User talk:Jondude11

Clock tower pick

Howdy, Jondude. I had left the P in the userbox pretty minimalist because I wanted to replace it with a decent pic of the clock tower, or a graphical representation thereof. As I'm sure the logo is copyrighted, I'm one of those alums that never gets to Potsdam, and I have never had any faith in Matt Keller to do anything right, do you suppose you might be able to snap one? --starX 16:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the question of whether Jondude11 rockst

Jondude11, thou rockst. Omphaloscope » talk 05:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Campus pics

Jondude- Looks like you've been working hard to get permission to use campus pictures. If you contact College Relations, they may be able to provide a good selection from which to choose. The problem with Matt's pics is that they suck. It's not your fault but they're so bad as to be worse than nothing.CrazyAboutCrane 20:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further praise for Jondude11

Hear ye, hear ye... I hereby award this barnstar to **Jondude11** for making a bazillion articles on local airports, train stations, and Yahwehknowswhat else. *We Wikipedians salute your efforts!*

**Omphaloscope** *talk* 04:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Airports

Greetings! I saw you joined WikiProject Airports and have created a handful of articles. This is very much appreciated! However, I noticed that the newly created articles don't have an airport infobox. You can find the template code for the infobox at WP:AIRPORTS/I. I've also listed them under airports requiring an infobox. If you get the chance, it'd be appreciated if you can add them, but if not, I'll make my best effort to get them added in the coming days. Should you have any questions about its usage, feel free to leave a message on my talk page or on that infobox talk page. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 07:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to keep bugging you. I noticed you're using the infobox on your new articles, and I couldn't be happier, not to mention that you're placing the project banner on the talk pages as well. You even added them to the new article subpage! Only one little thing still sticks in the back of my mind... you're not creating redirects. For example:

Southwest Minnesota Regional Airport (IATA: MML, ICAO: KMML)

Disambiguated at MML, redirected at KMML.

Hope that isn't too confusing. Keep up the awesome work! thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 18:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also wanted to thank you for the work on creating airport articles. If you look at Category:United States airport stubs you will see that there is a template for US airports, {{US-airport-stub}} that you can use. Have fun. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jondude, I worked for 2 defunct airlines, more than happy to talk about them if you would like any information. Schase02

WikiProject Aviation proposal

There is currently a proposal to create an Aviation WikiProject, which would serve to clarify how all the aviation related projects relate, and help with interproject editing. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#Proposal_Recap for how the projects hierarchy. Part of the reorganization proposes that WikiProject Defunct Airlines become a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airlines (or perhaps the Aviation Project itself). For an idea of how task forces work, take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history. They have a number of task forces, listed here. As described by them, "task forces are informal groups of editors gathered for collaborative work on a particular topic within the field of military history; all project members are encouraged to participate in any that interest them." The benefit of such a system it that the sub-topics have all the resources of the overall project at their disposal. For instance, the Military history project banner, is placed on every military history page, and the related task forces are listed at the bottom of it. All military history related articles are thereby joined under one roof. I just happened to stumble upon your project, and had until now never realized it existed. By joining forces with another project you will benefit from increased exposure. If you have any ideas or comments, please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 02:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 19:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Eileen Whelley

A tag has been placed on Eileen Whelley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Videmus Omnia 22:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albany Air

I've deleted this article, which you created, because it did not assert notability. Picaroon (t) 00:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Commuter Airlines.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Commuter Airlines.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Potsdam Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Potsdam Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crane Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crane Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Catch Without Arms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Catch Without Arms.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen Deignan

A tag has been placed on Kathleen Deignan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Michael Slone (talk) 14:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Command Airways Article

Please re-visit the article you created for Command Airways and fix the in-text citations which are improperly formatted and participate in the current discussion which recently began on talk page. Thanks! QualityControl3533 (talk) 06:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still involved with Wikipedia?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.186.4.2 (talk) 04:33, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:OC Route 6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OC Route 6.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Appalachian.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Appalachian.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nature's Path

A tag has been placed on Nature's Path requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DGG (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A Partial Print

A tag has been placed on A Partial Print requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Michael Johnson (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

North White Plains in North Castle

Hey Jondude11, I wasn't able to find a source that supported the existence of a hamlet named North White Plains, so I added a fact tag until one can be found. I also hid the bit about the hamlet including part of the city. So far as I've found, hamlets are only parts of towns in New York and not part of villages and cities. I noticed you included an internal wikilink between reference tags, perhaps to indicate a wiki article that supports your fact. However, since Wikipedia requires third party published material as a source to verify, I was hoping you might be able to find one. Regards, --JBC3 (talk) 04:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JBC3 - Thanks for your help on this topic. I found a source verifying the hamlet's existence in the Town of North Castle (via North Castle's website). I have removed the reference of part of the community being located in the City of White Plains. I believe I put that in unfounded. The reason I put that there is because the train station serving the hamlet (see North White Plains (Metro-North station) is actually located in White Plains, not North Castle. I think what happened is North Castle's North White Plains hamlet is merely the section of the town that borders the City of White Plains, and the community seems to extend into the city. However, based on the definition of a hamlet in the State of New York, the hamlet should end at the town line, since hamlets do not exist within a city. I apologize for the confusion. However, the existence of the hamlet itself in North Castle is now cited. Thanks again for your help! -Jondude11 (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jondude11, for finding and adding a source. I looked at the town's website, but appearantly not very carefully! It's entirely possible that part of what was once considered part of the hamlet of North White Plains was annexed by the city of White Plains, or that the train station was named as it was to reference the community it primarily serves. At any rate, thank you for your efforts! --JBC3 (talk) 04:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made a bunch of additions and changes to the communities section since your last contribution. Would you mind giving it a glance? Helps to have a second set of eyes to make sure I didn't overlook something or go overboard editing stuff. Let me know what you think. --JBC3 (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JBC3, thanks for all your work! It looks good. It's a bit more than the usual hamlet/community, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The more the merrier! Great finds, awesome job. -Jondude11 (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 04:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

swissair

your input is invited at talk:Swissair#key_people, and the associated rfc regarding infobox parameters. --emerson7 15:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Appalachian Airlines for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Appalachian Airlines, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appalachian Airlines until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

High Peaks? Where?

Where did you take your File:High Peaks.jpg picture? The Adirondacks, the Catskills, or was it some mountain range outside of New York? ----DanTD (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Atop Mount Arab in the Adirondacks. --Jondude11 (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of JetAmerica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JetAmerica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JetAmerica until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:20, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Boston MFA.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nyack, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York State Route 9W. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quincy Butler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wells Fargo Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Never stop Wiki'ing, Jondude. Omphaloscope talk 02:29, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palisades, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominican College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jondude11. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buck's Rock

Hi there,

Regarding this, I reverted because lists of notable alumni (or residents, faculty, staff, etc.) should be notable in the sense of WP:N and, in nearly all cases, should have their own Wikipedia article already. If this person is notable, you may want to write the article first. We also almost never link to Amazon, since its primary goal is to sell things rather than to provide neutral, accurate information. In my edit summary, I said it was an Amazon ref link (in the sense of an affiliate link), but I was wrong about that -- the "ref" part of the url threw me. Sorry about that. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jondude11. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hudson Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highland, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Hudson Valley.png

The file File:Hudson Valley.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jondude11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eileen Whelley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eileen Whelley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eileen Whelley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Air Pennsylvania

The article Air Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Carrot official (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Air Vermont for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air Vermont is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Vermont until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chetsford (talk) 05:56, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Potsdam Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Potsdam Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maxson Airfield

The article Maxson Airfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Private airport with no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mount Marcy (disambiguation)

The article Mount Marcy (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One other topic; none of the other mountains called Mount Marcy that are commented out have any incoming links, and they don't look particularly notable to me, so they can't be added as a WP:DABRED link. Hatnotes should handle the job fine here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crane Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crane Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Commuter Airlines

The article Commuter Airlines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has lots of information, some of which can not be attributed to a reliable source. This article also may not meet the notability guideline for wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 17:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]