sources that can be added to the English one.

Gracias. Carlstak (talk) 03:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armenia–Egypt relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilateral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Sandra Sully

I have given a WP:3RR warning to User:Afterwriting but you have both already violated the three revert rule in your edit war. While WP:BLP gives you some justification for removing unsourced content, there are still better ways of resolving issues than edit-warring. --Michig (talk) 13:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

a disputed claim can be removed regardless if it is a BLP. I gave 2 warnings plus the precise text from WP:BURDEN on the user's talk page. LibStar (talk) 13:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
You failed to engage in any discussion as repeatedly requested and instead resorted to hypocritical warnings on my user page. Afterwriting (talk) 13:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You failed to discuss as well and simply reverted for no reason but to be WP:POINTY and provided no source for high school. LibStar (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

There's no excuse for you refusing to engage in discussion when asked and then resorting to hypocritical warnings for edit warring and an assertion of some selective principles of WP:BURDEN. Afterwriting (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I did not warn you for edit warring. I warned you for adding uncited content. That is not hypocritical. LibStar (talk) 14:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Notability of Japanese ambassadors

In the context established by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susumu Shibata, may I ask you to to take a look at two related articles. I wonder how to measure consensus opinion about Tsukasa Kawada‎ and List of Ambassadors from Japan to Algeria‎? --Ansei (talk) 17:29, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimboomba Thunder

My mistake. Thanks for the note! czar · · 04:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For working tirelessly to prevent Wikipedia from being turned into some sort of United Nations Yellow Pages.
Keep up the great work! Stalwart111 00:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Agree entirely! Great work. Stalwart111 00:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matraville, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thongsavanh Phomvihane

You indicated that you were nominating Thongsavanh Phomvihane for deletion here, yet no notice appears on the Thongsavanh Phomvihane article. Is that an oversight? Or, is something else going on? --Bejnar (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

I've fixed up now. LibStar (talk) 04:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Attributing splits

Hi, LibStar. :)

First, I wanted to thank you for finding and following up with the copyright issues you identified here. This work is not always pleasant (well, okay - hardly ever pleasant), but it's important, and it looks as though the editor has a better understanding now - which is critical. :)

I do see, though, that some of the splits identified in that section remain unattributed. Even though they were done a long time ago, this attribution is necessary, since content on Wikipedia is also under copyright and use of it without complying with the license is also a copyright issue.

I went ahead and took care of List of people from Trieste ([24], [25], [26]) in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. (Not all lists have enough creativity to require attribution, but the descriptions by the names in that list do add that burden.) Can you please take care of the others that were mentioned as well as attributing any other content that you might have moved from one article to another, so we can make sure that lingering copyright issues there are addressed?

Happy to talk about the process if you want, and thanks again for keeping on top of the copyright issue you found. Unpleasantness aside, it's really a good service to Wikipedia. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

thanks for notifying me. I was not aware of this guideline. your approach was far more good faith than the stance of unscintillating (who appears to have some agenda against me). LibStar (talk) 07:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Al-Madinah International University

Al-Madinah International University
Dear Sir,

Hope you doing fine, thank you for your efforts in enhancing Wikiperdia.

Ahmad Ahmad.salah.85 (talk) 03:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

apologies

Sitting in a public library, trying to make head or tail of a damned poor Internet connection on a clunky computer, trying to understand what you are doing with Indonesian articles, for some weird the damned keys stuck on eliminating your user page. I have no idea why or how that happened, so restored the user page. Cheers sats 08:25, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Response

___ Hi LibStar, yes, I am a former member of the Club. Hence interest in it. Freedomfighter142 (talk) 01:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Philippines edu cleanups

Thanks for removing all that nonsense from those articles! DMacks (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


Response from 3O

Hi, I know this is probably not of much use but I felt like responding anyway to your WP:3O request on a user. I've come across many new users like these who don't use talk pages/edit summaries even after I give them the notice. Some users have been here for years, not that active but still editing consistently, and almost never post/reply/use summaries. There is almost zero communication with them and the rest of the community and they seem fine on their own...editing in their preferred topic range, as long as they don't begin editing important articles and begin making unexplained mass changes.

Since edit summaries are mostly recommended but not compulsory, and based on the user's choice, it would be wise let it be as it is. Chances are, if the user in future, makes a big change or gets involved in a content dispute, then in most cases, they end up communicating. If they don't and behave disruptive, then there is a question of WP:competence. For this case, the user's edits were regular and didn't seem contentious....I don't think the lack of summaries here is something to question (yet). Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm a regular volunteer at 3O. I've removed your request because it is about a user's conduct and 3O is not for disputes which are primarily about conduct (or which have not been first thoroughly discussed between the parties, which is also a problem here). The proper forum for conduct disputes is RFCU or ANI. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Katrina Zepps

Hello LibStar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Katrina Zepps, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Has an entry in the ADB. Reasonable assertion of significance. . Thank you. GedUK  13:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:DIPLOMAT

I've started a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Proposal: remove WP:DIPLOMAT. I invite you to comment on the proposal. Pburka (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salisbury North, South Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bunting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Parker Liautaud

Hi LibStar, I thought I'd let you know I left a response for you at this AfD. ☮ ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LibStar/Archive_10&oldid=1147983738"