User talk:Frombelow

Greetings...

Hello, Frombelow, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! Skomorokh 06:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 FIFA World Cup

The thing is that it's not particularly relevant to the tournament. I'm sure other people will have an opinion on this, so I'll leave it up to them to decide whether or not that link is pertinent, but I personally don't think it is. – Pee Jay 13:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blikkiesdorp.JPG

Hi, did you mean to upload File:Blikkiesdorp.JPG with an invalid license? Pictures on wikipedia should be free such as CC-BY or Public domain. You can change the license or upload again with a free license if it got the chop. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you're right. fixed the license for my photo. thanksFrombelow (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your User Talk Introduction and The Five Pillars of Wikipedia

Hi, Frombelow, welcome to WP! May I call your attention on the possible head-on confrontation between the principles of this great invention and yours? Particularly your declaration that you see WP “not as an impartial source of information, but as a space of contestation within which a battle of who owns history is being fought” has reminded me of Don Quixote tilting at Windmills, as there seems to be a hugh consensus here that WP is not a battleground. I hope you the best. --Zack Holly Venturi (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, but you misread what is written on the link you presented: WP is not a battleground. Yes, of course it should not be a "place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, or nurture hatred or fear". I think it is fair enough to say there is near consensus on such an issue. However, I'm not speaking of it as a battleground for personal conflicts. Rather, I see it as a battleground of ideas. There's no such thing as impartiality whether this is in the media or in an encyclopedia. Impartiality is a misnomer for the status quo. If there's no such thing as impartiality, then what is the purpose of Wikipedia? What is the purpose of the media in general? It is clearly a battleground of ideas whether other editors think so or not. Unfortunately, certain perspectives get shafted because - among other reasons - lack of access to Internet and lack of literacy in general. I'm interesting in brining those opinions to the forefront to balance out wikipedia a bit.Frombelow (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Blikkiesdorp.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Blikkiesdorp.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 02:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: District 9

Hi. We need more writers contributing to this article. Please see the talk page for open tasks and join the discussion. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 10:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Facebook

Just checking in --Zobango (talk) 19:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Abahlali baseMjondolo. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FFMG (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Abahlali baseMjondolo, you may be blocked for vandalism. FFMG (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frombelow. You have new messages at Muhandes's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Picture the Homeless

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Picture the Homeless, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.picturethehomeless.org/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SolvedFrombelow (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In defense of the Internet

A blog I read .. http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/in-defense-of-the-internet/ Wizzy…☎ 06:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, saw that too. Very cool articleFrombelow (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another article http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/about-glue-and-superglue/ Wizzy…☎ 12:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Social movements in south Africa and categories

Hi Frombelow, I don't think that it is appropriate to add to Mandela Park Backyarders and similar articles categories like "Urban studies and planning organisations" or "Human habitats". Their use in the context of a South African anti-eviction movement seems misleading. Not to mention that other categories like "Organisations based in South Africa" and "Social movements" are wholly redundant because "South African social movements" is already a subcategory of both of these. Adding an excessive number of categories only contributes to the visual clutter at the bottom of the page. I will not revert your edits, but I suggest you be more selective about the categories that are relevant in an article, and those that are not. Ciao, LK 02:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Underlying lk (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of The Con Magazine

The article The Con Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New agazine, too young to have become notable yet. Article creation premature. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 11:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Con Magazine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Con Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Con Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on The Con Magazine. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit was in good faith. I gave my explanation when I removed you're request for deletion.Frombelow (talk) 11:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's your explanation that is the problem, not the edit in itself. Assuming someone is biased is not really the same as "assuming good faith"... --Randykitty (talk) 12:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that means you didn't understand my point. My point was that you're proposed deletion was based on a type of bias. Everyone is biased even those who edit in good faith. I was not saying that you're proposed deletion was in bad faith. Far from that. What I was saying is that its based on a bias (held by most wiki editors and people in general) against small media outlets. This is problematic because who is to say that a small media outlet such as The Con isn't notable? What makes it not notable? The fact that its small? Or the fact that it isn't mainstream? Or the fact that it is South African? Notability can be according to one's point of view. Obviously you don't think it is notable. However, I do think it is notable otherwise why would I take the time to create the page in the first place? I don't benefit from creating the page so I have no other reason to create it other than my own view that it is in fact notable - nevermind the fact that thousands of people already read The Con, they've been republished in a number of places, and they have well-established an notable well-known journalists as regular contributors. I therefore move to have the page remain at very least as a stub.Frombelow (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Death of Nqobile Nzuza may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

20131004.htm Letter from Chomsky, Zizek, et al to Jacob Zuma, President, Republic of South Africa], 4 October 2013</ref> and Anglican [[Bishop Rubin Phillip]].<ref>[http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Frombelow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AbM navbox

Hello, just in case you are around, I have been making a draft navbox to put on articles related to Abahlali baseMjondolo articles and I'd love to get your feedback on it! The draft is sitting here currently. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 16:04, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayanda Ngila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayanda Ngila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayanda Ngila (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 15:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reclaim The City has been accepted

Reclaim The City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 11:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for creating Lindokuhle Mnguni! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Pinedo Boveda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pablo Pinedo Boveda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 We already had this discussion in the talk section of that page. You questioned the article saying its citations are not reliable or independent. I answered you that they all are reliable and independent. For instance, two of the articles cited are the two largest and most respected newspapers in South Africa - the [Daily Maverick]] and the Mail and Guardian. Are you saying the two largest and most respected newspapers in the country are not reliable and independent? Another article is from El Periódico de Aragón, a prominent newspaper in Spain. I could go on. What more do you want? Further, all the information provide in the article is verifiable if you actually read the articles cited. I challenged you to name one specific citation or one specific claim that didn't pass muster. You never responded to that. That is because they all are reliable independent media sources. You can't actually challenge me on the facts. You have failed to make your own case.

Now, despite failing to make your own case, you have moved the article unilaterally to draftspace. This is bad procedure. Its a waste of my time and of other people's time You have to make out the case that the citations are unreliable. You can't just claim it as fact and act unilaterally without providing evidence for this.

I would therefore appreciate it if either make out your case clearly so I can answer it or move it back as a published article. Thanks. Frombelow (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reclaim The City

Hey I just saw Reclaim The City - nice one for making it! Mujinga (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sure. it still needs some work but its a start. Frombelow (talk) 14:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pablo Pinedo Boveda (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pablo Pinedo Boveda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 11:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frombelow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 11:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is copyleft licensed. I have now edited the page providing a link to the license. Frombelow (talk) 23:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pablo Pinedo Boveda

Hello, Frombelow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pablo Pinedo Boveda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]