User talk:IntfictExpert

Welcome!

Hello, IntfictExpert! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Image copyright problem with Image:Age of Empires 2 Screenshot.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Age of Empires 2 Screenshot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Age of Empires 2 Screenshot.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Age of Empires 2 Screesnshot.jpg. The copy called Image:Age of Empires 2 Screesnshot.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 07:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Montycoon screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Montycoon screenshot.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kings campaign.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kings campaign.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Smart

I've responded on my talk page --Chris 10:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Marioparty2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Marioparty2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hey. I saw you listed yourself to become an admin over at RfA. Firstly, I would like to extend thanks to you on behalf of the community for your willingness to help the community. It really is appriciated. However, your RfA was malformed, meaning that it was incorrectly listed. Firstly, all nominations should be placed at the top of the page, not the bottom. Further, your RfA was incomplete, with no answers to the mandatory questions that go along with RfA and no place for supports/opposes/neutrals. For further information on requesting adminship and the proper way to list yourself for it, see WP:GRFA. It has a lot of useful information. Besides that, best of luck with the request and happy editing, SorryGuy Talk 03:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should remind you that, thanks for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. However, you need to fill out every single question and form before you transclude, otherwise, your RfA won't count! Good luck, and you may want to consider taking this test. This should test to see whether you are ready to be one. —B o L 04:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate for proper formatting. Thanks. — DarkFalls ^talk 04:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn your RfA because it does not appear that it has any chance of passing at this time. Please obtain more experience, listen to the comments at the request, and continue your excellent work. Happy editing! --Agüeybaná 19:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree. I've reviewed your sysop test, and what kind of an answer is "revert if I feel like it?" BoL 19:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that your RFA did not succeed, I just wanted to say to study policy more before you go again and hope to see that your next RFA goes well. Oyster guitarist 20:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Username change

{{helpme|I would like my username to be changed to "InfocomExpert".}}

Hi. Please make you request at Wikipedia:Changing username.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme|Please change my username to "IntfictExpert". And don't tell me to go to WP:CHU, cause I am getting no answers there.}}

Please go to Wikipedia:Changing username; your username will be changed soon. Also, please try not to use any more {{helpme}} templates for this request. Thank you, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 05:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I thought I said not to tell me to go to WP:CHU. Could you please change my name NOW, because I am not getting any responses.

I'm afraid that not just anyone can change your name. Only the 'crats can do that and the only way to find them is on WP:CHU. Don't worry too much, they will respond to you eventually.--Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 00:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been changed. In the future, please consider being more civil with your requests. Thank you. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 00:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something else

{{helpme|Look at the thing I said here.}}

Do you have a diff link? —B o L 05:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Age of Empires 2 Screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Age of Empires 2 Screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Julian Revermann

I have nominated Julian Revermann, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Revermann. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Paste (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme|Please block me for a month because I'll be away for a month.}}

Sorry, we don't block people because they ask for it. If you have a strong-enough password, your account should be secure. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 13:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Party DS

Why'd you change the image? You could've created a new image, and we could've included both in the article. - ~VNinja ~ —Preceding comment was added at 19:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spin 'n' Say controversy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spin 'n' Say controversy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 12:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry About the Help Desk

I really didnt notice, it took me about 5 minutes to type the question because i had something to do half way through. I refreshed and didnt see anything new. Must of not refreshed right.. and i must of had an old revision. Really sorry =[ Kingpomba (talk) 10:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC) .[reply]

Help

{{helpme|What is a userbox that says something like "This user contributes on a high basis to the Reference Desk"?}}

If there is one, it would say so at the ref. desk. I don't believe there is one. Mm40|Talk|Sign|Review 23:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The best solution I have found is nice one, {{User:Patricknoddy/Userboxes/User Wikipedia reference desk}}, used in conjunction with this category. Category:Wikipedians who contribute to the reference desk. Hope that helps.--Kerotan ^{Leave Me a Message} Have a nice day :) 23:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

languages

Are you really a native speaker of French, Japanese and Indonesian? You must have quite an unusual history! —Tamfang (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am not a native speaker of those languages. I merely have experience in those languages. I might have used the wrong template. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 10:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI, June 2008

Request answered. Chafford (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA nom

Thanks for the nomination, but at this stage I will decline. I had just been thinking at how I'm probably not as active here as I would have to be to make a decent admin. Confusing Manifestation(Say hi!) 23:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Google question at WP:RD/C

It seems that you duplicated your question into the June 8 section, which caused some confusion because the two copies then fell out of sync. You may even have missed a useful answer to your question. I've deleted the extra copy and merged the final two comments into the archived version (which is still transcluded onto the current page anyway). --Tardis (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marpar6char.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marpar6char.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Woodford Primary School

I have nominated Woodford Primary School, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodford Primary School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mattinbgn\^talk 00:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bumping on the Reference Desk

You have shown a habit of bumping your posts on the reference desk. That is not allowed as it changes the date of the post by moving it lower. This is not a message board. It is a reference desk. You ask for a reference and the users will attempt to find one. You appear to be using it as a message board where you demand answers to any problem you may be having and attack users with vulgarities and threats if you don't get the answer you want. Unlike most websites, abusive and improper usage of Wikipedia will easily cause your account to be blocked from editing. -- kainaw ™ 13:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your conduct is again under discussion at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#Thread bumping. The clear consensus is that one should not bump threads down the page to seek competitive advantage for your question, over all other questions. Such action is extremely impolite. Should you continue to bump your threads, please be assured that action will be taken against you; and in any event, bump edits will be reverted on sight. I encourage you to join in the discussion should you have a different opinion.

I note, in looking at some of your contributions, your swearing at people seeking to provide assistance to you. That is a really reprehensible & inexcusable thing to do, and I'd ask you not, ever, to repeat it. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copying and pasting a thread from an older date on the Reference Desk to a newer date on the Reference Desk is "bumping." You have been warned about bumping multiple times. Pretending not to understand will not help. If you disagree with this policy, see Wikipedia talk:Reference desk#Thread bumping. -- kainaw ™ 22:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of the verified oldest people, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Enric Naval (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so, why a list of 101 instead of 100? I'm really curious. Maybe they forgot someone? :) --Enric Naval (talk) 02:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: And please stop trying to start soap-box topics about Nintendo.

replying to this.
On Wikipedia? I'm not sure that there is a place on Wikipedia to voice your opinions on Nintendo products. Outside of Wikipedia there's lots of forums where you can discuss this.
--http://forums.gamespy.com/gamespy/
--http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/boardlist.php?category=3
--http://forums.directionalpad.com/
--http://forums.somethingawful.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=44 (Incredibly, this forum actually requires money to join, but they somehow have zillions of members!)
There are just examples, I don't really frequent many forums so I can't vouch for their quality, etc. Hope this helps. APL (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IntfictExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did you actually see what my IP was? Mine is 124.181.14.142, based in Australia. Besuto and Haymail are my alternate accounts. 98E's is 71.233.232.196, based in America. So please unblock.

Decline reason:

Hi, 98E. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IntfictExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You didn't read my request, did you? My IP address is 124.181.14.142, based in Australia, and 98E's is 71.233.232.196, based in America. Besuto and Haymail are not really 98E socks. Those accounts, which are not 98E socks, are on this IP, not 98E's IP.

Decline reason:

And you would know this how? In any case, if this is true, I would prefer someone with Checkuser be the one to unblock you. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IntfictExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Go ahead and do another checkuser on both me AND 98E and you'll see that I'm not him. I don't know him and I don't edit the same articles that he did. And blocking people for false reasons makes them really stressed. I cried for an hour after finding out I was blocked.

Decline reason:

Cry all you want, a checkuser was performed and it was confirmed that you are in fact 98E. — Tiptoety ^talk 02:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IntfictExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No it wasn't. Besuto and Haymail are my alternate accounts, but they are not 98E sockpuppets. One more time for clarity: My IP address is 124.181.14.142, based in Australia, and 98E's is 71.233.232.243, based in America. Understood? Stop being mean to me. I don't know 98E. I don't even edit the same articles as him.

Decline reason:

And how would you know the IP of an account you claim to have no affiliation with? — Tiptoety ^talk 03:00, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{helpme|I know it's his IP because it said so on User talk:71.233.232.243.}}

Take it up with an admin then. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per your emailed questions to me, users with Checkuser regularly review these too, and step in and confirm the results if need be. The fact that none has is telling. If you want an admin with CU to review this, why don't you email one of them instead? Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme|I'd like to e-mail every checkuser about this. How can I do so? Because [email protected] seems to be closed.}}

I don't think there is a way. Ask Daniel Case. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(comment reinserted)An admin already CUed it; that's why it's blocked. Stop this; every time 98E gets blocked he lawyers until his page gets blocked. Just lock it now. The Evil Spartan (talk) 03:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spartan, I am not 98E. Did you not see what I wrote above? My IP address is in Australia, while 98E's is in America.

Special:ListUsers/CheckUser lists the current checkusers, though I imagine emailing more than a couple of them could be seen as spamming. Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 03:55, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme|Could someone please tell User:Tiptoety what I wrote in the first helpme?}}

{{helpme|And don't listen to Spartan's protection request. If you protect this page, please do so for a few months.}}

Please quit abusing the helpme template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But I want to see people's responses! Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 04:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Seriously, come back and edit Wikipedia when you're old enough to figure out why the hell it's so easy to catch you every time. Seriously, adults know this kind of thing. The Evil Spartan (talk) 04:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not 98E, Spartan. I have an Australian address, not an American one like 98E. I am old enough. 98E is an adult himself. Stop harassing me or you will be blocked. I am 15, he is 22. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 04:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked falsely and you know it. So please unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IntfictExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock for the last time. I have an Australian address and 98E has an American address. Besuto and Haymail are my alternate accounts, but they're not 98E socks either. Look, I just asked Spartan if the other account was his, right? That was a simple question. You did not have to do all this for asking that question.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oops, you just admitted to making an edit with User:Haymail. That was pretty dim. — The Evil Spartan (talk) 04:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)}}[reply]

Of course I did. I already said that Haymail was my alternate account. And you're not an admin, Spartan, so you're not supposed to be reviewing my request. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 04:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I have a question. Above, when asked how you knew 71.233.232.243 was the IP used by 98E, you said "I know it's his IP because it said so on User talk:71.233.232.243". But that would require knowing the IP to begin with (User:71.233.232.243 states that it is the IP used by 98E, but 98E has no mention of 71.233.232.243). So to repeat Tiptoety's question: How did you know that 98E's IP was 71.233.232.243? Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 04:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme|Because I looked at 98E's sock category}}. Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 04:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse of unblock template

That's 5 already. Whether TES should've declined it or not is actually not that relevant, because it's past the point where this page should be protected. As soon as an admin checks protection requests, this talk page will be protected. Enigma ^message 04:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using the helpme template. This is not what it is to be used for Dusti^SPEAK!! 04:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Squared Away

Non-free rationale for File:Montycoon screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Montycoon screenshot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Age of Empires Four listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Age of Empires Four. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]