User talk:Kodster/Archives/2008/August

Wikipedia:Peer review/Windows XP/archive3

I left comments on July 21, do you plan on addressing some of these issues? Let me know if you need some help with the article. — Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 09:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for leaving comments. I don't plan on working on the article, I'm WAY too busy as is. Maybe I'll give it a shot later, but it doesn't look like I'll be working on it in the near future. Cheers. Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 19:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHACK!

Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of disruptive edits, which earn warnings and blocks.

Example

Whack!

The above is a WikiTrout (Oncorhynchus macrowikipediensis), used to make subtle adjustments to the clue levels of experienced Wikipedians.

To whack a user with a wet trout, simply place {{trout}} on their talk page.

«l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get me a lemon and an oven and I'll have one heck of a meal! LOL Sorry, I had no clue about that. I don't do adoptions anymore... Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 19:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit

Hope your enjoying your break. I've been working on the Thriller album, I expanded the lead (per your suggestion) and added a "background" section. On your return could you CE the lead and new section? No need to rush, I don't expect to hear from you within a week or so, but I though I wound ask now in case I forget. After that I might consider taking it to FA if I'm not too busy in real life. Cheers :-) — Realist² (Speak) 23:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, R2! Glad to be back! I'm kind of unpacking and getting everything together, so I won't be able to CE it right now. I'll get back to you when I can. Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 19:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem, take ya time. Glad ya back. I got another article to GA today! Michael Jackson's health and appearance. Still waiting for the review of the 1993 allegations. — Realist² 19:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it! If you need any help with the 1993 allegations, give me a call. :-) Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 13:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm done with the CE. I think the article, with a few minor tweak-ups, could pass as an FA. Fingers crossed! Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 14:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, will get this 1993 allegations to GA then I will nom Thriller for FA. Do you know any websites that would provide critical analysis of this song. I nominated that article for deletion (see the talk page) but after working with another editor on it, I thought it was a worthwhile article and withdrew the nomination. Since there isn't all that much to write about (it wasn't a single or anything), it shouldn't be too hard to get it to GA. Still I think the music info needs expanding. — Realist² 16:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No sorry. If it were a Beatles song, then I could...but I can't find any. :-( Maybe you could slip by without it. Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 14:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will try, I managed to add a little. — Realist² 18:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer reviews

Hey, I'm Hunter. I just put my article for Sebastian Shaw, the stage actor best known for Return of the Jedi, up for a peer review with an eye on a possible featured article status down the road. I'm really pretty new to the Wikipedia thing, but the peer review thing said the best way to go about it was to ask others to peer review it and review their stuff in exchange. I'm not sure if Shaw falls into your area of interest, but I'm a big Beatles fan and would love to review your Strawberry Fields Forever article, if you'd perhaps like to give my Shaw one a whirl?

Also, if you ever need help in future Beatles articles, I'd love to help. Thanks, and let me know what you think of the review stuff!

-- Hunter Kahn (talk) 22:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response, but I did say I was on vacation. Anywho, I'll be glad to do a peer review for the article. The best way to get is to give, so thanks! Let me get all my unresponded postings in order, and I'll be glad to PR it at the available time! Cheers, and good luck! Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 19:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a Peer Review. Thanks for your offer to review Strawberry Fields Forever; I really appreciate it. For your article, I would recommend fixing the suggestions, maybe getting a few more comments from other editors, then maybe putting it up for Good Article status. If you pass that, then you'll have a better chance to get to Featured article status instead of going straight to it. And if it does pass Good Article, then put another Peer Review. Don't go to Featured Article Review until you're ABSOLUTELY SURE that your article is tip-top. Because trust me, Featured Article Review is pure hell, with a capital H. Cheers! Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 14:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Song

Hallo, I am from the german Wikipedia from the sociologic section, and I found out that you wrote a song text on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Song . We want to know the reason(s) why you wrote this song. It would be kind of you to leave an english (or german) comment on http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedistik/Soziologie/Musik&action=edit&redlink=1 . Thank you --84.166.123.219 (talk) 07:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no reason. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 19:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the The

Yes folks, it’s the The time again. You might like to add your opinion (whatever it may be) on this page.--andreasegde (talk) 14:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did too. — Realist² 15:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL I'm back! Well, it's clear that The Beatles rock! Cheers, folks! Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 19:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A different straw poll on Talk:The Beatles

It would be easy to overlook because there are now two polls going at the same time. The newest one is here. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 23:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CE question on SFF

I'm not a topic expert, but there appears to be a discrepancy in two different articles, and the sources cited for both are offline, so I can't check them.

From Strawberry Field: One of Lennon's childhood treats was the garden party that took place each summer in the grounds of Strawberry Field. Lennon's Aunt Mimi recalled: "As soon as we could hear The Salvation Army band starting, John would jump up and down shouting, 'Mimi, come on. We're going to be late

From Strawberry Fields Forever: One of Lennon's childhood treats was the fête held each summer in Calderstones Park every year, where a Salvation Army band played. Lennon's aunt Mimi Smith recalled: "As soon as we could hear the Salvation Army band starting, Lennon would jump up and down shouting, 'Mimi, come on. We're going to be late.'

So which is it, or is it both? Was the "garden party/fete" in Calderstones Park or on Strawberry Field grounds? Is one of them inside the other? Help this poor colonist out. :-) Keeper ǀ 76 17:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm from the good 'ole US of A too, you know! And as such, I wouldn't know off the top of my head. However, a quick Google Maps search shows that Calderstones Park and Strawberry Field are parallel to each other, with Strawberry Field right next to it. (See the result from Google Maps. Straight to the left of the red pointer is a green area, marked "Calderstones Park".) I'll add something that says that Calderstones Park is right next to the Salvation Home. Cheers, buddy, and thanks for your help. Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 22:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about a better question - why does she call John Lennon "Lennon" in the second quote? :D And I'll watch to see a possible response. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 22:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe she wasn't very affectionate? ;-) Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 01:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the best possible answer. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have access to the source(s) that the quote comes from, but I think I made a safe assumption that Lennon's aunt didn't refer to Lennon by his last name. She either said "he", or perhaps "John". I changed it to be [Lennon] in brackets, do with me as you see fit....Keeper ǀ 76 16:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were right, Keeper. The real quote says "John", not "Lennon". Go figure, I changed it to "John" (it's easy enough to establish that it means "Lennon"). I think someone forgot to put brackets around it. Oh well, thanks Ottava Rima for bringing it up. :-) Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 18:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]