User talk:Jake Gutteridge

Welcome!

Hi Jake Gutteridge! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space whessgre experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jake Gutteridge. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Violating WP:RS and WP:MEMORIAL after numerous warnings

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So here's the thing: evading your block via logged-out editing was unwise; that you did so is established via WP:CHECKUSER evidence, so there's really no point in denying it. I have blocked your two IPs for a while, and in addition you are going to have to commit to a couple of things if you ever wish to get unblocked. First of all, you will have to declare your COI. Second, you must edit in accordance with our guidelines, particularly in that article you are so clearly involved with. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BLOCKAGE

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jake Gutteridge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia moderators only deleted parts of the Cedars Park article (which I wrote) leaving it looking lazily written. I deleted those half-empty articles, not logged in, under my IP address, and was consequently given a permanent block. This was a genuine change and not meant to be 'disruptive'! Wikimedia customer support e-mail keep re-directing me to these discussion pages. Kindly remove my blocks as I do not believe they are justified. Jake Gutteridge (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You edited while logged out, while your account was blocked. That is block evasion. You also don't address the points made by Drmies. I'm not sure what you mean by "Wikipedia customer support email" as Wikipedia does not have 'customer support' or customers for that matter. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone removed my citations, then blocked me for insufficient crediting (disgusting) and that has contributed to my permanent blockage. Edits I made were removing content that I had created, this is not disruption to the article as the half-emptied sections looked terrible and I don't want this page to be scruffy. The e-mail address I contacted is [email protected]. Jake Gutteridge (talk) 01:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you remove the section 'Theobalds Square', as I created this and someone has removed the crucial part about the hauntings. Jake Gutteridge (talk) 01:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samsung GT-E1205Y

Hello, Jake Gutteridge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samsung GT-E1205Y".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]