User talk:Jayanthkumar123

Hello, thank you for editing Brahmanandam page. But before undoing the changes about birth place, please do some research and honour the facts told by actor about his birth village.

Hai I think you created Ardhashathabdham movie Wikipedia from where you took data I don’t know but you have to know some information that there are two producer’s for that film you only mentioned one if you can get information you can take from the news papers press release and also I will provide some information other Producer: Radhakrishna.Telu Banner : 24 Frames Celluloid Hope you will update with proper information n knowledge Thankq

Jayanthkumar123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jayanthkumar123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jayanthkumar123! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Rickyurs (talk) 12:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koo App, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vijayawada, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not remove longstanding sourced content without discussion in the article talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Music of Tollywood moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Music of Tollywood, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk shows/games shows under filmography

Hello. Re this edit, please note that filmography is not meant for talk shows and game shows. Actors do not get credit for promoting their films in these shows. Although they may be listed in the article of respective shows. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 14:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hlo bro create wiki pages on Calling Sahasra and Galodu movies AbcdSab.telfc (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical acclaim

Hello there. Re this edit, critical acclaim means that the film received widespread appreciation while it may not necessarily be the case. Calling it critical reception would do or it may be omitted altogether when there is no other sub-heading like box office. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkvilla

Sir I suggest you do not use Pinkvilla as a source for box office or any movie related as it is considered unreliable. SP013 (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tamil Nadu Talkies

The article Tamil Nadu Talkies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film production company. Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 00:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Telangana into List of capitals of Andhra Pradesh. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Vakeel Saab, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SP013 (talk) 15:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History of Telugu cinema moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, History of Telugu cinema, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SIIMA Award for Best Debut Director (Telugu) has been accepted

SIIMA Award for Best Debut Director (Telugu), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 17:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anjaneya Jewellery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anjaneya Jewellery, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 20:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Surekha Vani

The article Surekha Vani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Been deleted 2 weeks before for the same reasons, only supporting roles, fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Surekha Vani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surekha Vani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surekha Vani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Telugu film actors moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Telugu film actors, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 07:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello Jayanthkumar123. Thank you for your contributions. Re this edit, however, please note that "received positive reviews from critics" should directly be supported by the source; using individual reviews to indicate as such is not allowed per WP:SYNTH. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rajahmundry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Twitter is a self published source and citing it for "Cultural Capital of AP" doesn't hold. Anyone can tweet themselves as such. Also, please do not remove the Original research notice without explanation. -- DaxServer (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voice dub

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. Re this edit, I don't why this is particularly relevant. Also if we are mentioning it for Atharva, there's no reason why dubbing artists of Pooja Hegde and Mirnalini Ravi should be excluded, and basically for every other actress and villain in Telugu films. Therefore, I think we are better off omitting it entirely in the cast. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo has been nominated for renaming

Category:Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Vijayawada Airport. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. There are no scheduled international flights out of anywhere in India, so kindly stop adding DXB to the list. — LeoFrank ^Talk 13:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samajavaragamana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Lists of Indian actors. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intiki Deepam Illalu (July 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Clearfrienda was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not notable enough, there have not been any improvements since last submission.

Clear friend a ^💬 12:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarvottama Granthalayam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sarvottama Granthalayam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MasterChef India (Telugu TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Behind the Scenes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shanmukha Priya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shanmukha Priya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DJRSD (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalyaan Dhev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalyaan Dhev, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalyaan Dhev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maha Samudram have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. BOVINEBOY2008 12:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yuvarathnaa. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fremith Let's talk do it! 04:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at RRR (soundtrack), you may be blocked from editing. Please do not move the page without starting a discussion on the talk page and getting editors to agree on the move. Along with that please check previous talk page discussions about the title of the film. We follow the same template for soundtracks across films on Wikipedia so try to keep it the same. In addition, I have seen that you do not reply to your talk page and you keep doing disruptive edits. Please refrain from doing so. SP013 (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jupitus Smart. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of longest films in India appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 07:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Education in Vijayawada moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Education in Vijayawada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Telugu 2021 movies release dates in Wikipedia

Please create the release dates of telugu movies in Wikipedia recently movies August and September movies release date create Ahtdjdyehdbsuebd (talk) 05:54, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No plot tags

Hi! When you add tags to pages like the {{No plot}} tag as you did here, you only need to add the month and year in the date parameter. The sorting mechanisms only use the month and adding the date will put it in the wrong category. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 10:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Republic World

Hi. Could you use different sources other than Republic World? There is a consensus that it is not very reliable. — DaxServer (talk to me) 13:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The South Indian Cinema Barnstar
		For expanding content related to Telugu cinema and television. Ab207 (talk) 14:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Payal Radhakrishna Article

Hello Sir i have done the article of actress payal radhakrishna [[1]] Can u please help the article to improve I saw Tharagathi Gadhi Daati Page and approaching you 70mmreels (talk) 18:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:History of Telugu cinema

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of Telugu cinema, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:History of Telugu cinema

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of Telugu cinema".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gopi Sundar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asianet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Music of Tollywood

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Music of Tollywood, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive citations

Please refrain from adding excessive citations artificially inflating the importance of the content. I've observed a lot, quite regularly, from your contributions, that this is rather "normal" in your edits. Please read about Wikipedia:Citation overkill. — DaxServer (talk) 09:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello Jayanthkumar123. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jayanthkumar123. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jayanthkumar123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. If you are being paid to edit Wikipedia, you will need to disclose it. If not, please ignore. — DaxServer (talk) 09:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Daxserver, I don't know what made you to do so, but let me clear one thing - I am not paid. Also, I don't have much knowledge about the policies and regualtions of Wikipedia. But I have never done anything against the organization. I understand that I have added excess citations. Since my first day of joining wikipedia, I have always worked to improve the articles that are related to the Indian states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, and Yanam. After going through the article Spamdexing, I got to know about how people spam the things. I wish you understand my intention your comment. — Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 10:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. Happy editing..! — DaxServer (talk) 11:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Telugu film actors

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Telugu film actors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anubhavinchu Raja moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anubhavinchu Raja, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:56, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sarvottama Granthalayam

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarvottama Granthalayam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intiki Deepam Illalu has been accepted

Intiki Deepam Illalu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noobie anonymous (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Education in Vijayawada

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Education in Vijayawada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 Roses (web series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 3 Roses (web series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Telugu Cinema into Cinema of India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. This is your second warning for this - please provide attribution if you do this in the future, or you may be blocked without further warning. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 12:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! hemantha (brief) 10:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rowdy Boys

Hello, Jayanthkumar123,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Rowdy Boys, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 11:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Over the past few months, I've noticed your edits and the citations that you add do not verify. I've been making corrections here and there, but no more. An example: Edit on Bangarraju - Special:Diff/1066046571#Future. The two sources that you've added does say Nagarjuna confirmed the sequel, rather a possibility of it. I'm thankful for your valuable contributions to Wikipedia. But one more edit like this and I will report for sanctions on you. — DaxServer (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Organised crime in India

I witnessed u did editing on this page, and ur interested in it. I want to discuss & suggest a edit with u abt that page. In the media portrait section some 1 wrongly written that , Don (1978-2012) series. But the truth is 1st Don (1978) was a standalone film. Later Don film was a reboot it not made by original makers, so how can it be a series. I want u to write Don (1978) seperate & other seperate.Success think (talk) 09:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Success, I agree that the original Hindi film Don (1978) was later made as Don (2006). Also another Hindi film Don 2 was made as a sequel to the 2006 film. The article it is not just about the film series in Hindi, but also regarding various visual media productions in other languages too. And in the article Organised crime in India, the same is written. If you have any issues regarding that the article Don (franchise), you can state in it's talk page.Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Education in Vijayawada

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Education in Vijayawada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhamakalapam

Hey, Jayanthkumar123! Looks like we unknowing created different pages about the same film—Bhamakalapam (film) (by you at 7:30) and Bhama Kalapam (2022 film) (by me at 7:34). So we need to merge one into the other. Since you created the page first, its logical to merge mine into yours. However, given that I'm autopatrolled, the page created by me is already live and need not be reviewed. Therefore, we can reverse merge if you don't mind. However, I have no issues if you want to retain your page nonetheless. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ab207, let's merge Bhama Kalapam (2022 film) into Bhamakalapam (film). The name of the film is Bhamakalapam, and accordingly there is an article already created by me. Also, you have used infobox for televsion instead of the film. --- Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Its a direct-to-video film, so television infobox may be used. Bhamakalapam (film) is ambiguous because it can also refer to Bhama Kalapam (1988 film). So the title should be Bhamakalapam (2022 film) in that case. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm SP013. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Telugu films of 2022, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from using Pinkvilla as a source SP013 (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit

Please add kgf 2 for the box office collection list 223.224.28.13 (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beast

I found a source saying Beast collected ₹240 crore worldwide.^[1] But when I add it in List of highest-grossing Tamil films, List of highest-grossing South Indian films, you removed my edits. I think Zee Hindustan is reliable. Ranjith207 (talk) 6:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Ranjith, I found that your edits are unconstructive. Before adding the data of the film in other artciles, please go through the respective article's data. Here in the case of Beast (2022 Indian film), the box office data is disputed and also the box office figures are not added in the film's infobox. Similarly you have made changes List of highest-grossing Tamil films and List of highest-grossing South Indian films regarding Valimai and other films. If you wish to add box office figures of any film, then add the data that was already in the respective film's article. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 7:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Ranjith207 (talk) 7:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

I think the source is reliable. If you think so please add it in the film's article. Ranjith207 (talk) 7:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to List of Tamil films of 2022, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.Adakiko, what I did are purely based on the sources. In the case of Valimai, the box office collections are ranged between ₹155.45–234 crore. While few editors are continously chaning its figures as only ₹234 crore which is incorrect. The figures should not vary between List of Tamil films of 2022 and the Valimai articles. Also, its a gentle remainder to u to use the figures that are sourced and are used in the film's main article. Do not make unconsturctive edits. Now in the case of Beast (2022 Indian film), there are no proper box office figures in it's main article. First, let the box office dispute regarding the film, come to an end. Until and unless there are proper figures in the film's article, do not make changes in the articles. ..... Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 5:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Acharya

Your [[2]] on Acharya (2022 film) about the film incurring a loss of र90 crore is supported by Koimoi and Bollywood Life which are unreliable sources. See WP:ICTFSOURCES and the discussions on those unreliable sources. Thank you. We are the Great (talk) 21:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List Of Tamil Films 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Tamil Films 2022 "Valimai without citing a (PINKVALLA) reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I've opened a Talk entry on the Article Talk page and pinged you over here. Thanks 106.198.111.17 (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oo Antava Oo Oo Antava for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oo Antava Oo Oo Antava, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oo Antava Oo Oo Antava until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biased editing

Am observing that your editing is biased and selective, what made you to change Kgf2 collection to change, and what made u to change rrr collection from ₹1150-1200 cr with unauthenticated source. Am waiting for ur reply. Tigerikkada (talk) 14:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tiger, the changes/edits that are done by me are purely reliable. For example, take the case of K.G.F: Chapter 2, I added the lowest range of the collections too. Wikipedia is not for unconstructive edits. I have made edit based on the data provided in the News 18 article, which is regarded as reliable. For your better understanding please go through the article. The collections that are reported by News 18 had a complete breakdown with repective to both area-wise and language wise, thus making the collections more valid. If you are facing any problem while reading the article (as it is in Telugu language), I can help you out. The another edit you talked about is regarding the RRR collections. For your information, I have not made any changes regarding the collections. Please go through article's talk page and history to know more about the changes. I don't know what made you to allegedly make such a brainless statement against me. Hope you get what I mean...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sakshi

Do you think Sakshi is reliable source? U r keep removing authenticated source and citing unreliable sources. Tigerikkada (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously!!!!! I don't even understand how to reply to this brainless statement. First of all, I have not done changes regarding the collections of Beast in the recent times. Yes I do agree that I have made edit on the article, but that was long ago. Secondly, where did you find this Sakshi reference in the article. As far as I know there is no refernce from Sakshi regarding the collections.....Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your biased ending may lead to block your id at anytime, you cited closing collection of Kgf2 with the help of garbage article "news18". But you forgot to cite same article with closing collection of rrr film ₹1150 crore^[2]. Stop your selection editing of wikipedia. Go with authenticated source instead of unreliable. Tigerikkada (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tigerikkada please learn to speak properly with other editors. As as I said earlier I have nothing to do with RRR edits. I have not made any edits regarding the article. But the edits on KGF chapter 2 are purely reliable. If you wish to speak more on this, then you can participate in the ongoing discussion on the article's talk page.Calling a reliable source as a "garbage" shows your awareness about the Wikipedia's policy. I agree that the other refernces on the article are also reliable, but have basic idea about why I have made changes. Finally, I suggest you have some basic idea of what's going on the article. I advice you to change your nature of speaking.......Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) Tigerikkada (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) Tigerikkada (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9 Hours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravi Varma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of highest-grossing Tamil films, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 04:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of highest-grossing Tamil films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop vandalizing pages with your multiple IPs and your account. Panda619 (talk) 14:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Panda619 please refrain from making unconstructive edits. The box office collections of Valimai are ₹155.45–234 crore in it's main article. Please seek consensus at the article's talk page. On every edit I made, I clearly mentioned the reason. Other users including Ab207 also clearly mentioned the reason before making the edits. See here--- [[3]]......Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kinnerasani (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Modern Love Mumbai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Carney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sourced content ?

i did not remove any sourced content that was added previously. Why did you remove all the sourced content added by me ? No perception was changed. You are free to add anything, but you are not free to delete other editors contibutions. Change only which sourced content you haad difference with, you are not entitled for blanket reverts of other editor's contribution. This article is not about dubbed films, and baahubali it is about pan indian films from other regions. The dubbed films information which you added is repetitive, and unstructured with lot of cohesion, grammar issues. I will retain your points in a seperate section of dubbed films within this article. Fostera12 (talk) 13:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

created new section

I have created new section, for your contributions. And lead section i have covered the points that you have already covered. You can feel free to add your contributions, pls dont succumb to blanket reverts of other editors contributions. If you disagree on a certain point change only that aspect in the article. Dont just revert. If i missed out any references, you add those specific links. Fostera12 (talk) 13:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fostera, although the media consider a film to be pan-indian, everything cannot be added here in the list. Please refer to the talk page for the criteria. Mani Ratnam, Ram Gopal Varma, Jeethu Joseph and Kamal Haasan cannot be considered as major figures, because they are really not part of original pan-india made films. I am repeating again that the media may publish saying 'x' is pan-indian figure, but there is certain criteria for this. On the top of the article you have removed "term related to Indian cinema that started off with the Telugu cinema.[1] The term gained popularity since 2015, post the success of Baahubali: The Beginning (2015)." which is very crucial. According to the sources you have added, My Dear Kuttichathan was released only in Tamil and Hindi along with Malayalam. See, the point is the source no where mentioned it as a pan-indian success although it might be successful in Malayalam. Donot add box office puffery here. Mughal-e-Azam and Sholay might be successful but how are they releated to this article. Content related to Drushyam can added but must be relatble to the article, but you have added it's success rather adding its notability. Roja and others might also be successful, but the sources must be related the article. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 13:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am here again reminding you that a pan-indian film must be released in atleast four or more (mostly five) languages [Telugu, Tamil, Kannada, Hindi and Malayalam]. Pan-indian success is different from pan-indian film. The films that are in the list are made to be pan-indian right from their production stage or released THEATRICALLY in the above mentioned languages.

If you disagree with box office u remove only that line. I have added them in background information. Not udner notable films since 2015. Looks like you are immature in wikipedia. Why are you involved in disruptive editing, when im clealry saying to change only points you disagree. I did not add any puffery.

I have not at all said about the box-office performances of the films after 2015. I have clearly said about the films mentioned in the background section..Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kannada film

pushpak is a pan indian kannada film, you can add that information in background section Fostera12 (talk) 13:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

updates

Kindly update without deleting the information added by me Fostera12 (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubbed films

I have added the dubbed films information in seperate section. Update in that section Fostera12 (talk) 14:01, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

using capital letter

using capital letters in edit summaries is shouting on other editor, and disrespecting fellow editor which is against wikipedia policy. Fostera12 (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that is clearly not my intention, you are the one who have added irrelevant information on the article. Such as adding yet to be released films on the list, non-major figures, etc. If you wish add something that is in large size, then use the article's talk page, which would be easier. Th bulk content you added cause disruption....

Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Pan-Indian films

Just wanted to let you know that I stand by you in your opinion on pan-Indian films as shown here (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan-Indian film). DareshMohan (talk) 21:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your recent editing history at Pan-Indian film shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Tamil films of 2018, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove or add or change sourced content, to how you think it should be. You have also blanked the content from the section Awards without providing any explanation which as a result all of your edits in the page have been reverted. Please use the edit summary if you want to add or change content. Theoder2055 (talk) 07:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theoder2055, the point is I have corrected the figures of 2.0, added Sarkar with reliable sources, etc..I haven't made any disruptive edits. Adding awards section is fine, but adding the award categories is not intended in this case. Also, the film is not about the dubbed films, in that case there will be many films....In the mean I will clean up every film article where dubbed film section is added. It is not really needed to be added.it's not just for the mentioned page. You might also be clearly aware of this. Even in the recent pages, we didn't add dubbed films section in any article. You can remove that section in the various articles and clean it up. I am getting this straight again, you can add awards/events but not the categories.. if you wish then you can open a discussion on that so that we can get insights from the other users too....Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Jayanthkumar123 at least thanks for the response. Also I suggest that to always use the edit summary so that you can explain your changes. Happy editing! Theoder2055 (talk) 06:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what is the problem

Moved to Talk:RRR (film)

– Moved content dispute to article talk page.Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your work

I standby what you said on RRR title. Thank you for editing in good faith. DareshMohan (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your inputs...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 4:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep Doing for Tamil Cinema Monhiroe (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmastra review summary

What you said is "if the ratings are from 1 to 4 out of 5 stars then we must mention the overall reviews as mixed". But in the case of brahmastra the positive reviews over dominate the negative reviews so overall critic summary can be considered as positive. Khiladi King (talk) 16:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is why I haven't removed the "positive" credit. Please understand my comment, even if the positive reviews dominate, there are two extremes in this case i.e., 1 and 4. We can go with only positive if there isn't such a low extreme. There isn't just one review giving a one-star rating. Otherwise, let's wait and watch for other upcoming reviews and let the current edit remain. Thank you...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brahmāstra: Part One – Shiva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Telugu cinema fan

request you please Stop promoting Telugu cinema as largest film industry wherever you find space. This has been a major issue with your edits. Lifting of some crazy reference out of context and citing it, the article is about cinema of india not cinema of hyderabad. There is no such thing as largest film industry of India. Please keep your edits within context.Fostera12 (talk) 11:38, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.). Fostera12 (talk) 11:55, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.) Fostera12 (talk) 12:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.) Fostera12 (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fostera12 (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing archiving and DS aware notices from my talk page

I am lost at your edit [4] on my talk page removing my configuration for archiving, DS aware templates. Could you explain yourself? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:22, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I might did it by mistake, I am actually unaware of that Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 12:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, no worries ;) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

DareshMohan has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Just wanted to say thank you for voicing your honest opinions. Really means a lot.^†

DareshMohan (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you are doing well. Thanks for all your messages. Stay strong! DareshMohan (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

raghupathi venkaiah naidu

Naidu is not his birth name, it is added as caste prejudice in some communities. But I am not going to change it. Thanks Fostera12 (talk) 13:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do aware of these caste related-things. But his complete given name is Raghupathi Venkaiah Naidu. Even the article is named after this (including Naidu). That is why I said not to remove the entire name. If the article or his complete name doesn't include "Naidu" then I would not said that. Here it is the matter of name, no matter how is it. In the personal life sections, it is acceptable to remove caste, as it is subjective. But, that case is different from here. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 04:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Induvadana

Hello, Jayanthkumar123,

Thank you for creating Induvadana.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! I've tagged notability, refs 4 and 5 are probably reliable, independent, and constitutes of significant coverage, which means that the article IMO is borderline notable. However, is 123 Telugu reliable? Unfortunately, I couldn't find any editorial policies. Many thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 06:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it a reliable source. We use it for many Telugu/Tollywood film articles. It is primarily used only for reviews and not much for other film-related content. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dude why you changed ponniyin selvan box office to 450..?? it is almost close to 500 but why bringing down..??

in your article from firstpost it says

While Ponniyin Selvan grossed over Rs 450 crore at the global box office, it says grossed over that means not excactly 450 you idiot... நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 23:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before making comments mind your words and decency. I know that "grossed over 450 crore" means not exactly 450. But, at that point of time, there is no other source which mentions exact figure. Making personal attacks by using words such as "idiot" is not acceptable. Know how to behave with other users. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/variety/ponniyin-selvan-i-set-to-cross-500-crore-in-box-office-collection/article66053470.ece

so you guys dont trust hindu news too....go take a look at the latest..and please change..don't try to put false data and people gonna think it did not do in box office..the info i sent is the latest october 25th now its nove 2 it should have crossed 500 crore long time ago brother.sorry for using bad words but please change. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/ponniyin-selvan-box-office-collection-historical-epic-collects-rs-464-09-crore-worldwide/articleshow/95013766.cms

october 21st it got 464..based on economic times so now it is november 2n it should hbe highesr than 450 crore that you try to put in this list..pls change pls change நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Ponniyin Selvan 1' box office collection: The epic historical film hits Rs.500 crores

By -

ETimes.in

Created: Nov 2, 2022, 11:50 IST

november 2 timesofindia article says ponniyin selvan reached 500 crore pls check them and that is reliable source and change it to 500 crore please..

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/box-office/ponniyin-selvan-1-box-office-collection-the-epic-historical-film-hits-rs-500-crores/articleshow/95247398.cms நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

times of india news article is reliable so pls change it to 500 crore as it was published nov 2nd which is today.. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it says in that article The epic historical film hits Rs.500 crores hits 500 crore so that means it reached 500 crores. you definitely have to change it now..so please change don't hang around in that 450 - 480 false long time data. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is not need to rush for box office collections. If the source are reliable then the figures can be changed. Don't bring TOI source here (at least for this case). In the 2st November article it mentioned 500 crore (as you said). But in the article [https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/enthiran-jeans-ps-1-aishwarya-rai-bachchans-tamil-blockbusters-that-shattered-bo-records/articleshow/95202901.cms] published just a day before (1st November), it mentioned 400 crore gross. So how can this both articles reliable. Yes, TOI is reliable, but there are many cases where it did in a such way. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

mr jayanthkumar in the economictimes article that you are referring it says [ went on to gross over Rs 400 crore at the box office] it says gross over but the november 2nd says clearly it reached 500 we can trust the word reached but not the previous [over 400] over means not 400..so pls add the source that is from november 2nd it is 100 percent trustworthy. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 12:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

8th Sakshi Excellence Awards moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 8th Sakshi Excellence Awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on various movie related articles

Hi dear @Jayanthkumar123, while your edits are appreciated but with reference to your recent article edit from ps1 from a biased standpoint and with reference to article with outdated content and repeated references to the same non-sensical articles, while it might be a sign of misguidance and iterating it without research makes it suspicious of vandalism You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.

Appreciate you to use talk, clarify and then edit well researched and standing articles. Rocketks (talk) 18:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If my edits are unreliable then I am ready to get blocked Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder i had really made vandalism on various movie related articles. First, don't make suck fake allegations against other users. The context is long-standing so you are the who one who should resolve the issue at the talk page

Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 18:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was a week before where firstpost article claiming 450crore was not reliable was politely conveyed, isn't it?? Rocketks (talk) 18:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't much time difference between the sources. So, the Firtpost article can be considered. There is no hurry for box office figures. As the days pass, we can get much more sources if possible. The same happened with Vikram film too. At first everyone claimed that it collected 500 crore. But, today you can check it's figures, there is a vast difference. So no need to hurry. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Being a wikieditor its our responsibility to report accurate figures to the masses, being an Indian and of our rich heritage and culture it's our pride that these movies are reaching worldwide, so I can refer to box office collection as of day 20 and claim it to be of day 38?? Anyways "no hurry" right?? believe audience world wide are also of "no hurry".

I would appreciate and you can please make your claim of 450 crore by providing valid citations from reliable sources as of today. Rocketks (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Why don't you just understand. It took nearly almost one month to get proper figures for Radhe Shyam. If possible I can generate source. Note that I am not claiming anything. As the time differences between the sources is less, firtspost is also reliable. Yes, it's our responsibility to report accurate figures, for that we cannot just remove other reliable figures. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rocketks please do not call edits like this vandalism. Wikipedia has a pretty specific definition of vandalism you can read at WP:VANDAL, and especially the section WP:NOTVAND. Good faith edits are NOT vandalism. This is a content dispute, nothing more. Both of you need to take this to the article talk page and stop the edit war. Ravensfire (talk) 19:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire, updating and keeping wiki is everyone's interest but what if you keep repeating the same unsensible articles published and make that as a source for citations, it has been more than a week requesting @Jayanthkumar123, to please provide citations for making the claim per wiki guidelines, we need to provide citations from research and from a neutral stand of interest. Rocketks (talk) 01:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actively seek consensus on the article talk page. If needed, leave a message on their talk page directing them there, noting WP:BRD. Ask for comments from other editors at WP:ICTF. If the back and forth continues, asking for full protection on the article at WP:RFPP or .going to edit-war notice board can be options. There's a really good resource at WP:DR on dispute resolution. But it is not vandalism. Disruptive editing? Possible. Just not vandalism - they are making what they believe good faith edits to improve the article. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you are the one using the article talk page to discuss changes, it earns some goodwill. Hint to Jayanthkumar123 as well... Ravensfire (talk) 13:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The firstpost that you are mentioning is actually referring to the box office figures published on Oct 19 by the production house while the article itself was published more than week later, it's something like today I will write an article based on reference from a month old, is it a valid source in case of reporting box office figures??

I'm not against your claim but please provide valid citations as of today claiming it to be 450crore is my request. Rocketks (talk) 01:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide citation claiming it to be 450crore for PS1

Hi @Jayanthkumar123, it's been repeating and I'm not sure what's the intent?? kindly go through what I have stated above

"The firstpost that you are mentioning is actually referring to the box office figures published on Oct 19 by the production house while the article itself was published more than week later, it's something like today I will write an article based on reference from a month old, is it a valid source in case of reporting box office figures??

Concern is article is new but look at the reference, it's old right?? so it's not an up to date article.

I'm not against your claim but please provide valid citations as of today claiming it to be 450crore is my request"

If you find any citations for the claim please edit as per your view else please don't revert. Thanks Rocketks (talk) 03:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

mr jayanthkumar did not even changing ps1.and the film should be in 15th from the list..he is deliberately bringing the film down to 18th ..i have asked him many times but he is still sticking with firstpost article based on oct 19th something pls rocketks kindly change the film to 15th from the list..if you can..please.. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 14:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

mr jayanthkumar ponniyinselvan1 reached 495 - 500 crores why it is still placed in no 18th place please kindly change it to no 15th atleast by now.. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sakshi Excellence Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sakshi Excellence Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakshi Excellence Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— hako9 (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahesh Babu

My dear friend pls provide source on his birth name, and then revert Fostera12 (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at the talk page. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pawan Kalyan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss at talk page Jayanthkumar, don't revert edits rapidly. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birth name Babu

This issue is plain mirroring of wikipedia, and Babu is not part of birth names in Mahesh Babu, and Pawan Kalyan, and this is a fact. There is no involvement from other editors doesn't make your point agreeable. There is no source for their birth names. This is a fact. The source is wrong. Fostera12 (talk) 17:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Kindly revert the Disruptive Editing (Major Changes) as you just did at the List of highest-grossing Punjabi films. You could have asked in the discussion panel to add sources where there is any lack but you have even removed well-sourced content.

It's a suggestion as I am facing a ban myself for a major change that I did by mistake. So, kindly revert to prevent yourself from any sort of ban.

Splitting articles

Hi Jayanth. Please read Wikipedia:Splitting#How to properly split an article. You are not attributing in the edit summary. Please do that from next time — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia and attribution

Hi. In the above sections, I see at least 3 users (including me) telling you that when copying within Wikipedia, you must provide attribution in the edit summary. Yet you haven't done so Special:Diff/1134919149. This only goes so far. Please attribute next time you copy, or else I might have to drag you to WP:ANI. Read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamlesh Patel (Daaji), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Annie ( Telugu actress)

A tag has been placed on Annie ( Telugu actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Christian75 (talk) 10:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kavitha Marupudi

This user is very disruptive and stubborn. Please keep an eye on all their edits. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for intimating about the user. Will look into their edits. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prasanth Varma Cinematic Universe

Please Help me in Developing Article - Draft:Prasanth Varma Cinematic Universe Abhinavtej (talk) 19:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I'm gonna assume that her mother is Telugu [5]. DareshMohan (talk) 00:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Considering her mother, it is definitely Telugu. But in the same list there are other people (for example, Sridevi) whose mother tongue is also Telugu. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sixth Sense Kannada

The article Sixth Sense Kannada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2021

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sreeleela

Hi @Jayanthkumar123, I recently reverted an edit you made on the Sreeleela page (see [6]), and here [7], you went ahead and restored most of it, without offering an explanation, and in breach of WP:BRD and WP:Edit warring protocol. If you have a strong reason for making the edits you wish to impose on the page, please do not do so without attempting to communicate with other editors, especially after you've been reverted. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2018 (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have clearly mentioned the reason for my edits. Yes I am aware of the three-revert rule, but don't be partial while reporting the notice. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 04:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, you may be blocked from editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am just removing the unnecessary content. Why don't you understand that 200 crore figure of 2018 is just a business figure and 177 crore is the reliable figure. Also, for the Pulimurugan, only 152 crore figure is added, but in the very original film page, the box figure has a range between 134.85-152 crore. Can you answer about the above two situations. I understand that, you being from Kerala wants to keep the article neat and well maintained as you are the person who is directly associated with the regional dynamics, but also understand that it is important to add the content in a neutral point of view. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 13:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my ethnicity has nothing to do with the edits I make. I hardly ever lived in Kerala and my interests are only because of the movies. The Malayalam articles I edit form only a fraction of my edits and there isn't any conflict of interest so far. The addition of box office figures have undergone so much of scrutiny before (as seen in the talk pages of the list) and the reliability of references are clearly established per WP:ICTFSOURCES. So if you are interested in improving the article, kindly refer to that list of references given and use them to update the articles. Double check before adding or removing the references, and make sure you give a proper rationale in the edit summary when you removing or adding, especially for major edits with over 1000 bytes. It's absolutely necessary and some you gave are not self explanatory.
As with the argument of exact box office figures, I know it's a hard thing to keep track Indian BO. The list has undergone very deep scrutiny to differentiate publicity figures and independent tracker websites to denote the exact figures, and have finally came to that form you are seeing now. Kindly go through the edit history for the exact timeline.
@Arjunsoumithran: have explained the dynamics of the collection and the references in the next section of your talk page. So you both discuss and figure it out, without edit warring. Both of you are given a 3RR violation warning before and the next one might be a direct ban from an admin without a warning. As a fellow editor, it will be a bit sad for me to lose both of you since you both have a common love for cinema and Wikipedia, something to come by hard. So please figure it out and then come to an agreement.
Alternatively, either of you can start a RfC or a discussion on the Cinema Task force talkpage for obtaining an exact consensus and a guideline for future addition of BO figures to Mollywood films. It will be really helpful and hence all the discrepancies and edit warring can be solved easily. Just ping me if such a discussion ever happens, and I'll join too.
For Wikipedia and Cinema. Thanks and happy ediitng :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unverified, own prespective edits

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Malayalam_films&diff=prev&oldid=1187104968 this particular edit, can you explain what made you to change the figures ? You are the only one who differentiated between gross and business in the 2018 (film edit history I appreciate and understand that, which seems believable. But what about the rest of the films with all the references you added, clearly stating satellite, digital sales, business from the makers. So I request that you please take your time to read what is written in the source and then verify before making such a vast edit. Don't just make your own calculations, but seek consensus on the talk page. Also, I would appreciate you read the talk page of the particular page before editing further. Arjunsoumithran (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not making my own calculations. I am just mentioning the correct figure. Can you cite an example to support your statement, "film edit history I appreciate and understand that, which seems believable. But what about the rest of the films with all the references you added, clearly stating satellite, digital sales, business from the makers", so that I can your understand where did I make a mistake. Because as far as I know, I don't add business figures, I only add gross figures. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay jayanth! It's so hard to maintain the bo figure for South films, especially Malayalam! It will also be good if you can maintain its reliability as accurately as possible! Check the references you added https://www.asianetnews.com/entertainment/box-office/actor-mammootty-movie-bheeshma-parvam-cross-100-crore-in-worldwide-r9jhbg

This is a business figure, as per Ramesh Bala tweet and you can clearly read it.

https://www.asianetnews.com/entertainment/box-office/shanes-rdx-crosses-100-crores-worldwide-business-neeraj-madhav-starrer-film-budget-profit-details-hrk-s1hivt

Also, a business figure, which I have removed from the page if you check the history, and its talk page interrupting with another user. But my intentions are to not extend the inaccurate information to that particular page, which I believe is the only one showing the closest accurate data.

https://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/movie-news/2018/11/20/nivin-pauly-rosshan-andrews-kayamkulam-kochunni-box-office-collections-the-film-joins-the-100-crore-club.amp.html also a busines figure

https://www.news18.com/movies/mammootty-starrer-kannur-squad-crosses-rs-100-crore-mark-worldwide-8648316.html business figure !

I still don't understand why you are updating without even reading what is written! You have reverted the edits citing as "unreliable sources constructive edits" how are they unreliable to you? Is it you are making this yourself!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_Telugu_films You missed the important part from the the above article stating that the collection is not based on a single source but on many sources! You are using only one source, PINKVILLA, in all the articles but neglecting many others, which constitute a pov editing, which is certainly a disruption. So I request you to undo the edit you made on the article and seek consensus. Arjunsoumithran (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arjunsoumithran, hope you are doing well. Frankly speaking, India doesn't have proper box office tracking system. As far as I know, Bollywood have by far the better tracking portals (Bollywood Hungama and Box Office India are best examples). Tollywood too fairly better tracking system but is limited to only Andhra-Nizam, Karnataka and United States (including Canada) markets. Similarly Kollywood too have good tracking system limited to Tamil Nadu, Andhra-Nizam and some important Tamil-speaking countries (Sri Lanka, Malaysia and GCC). But, Kannada cinema and Mollywood doesn't have proper tracking system within their territories. Most of the English sources which we rely on for the box office figures doesn't have proper information; mostly for Telugu, Tamil, Kannada and Malayalam films. So they rely mostly on the third party sources from the respective regions. Due this reason, Telugu and Tamil have atleast good amount of sources. I have observed publishing the business figure is a regular practice in Malayalam films. Check these articles from various publishers (The Indian Express: https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/tovino-thomas-starrer-2018-becomes-first-malayalam-film-to-reach-rs-200-crore-milestone-8652435/), (Telangana Today: https://telanganatoday.com/2018-becomes-first-malayalam-film-to-gross-200-crores-worldwide). In both of these articles, the title itself is misleading, not just these many websites mentioned that the film crossed 200 crores, they never mentioned if it is gross or business but the poster that was officially released clearly mentioned the figure as business. You might be aware how our Indian websites only highlights what they want, here 200 crore figure is a big thing so they did the same, but as a contributor it is important to check whether the figure is correct or wrong. As the days pass, due to no other option the websites repeatedly report 200 crore. This was happend alot in Telugu and Tamil films, but the only better thing is in both these industries, the business figure is rarely or never published officially during the theatrical run. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation. Stop making cut paste moves. Seek an RfC / WP:CONSENSUS for move in the respective talk pages. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give a reason for the above warning. The organization was officially changed and as per that the changes have been made. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 17:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have to go through proper RfC in the talk page for move. These are Wikipedia articles, and hence abide by its policies (WP:COMMONNAME). Besides, cut-paste moves are not allowed. Apart from other things, the history of the article gets changed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcourse, I know that these are Wikipedia articles, but the organization's name got changed ten years ago, but till now the page name has not been changed. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then make a proper move request in the talk pages. Wikipedia articles follow Wikipedia policies, and it is part of the process. They are not bound by the subject of the article. You cannot make changes unilaterally, that too a cut-paste-move. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thankyou for your Contribution on english wikipedia, Really Impressed! ~~ Milli's Boy (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saagaraludhaati

Hi, user:Saagaraludhaati is removing reliable sources and adding unreliable sources to articles Guntur Kaaram, List of Indian films of 2024 and List of Telugu films of 2024. Please do anything. Falimy (talk) 07:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pan-Indian film

I noticed that Ponniyin Selvan and Leo were removed. So does the term mean only films that were dubbed and successful in many languages? Because the films I listed both failed in other languages despite being dubbed. DareshMohan (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't any particular criteria, but going by the article, the film should be released in three/four/more Indian languages (excluding original version). There are many films releasing in several languages, so only those films which are successful in dubbed versions (considerably one/two/more) and gained some prominence in other parts of India (outside of their core market like, Telugu cinema-Andhra Nizam, Tamil cinema-Tamil Nadu, Hindi cinema-North India, etc.). There are sources which show Leo is successful in all the dubbed versions (till some extent) and also gained some prominence in the pop culture (for example, it's score soundtrack, characters, box office), but Ponniyin Selvan was only successful in the Tamil version and Tamil-speaking regions around the world. Here success doesn't necessarily be only box-office, but also it's influence. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 13:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But Hanu-Man was successful in all languages and is one of the highest grossing film on USA. And also gained some prominence in pop culture, as you mentioned. I have provided sources too. Please read it. And tell if anything is missing. Please don't remove simply. 103.166.245.202 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciating your efforts for trying my inputs. No doubt, Hanu-Man is successful in only Telugu and Hindi versions, but there isn't much influence of the film in pop culture and the Indian industry whole (being successful in one region is not essential). For your information, Hanu-Man is one of the highest grossing "Telugu" films in NA, but not "Indian". There are many other films like Leo, PS series and Hindi films which collected more than this film. But even them were not included in the list, because there isn't much impact nation-wide or there aren't any primary sources which support their influence. Adipurush can be in the list, because here only it's not just about box office but also about other criteria. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But Adipurush failed in every languages. 103.166.245.202 (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hanu-Man (soundtrack)

Hello, you removed the cover image that I added to the Hanu-Man (soundtrack) page, I assume it was because it was not the correct cover. If you give me a link to a picture of the correct cover I would be happy to add it to the page. Thank you J04n(talk page) 16:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Films not on internet

Upon going through the Zamin Ryot archives [8], there are a few films that bring absolutely no content on a Google search. I lack context (don't read Telugu) on who the entire cast and crew of the film is. In the future, if I encounter a review for an unknown film, can I post it here and you help me find if other sources exist online? DareshMohan (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 13:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find any other sources on Youth (2001) directed by Jithendra and produced by G.B. Jayadev [9]? DareshMohan (talk) 08:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning

What does Gadi mean in Brahmi Gadi Katha? DareshMohan (talk) 03:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a masculine phrase to call or denote someone. Similar to Garu (which is gender neutral). Gadi is a casual phrase that can be used only for someone (mostly friends) we are close with, not for elders/strangers. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharanya Pradeep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nizamabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Magazine

Which magazine is this from [10]? DareshMohan (talk) 06:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sitara, shown here. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page 2024 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. 456legend talk 09:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bangalore#Requested move 21 March 2024

Hi Jayanthkumar123, I would have been inclined to support this nomination however you really need to provide evidence such as media shifting their usage, statistics etc regarding Bengaluru vs Bangalore. AusLondonder (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what sort of evidence should I show. There are literally thousands of sources on the internet where every news agency uses the word Bengaluru. So, what else should I provide. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Length of article

List of Telugu film actresses is best to cut at five films as a lead since the list could get really long otherwise. See List of Tamil film actresses. Only include Mrunal Thakur if we can confirm she will appear in two more Telugu films. DareshMohan (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is best to cut at three films as a lead. Even in the regular articles, we consider three films for denoting the film industry they are working in. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add another point here, although Mrunal Thakur did only three films, she got recognition from Telugu cinema than from Hindi cinema. They are few actors who are in this league. There are many actors who got recognition as a Telugu actress by doing less than four films. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about a subsection in 2020s called Upcoming actresses where you can source their work and recognition? DareshMohan (talk) 06:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't work, because how can somebody be called as upcoming if they are already established. Let's take Thakur as example, she has being received wide recognition with many calling her as a star actress or Tier-1 actress. It's better to have three films criteria which satisfies every aspect. Anyways, adding three film criteria won't make the article too longer, as already most of them were already added. But we can't deny that actresses such as Thakur can be added to the list. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MasterChef India – Telugu season 2 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to MasterChef India – Telugu season 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jayanthkumar123 reported by User:Gotitbro (Result: ). Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 19:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Achyuth Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need your insight

Hello, I’m new to Wikipedia as a contributor. Saw your contributions in other pages. So I need your insight on this situation. I made an edit recently on Mayabazar page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mayabazar&action=history) and cited reliable sources. The edit was about where the film was produced. I provided necessary information in the source backing it that the film was produced by Telugu cinema and shot as a bilingual. But a senior editor kept deleting the source and the information giving absurd reasons quoting “for sake of neutrality” but how can a fact be omitted for sake of neutrality? If you see his user page, my additions clearly are in conflict with his personal Interests.

I countered him on some points citing sources and now he raised a request on administrators notice board accusing me of a Sock. Your take on this? Swarleystinson88 (talk) 03:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your recent editing history at Aranmanai 4 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have violated 3RR with over a half dozen reverts on just a few hours. This is a blockable offense. If you edit this page today I (or another uninvolved admin) will block you to prevent further disruption. I suggest you meet the other editor in page talk and discuss a solution. BusterD (talk) 11:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning - Repeated Offence

It is noted that you are repeatedly engaged in deletion of the Upcoming list of movies in 2024 Kannada movies. In case of any errors, you can correct the same by providing proper reference, however if it is seen that any edit/ deletion is made without context or proper reference, proper action would be taken. Kebru Maga (talk) 06:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are again repeatedly deleting the upcoming films table, It would be better if you could take your sweet time and check the sources cited which indicate the movies as scheduled for release in 2024. Kebru Maga (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have clearly mentioned the article is only for scheduled/released films. What's the purpose of having a section called "upcoming releases", when they they can be added in the above sections if they truly have a scheduled release date. No other language/country's list of films article follow such section. Universally, this section is not followed in any country. By the way in the source provided for UI,[11] the release date is April 2024. If the film has scheduled release date, then add them in the above sections. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The list of movies in the Upcoming movies list are those which are scheduled to release in 2024 but without any specific dates, As for your comment on other language/country's list, Wikipedia hasn't specified any format for the same.

If you find any specific film which is irrelevant or contains outdated information, it is better you remove the specific film rather than the entire list. Kebru Maga (talk) 06:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The film with only a proper release date should be added in this article. The format is followed everywhere, for more information please refer the 2024 in film and articles for every country present in that article. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since a specific date is not provided, it is classified under Upcoming.

And i dont want to reiterate that there is no specific guideline provided. Further why do you want to refer the Page so quoted, is it some benchmark ? Kebru Maga (talk) 12:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubbed Releases and Upcoming Releases removal in List of Telugu films of 2024

Hello, May I know why you are repeatedly removing the entire sections of Dubbed Releases and Upcoming Releases? I do not see any reason for deletion of this content. As you can see, Dubbed Films section has been added to other release year articles like 2018 and 2019 while Upcoming Releases section is present in other languages other than Telugu. I have noticed you are engaging in deletion of these sections in many different languages and the above warnings show that other editors are against your changes.

In case of any errors, you can correct the same by providing proper reference, however if it is seen that any edit/ deletion is made without context or proper reference, proper action would be taken. Choicearticle07 (talk) 06:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is for the original released/scheduled films in the dedicated language respectively. Not for the dubbed or unscheduled (no release date) films. This criteria is being followed by the articles around the world in every language. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the editors without knowing the criteria might have added those sections in 2018 and 2019, thanks for letting me know. I will clean up them. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, please don't draw any conclusions without having prior understanding of the edit. After reading this, " I have noticed you are engaging in deletion of these sections in many different languages and the above warnings show that other editors are against your changes", I want to let you know, yes I will definitely remove the unconstructive edits. The above one is not even a warning, the official warning is not in that structure. I understand that both you and the above editor are new here, so before doing edits understand the criteria. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry I wasn't aware of the criteria that the article is only dedicated to releases made in the respective film industry. Looking at the past articles, I thought dubbed releases fit the criteria of the article. Will follow this criteria in the future. Choicearticle07 (talk) 07:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A special barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		For creating much needed articles! DareshMohan (talk) 05:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Vestrian24Bio. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of highest-grossing Tamil films without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 15:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Language

If you happen to find the CBFC certificate of the Hindi version of Kalki 2898 AD, it would be helpful because I have a feeling that they did not reshoot any scene in Hindi, so Hindi should be removed from the infobox. DareshMohan (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, we have to wait until the release of the film, or atleast until the Hindi version gets certified. Then, we might find the CBFC certificate of the Hindi version. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 04:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A close analysis on the release trailer shows that even actors who would be comfortable in Hindi (Saswata Chatterjee [12]) spoke in Telugu only. We'll reconvene on the 17th but hopefully someone sees the Hindi version of the film and updates Wikipedia from misinformation. Although updating the article based on seeing that the CBFC is dubbed in theatres may constitute original research @SP013:. What can support the one language claim is that Bujji and Bhairava was made only in Telugu and that his previous film Mahanati was falsely promoted as a bilingual. DareshMohan (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have made a good analysis, but as I said earlier let's wait until the film's release or atleast until Hindi version's CBFC certificate is available. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 04:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upon watching the film, Saswata Chatterjee says a single dialogue in Hindi (for the Telugu version because the film wants to attract pan Indian audience) while when Deepika Padukone is kept inside of the pregnant lab, the other ladies lip is not in sync for Telugu version. Sadly shooting 10 seconds in another language is enough to have a straight certificate as per Saaho's Tamil version. DareshMohan (talk) 23:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rashmika Mandanna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sikandar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your work at Prathinidhi 2. DareshMohan (talk) 06:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kalki box ofice

requesting change of kalki box office to 700 crore as users are changing it without any reason, the box office has passed 700 crore 2409:40F3:101A:4292:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Charliehdb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kalki 2898 AD, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also see WP:FRUIT. Charliehdb (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sources provided are reliable and doesn't quote or mention from makers. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the use of removing Pinkvilla source? Can't you keep it in range. Charliehdb (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not use the other sources, the majority is towards 700 crore. See here mentioned by T2BLive [13], I know it is not reliable, but checkout the collections, it clearly mentioned theatrical business and break-even point with 97% recovery and a gross of 694.20 crore. The source clearly mentions the share and gross, the site specific to Telugu films. The collections in the brackets are gross and the remaining are share. So, try to understand that the film indeed collected way more than 650 crore. I am not saying to include the T2BLive sources, but you can have a reference that it collected nearly 700 crore. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It may tell, but why not following the wikipedia rules. If there is more reliable sources, you should keep it in range. Also Firstpost and Variety sources are directly from makers, but its not mentioned, I can't do anything. Charliehdb (talk) 14:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can you they are directly from makers when they have no where mentioned. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See 'Please provide information on self-publishing' mentioned in film's article next to box office. So FP's source can easily be removed. Then Variety source was published on 4 July, after the makers giving the 700 crore post.[14]. Charliehdb (talk) 14:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why are you removing the content which I have wrote on your talk page [15]. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel maybe you have done a mistake unknowingly, so I have left a message on your talk page. Also, you have clearly mentioned to message on your talk page if you made a mistake, when I do so, you will revert (link is on the above line). Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of highest-grossing Indian films. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any specific reason for the removal of sourced content from List of highest-grossing Indian films?? The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the mentioned Hindustan Times article has numbers from trade analyst Manobala whose tweets are generally regarded as inflated as per the discussion at Indian cinema task force. See here-- [1]. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, sources which reports without relying on such trade analysts are considered more reliable, the same is now applied to Kalki 2898 AD, isn't it? Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You failed to provide an edit summary or any explanation for the removal of a sourced content, that is disruptive editing in Wikipedia. Please provide adequate edit summary every time. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charliehbd

The user charliehbd has been changing the box office collection as per his wish for the past few days from a single source requesting protection of the page from the user. 2409:40F3:101A:4292:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with Kalki B.O under reporting

Hello @Jayanthkumar123. I updated the B.O of but it has been reverted to numbers that of 5th July. I raised the issue about Pinkvilla & BOI under reporting as well. How to go about this? Swarleystinson88 (talk) 06:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)The current figure is 815 crores, as reported by Pinkvilla on 10th July (yesterday). The other issue has been answered in the talk page of the relevant page itself. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (RRR) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 14:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I welcome the block, I don't think there will be a situation of consensus. The user @SaibaK is active since February 2024 but has barely 25 edits on Wikipedia. Only on 14 July 2024 he has added a section named "Reception by international filmmakers" on RRR (see here [16]). Which film article on Wikipedia has section with such names?. Isabelle Belato, I guess you are well versed with such edits from new users. This user (SaibaK) is only active to add information on RRR. His contributions are sole to that page and adding that section that too with bluff name. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the user's talk page was entirely blank, with no warnings given to them. I've warned them now, and if they continue reverting, they will be blocked. Being the more experienced editor, I recommend you bring these matters to the appropriate venue instead of participating in edit wars. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 14:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll request @Jayanthkumar123 to not use ad-hominem attacks and instead state the principles behind his deletion of the section containing well cited and noteworthy information. SaibaK (talk) 14:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have clearly mentioned my reasons for my edits. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution notification

Hi Jayanthkumar123,

Kindly note that a dispute resolution request has been opened here:

Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#RRR

As you already know, we've also discussed this topic in detail in the talk page. Talk:RRR/Archive 2#Inclusion of acclaim by filmmakers for RRR

Notifying you as per the requirement of dispute resolution.

With regards. SaibaK (talk) 06:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jayanthkumar123,

Since you didn't participate in the previous dispute resolution citing your absence (you have mentioned this on the RRR talk page on 30th July 2024), so since you're now back I've opened up a new dispute resolution where you can properly represent your point of view instead of doing ad hominem attacks on me like you're doing in the talk page.

Kindly represent your view in detail here for a proper resolution:

Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#RRR 2 SaibaK (talk) 00:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hii sir

Hii sir 2409:408C:2CBC:F5E7:0:0:2B09:F414 (talk) 12:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Role

Is Sivannarayana Naripeddi and that lady playing Priyamani's parents? [17] [18] DareshMohan (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hii sir

Please edit singer malavika madam biography Vishal Bhardwaj singer (talk) 07:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Big fan of you recent creations! DareshMohan (talk) 23:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 13:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to creating small films articles that too of quality. DareshMohan (talk) 19:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only do small edits in other language film articles, but not comfortable in creating and doing large edits in other language-film articles. Kudos to you to edit articles from multiple language-films. Especially, your edits related to names of the cast. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 17:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharanya Pradeep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nizamabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Role names

I think in some cases mother/father of ___ isn't preferred. Why can't we just use ___'s mother/father. If it is victim, etc., your method seems okay. DareshMohan (talk) 19:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I randomly use both cases alternatively, so either of them are fine to use. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After changing the roles in Sunil filmography for Rainbow, Drona and Pallakilo Pellikoothuru. I have come to the conclusion that several of his character names in unknown films/box office flops are incorrect. Correct me if I'm wrong. The older revision is [19]. I did not hear those names in his portions, so I removed them. DareshMohan (talk) 06:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you find out the roles from videos available on YouTube. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, technically all role names are original research only. DareshMohan (talk) 01:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Had to watch the full movie of Gowtam SSC just to remove the wrong credits. Should have checked end credits first. @TraineeEngineer: added all right names but Sunil is an error. DareshMohan (talk) 08:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning List of highest-grossing Indian films

Hi @Jayanthkumar123, Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.. Could explain why you are doing this?Anoop Bhatia (talk) 05:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have many edits as per the main articles with proper sources and are constructive. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jayanthkumar123 That doesn't justify what you are doing now. Times Now is not a green source according to ICTF, and using a new source is not a valid reason to remove all reliable sources from the entry. I am reverting the change as it is unacceptable and shows preferential treatment for the films in question.Anoop Bhatia (talk) Anoop Bhatia (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jayanthkumar123 Some sources used previously don't make them reliable. ICTF guidelines and Wikipedia's guidance mandate the use of green sources for factual reporting, such as box office figures. Even if a new source is added, it is not a licence to remove already present sources or their range. If you want to use timesnownews.com, you should request a reliability review for it rather than vandalising the page. I am reverting the edit, because it's preferential treatment for a film.Anoop Bhatia (talk) 06:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jayanthkumar123:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Film%2FIndian_cinema_task_force#Reliability_assessment_request

Support this, if you want to do it in the right way. I am not against any news sources but paid reporting by many news outlets makes it non-usable for factual reporting.Anoop Bhatia (talk) 06:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Range manipulation List of highest-grossing South Indian films

Hi @Jayanthkumar123, You are trying to manipulate the box office figures by providing sources that are questionable in reliability and overruling reliable sources according to WP:ICTFSOURCES. Additionally, you are not explaining your reasons for the change. Either get green approval from ICTF for the sources you want to add or stop making non-constructive edits. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 05:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any specific reason for removing the range from various pages without even providing an edit summary or explanation? You are an experienced user with over 15k edits. Not something I'd expect from someone who's been around for over 3 years. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kurchi Madathapetti moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kurchi Madathapetti. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charliehdb (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

aaaa

Mahati Swara Sagar

Can you create an article for this guy? [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] Also see the sources here: [25]. DareshMohan (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, will create an article. He is an established composer indeed. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 18:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my favorite song of his [26]. DareshMohan (talk) 03:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good one! Mine is "Choosi Chudangane" from Chalo. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Draft:Cham Cham (song)"

This song deserves an article sometime. Wanna collab later? [27] [28] DareshMohan (talk) 07:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I can contribute to it. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 12:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add table to Aa Karaala Ratri#Awards. DareshMohan (talk) 23:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fix second half of plot relating to girl in Draft:Billa Ranga (film). DareshMohan (talk) 09:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Telugu film actors

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Telugu film actors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benz Circle Flyover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benz Circle Flyover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benz Circle Flyover until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of refs

Hey, kindly follow through your edits on various movies pages. The unexplained content removal is resulting in the formation of orphaned references which requires rescue by AnomieBot. Please do not remove references from such pages without proper rationale. If you are removing, you MUST provide a valid rationale and remove the various other footnotes and inline citations of the same reference. Otherwise, it will constitute as disruptive test edits. Please be mindful. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Formal complaint raised against user @JayanthKumar123 because of him ignoring RFC

Hi @Jayanthkumar123

I've now raised a formal complaint against your conduct of ignoring RFC. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by user @Jayanthkumar123 despite consensus achieved through RFC

SaibaK (talk) 14:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing RRR for not deferring to consensus found on the talk page, and continuing to do so after an ANI report was raised against your editing pattern.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – robertsky (talk) 16:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do respond to the ANI thread on your editing behaviour on the article. – robertsky (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article List of most expensive Indian films did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Please refer to WP:IBTIMES and WP:ICTFSOURCES. You can also take discussion to ICTFSOURCES talk page. RangersRus (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Ramesh Cheppala said here that he narrated the story of Kousalya Supraja Rama (2008 film) to D. Ramanaidu [29]. He also said he wrote the screenplay. Then why is the story and screenplay credited to the director and not him -- is he even credited in the end credits? DareshMohan (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surya Prasad is credited for screenplay, story and direction (see here--[30] at 1:42). Ramesh Cheppala is nowhere credited. Although, he said it an interview, it's better to go by the credits in the movie. We can mention the above TOI source and say "In an interview Ramesh Cheppala told that he has narrated the story to Ramanaidu, but for unknown reasons he was not credited". Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://zeenews.india.com/tamil/movies/beast-movie-beats-valimai-box-office-collection-less-than-12-days-390612

[2] ttps://telugu.news18.com/news/movies/rrr-jr-ntr-ram-chara-rajamoulis-rrr-movie-theatrical-run-closed-and-total-box-office-collections-ta-1315178.html

[1]

[2]