User talk:Hebrooks87
Welcome!
Hello, Hebrooks87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - BanyanTree 15:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a question regarding your edit to Tornado. I was trying to present a neutral point of view on the subject, by discussing the pros and cons of the TORRO scale. Presently, tornadoes in the US are rated on the Fujita scale, but many times a survey team will denote a tornado as "high end F3" or "low end F3", etc. With the TORRO scale tornadoes like this will appear differently in archives, while current US archives only present the maximum F-scale rating on the path, not its relative strength within a particular F-category.
I suppose saying "it is helpful" is unverifiable and I shouldn't have phrased it like that in the first place anyway. I figure if I rephrase it as "it may be helpful", everyone will be happy.
Aside from that, good edits on tornado related articles, especially catching that error on the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak page. Runningonbrains 22:24, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for adding that citation for the Ajax commercial. It had been sitting without citation for a year, I was beginning to lose hope, lol. -Runningonbrains 19:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
It has been mentionned in the Wikiproject Severe Weather talk page but here is a link to the discussion.--JForget 01:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)