User talk:Kajerm
health issues..
[edit]Hahaha.. No problem! I'm quite sneaky like that with my ninja editing skills. Really, I should be thanking you for helping me improve the Health issues and the effects of cannabis article. If you haven't already, you might want to glance over at the article's talk page as well. Take care! --Howrealisreal 22:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
AID
[edit]
Fly
[edit]Hi,
I created the entry for Fly (exercise) and thought you might be interested in looking it over, based on your past contributions. I'm not even sure it makes sense.
WLU 15:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Pooned Biswas?
[edit]Biswas p00nd me like a n00b the other day. how do i get back at him?Bakerstmd 06:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
On July 21, you asked why I changed NPH -> Himself. I didn't know that he wanted to be requested as that. Thanks for informing me. It makes sense that he wanted to be credited as Neil Patrick Harris, instead of Himself, since he doesn't act like that normally. --theblueflamingoSquawk 08:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Neil Patrick Harris is gay
[edit]Why the hell were you editing a NPH article? Why can't you edit useful stuff like lid lag? - Neilymon 22:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Paleolithic style diet
[edit]Hi Kajerm, thanks for offering to help out with the article. I finally purchased the letter to the editor you recommended from Science Direct and also the response to that letter. They both provide a great source of information. I'd like to integrate that info into the criticism section, but I'm concerned about copywrite issues. Can I quote text from those letters, or is that in violation of copywrite? I've seen in done in other wikipedia articles, so I not sure. By the way, what do you think of the article, as it stands, is it neutral and well put together? Thanks very much for your help!Phenylalanine 01:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kajerm. User:Historian 1000 has included the article Paleolithic style diet in the category low-carb diet. I disagree with this move (See the discussion page). Your opinion on this matter would be of great interest. Thank you. --Phenylalanine (talk) 20:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Beer category decision
[edit]A discussion has been opened on changes that have been made to the existing Beer category system. The changes reverse the decision made by the Project in April 2006. The changes were based on agreement by only two people, and by a discussion that took place outside the Beer Project. There may be some merit in the changes, and to prevent future conflict it is important that there is some discussion of the matter. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beer#Brewery_cats. SilkTork *YES! 15:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Template:Oh you crazy biswas you
[edit]Template:Oh you crazy biswas you, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Oh you crazy biswas you and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Oh you crazy biswas you during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Angr 23:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Template:User biswas med
[edit]Template:User biswas med, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User biswas med and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User biswas med during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:46, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Kajerm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kajerm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)