Jump to content

User talk:Filmgoer/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Great job on your high quality good article work on Wikipedia and also creation of new articles, awesome effort! Right cite (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Good, the Bad and the Ugly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sound of Music (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Sound of Music (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Social Network

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Social Network you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 20:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Avengers: Endgame

Hello! Your submission of Avengers: Endgame at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

New articles

Hello, may I ask why you create drafts and request for them to be moved into the mainspace? You can create drafts in your own sandbox and move them into the mainspace. It is a travesty that Draft:Cry Macho (film) is not an article based on the declining editor's false reasoning. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 20:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Alex is partly right. You can create a sandbox page with any title, like you could have created User:Some Dude From North Carolina/Cry Macho (film). However, I would advise against cutting and pasting. You can move the article from your sandbox to the mainspace yourself, preserving the page history. The sandbox page will become a redirect link, and you can add the {{db-author}} template to delete it. From my experience, the draft space is more for collaboration where no one editor is developing a topic on their own (e.g., Marvel Cinematic Universe films that haven't started filming). Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 00:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
    Some Dude From North Carolina, Erik and in case there is any redirect already there with the title where you want to move the completed userspace/mainspace article, you just need to ask for a G6 deletion that it is holding a move and it must be deleted. Since you're a good & an experienced editor, you should not submit articles through AfC. We have already so much backlog. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

All My Puny Sorrows (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, All My Puny Sorrows (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pamzeis (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Wheels of Fortune (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wheels of Fortune (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheels of Fortune (film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 10:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Brooklyn Nine-Nine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of awards and nominations received by Brooklyn Nine-Nine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 21:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

FL nom removal

Hi, Some Dude From North Carolina. I'll close the nomination tomorrow if nobody else gets around to it before then. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Avengers: Endgame

On 11 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Avengers: Endgame, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Avengers: Endgame was untitled until December 2018, as its title was considered a spoiler for the film and its predecessor, Avengers: Infinity War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Avengers: Endgame. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Avengers: Endgame), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spider-Man 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spider-Man 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

The article The Good, the Bad and the Ugly you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Infobox discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Better Call Saul - Mijo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Better Call Saul - Mijo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC) Kailash29792 (talk) 11:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

"The Walking Dead Holiday Special" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Walking Dead Holiday Special. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 18#The Walking Dead Holiday Special until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Magician's Elephant (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Magician's Elephant (film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magician's Elephant (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shazam! (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shazam! (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shazam! (film)

The article Shazam! (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shazam! (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 16:48, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Social Network

The article The Social Network you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Social Network for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi fellow North Carolinian

Hello there! Shinyedit (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

@Shinyedit: Hello. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 14:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

"Reagan & Gorbachev" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Reagan & Gorbachev. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 27#Reagan & Gorbachev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sound of Music (film)

The article The Sound of Music (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Sound of Music (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 23:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Start review

Can you start the nomination of Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales/GA2? I have improving this article a lot, so you want to take a look. Chompy Ace 00:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Elliot321 -- Elliot321 (talk) 06:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

The article Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Elliot321 -- Elliot321 (talk) 07:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

The article Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Elliot321 -- Elliot321 (talk) 00:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Pirates

I think something went wrong cause I’m reading the review and it says passed but I got a message saying it failed. Rusted AutoParts 03:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spider-Man 2

The article Spider-Man 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spider-Man 2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 20:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Sound of Music (film)

Hello! Your submission of The Sound of Music (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spider-Man 2

The article Spider-Man 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spider-Man 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 06:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Sacred Games

Hey, are you done with the review? I will be resolving all the queries at once. Cheers. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: Many of my last GA nominations/reviews had reviewers look at a section at a time so they could tackle all issues one at a time. I was trying to do the same. But if you want me to give you all my notes, I'll add them later today or tomorrow. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 15:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, just finish it all at once. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy Ending (Schitt's Creek)

Thanks for your recent edits! I hope Good article status is your goal. Either way, keep up the great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Another Believer: I was wondering if someone had seen my recent edits! I am trying to get it there. Thank you for noticing. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 00:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Some Dude From North Carolina, Good luck! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Shazam! Film - Zachary Levi On Set 2018 - By Steve Wilkie.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Shazam! Film - Zachary Levi On Set 2018 - By Steve Wilkie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Hello! Your submission of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

BTH seasons

I see that drafts for BTH seasons exist and you've been updating them. Would it be appropriate to make their season articles, but not a "List of episodes page" since it doesn't have enough? So there will be main articles in the series overview but not to an individual list of episodes yet. CartoonnewsCP (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@CartoonnewsCP: Usually, a "list of episodes" articles comes first, and that pretty much means you're now free to split the article into seasons. So, I would wait until this show gets renewed with a 3rd, or even 4th season, and then focus on season articles, and maybe, even some notable episodes. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 13:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Jeepers Creepers

Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I did a look over of your GA nomination of Jeepers Creepers (2001 film) and I found some things I think you should work on so that it passes nomination. When I was looking over the production section I noticed that it would really benefit from a rewrite as the development section is not directly based on information confirmed by the filmmakers. I suggest looking on the structuring of other GA articles for guidance on how everything should be worded and structured. My work on Begotten might also prove helpful for you just to show how structuring and wording things should be like. You do not have to follow my format of sourcing in Begotten, but the Refname input should be more specific. For example "Refname=RedHerring" should honestly be changed to the author's last name and the publication date. These are just a little suggestions to help you on your road to have it pass GA status. Keep up the great work and happy editing!--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Shazam! (film)

On 11 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shazam! (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it took Zachary Levi an average of twenty minutes to get into costume as the titular character in Shazam!? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shazam! (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shazam! (film)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

"Dave McNary" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dave McNary. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 11#Dave McNary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Shazam! Film - Zachary Levi On Set 2018 - By Steve Wilkie.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shazam! Film - Zachary Levi On Set 2018 - By Steve Wilkie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Whpq (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Spider-Man

Hi Some Dude From North Carolina. I noticed that you got Spider-Man 2 promoted. And since there used to be a topic on Spider-Man films I was wondering if you were planning on nominating it for Good Topics. GamerPro64 04:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Noticed you also did a Pirates movie so that would cover this topic too. GamerPro64 04:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
@GamerPro64: I don't think the Spider-Man films topic would work as Spider-Man, Spider-Man Strikes Back, and Spider-Man: The Dragon's Challenge are not at GA-status. The Pirates topic, however, might work, so thanks for telling me! Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 15:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alice in Borderland (TV series)

Hello! Your submission of Alice in Borderland (TV series) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Mailing list

Hello – the reference in the 3rd and 4th paragraphs of Can You Hear Me? (Doctors) is to a weekly mailing list email sent out by Metro, in which Lloyd had an interview in – how else would I go about directly sourcing that particular email, since it's an email? – DarkGlow (✉) 22:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi – I believe I've addressed the concerns with subsections so the hold is no longer necessary. They would have been done sooner – you may have seen I placed an 'in use' tag to perform said changes, which was ignored... Hope the changes are ok. – DarkGlow (✉) 23:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
@DarkGlow: I have just removed a faulty reference and have promoted the article to GA-status. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 00:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Sound of Music (film)

On 18 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Sound of Music (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that prior to becoming the highest-grossing film of 1965, The Sound of Music was initially criticized for its romanticism and sentimentality? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Sound of Music (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Sound of Music (film)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

RunningTiger123 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Comments: Hey, I wanted to reach out after the comments I made today at your FL nomination. I know my comments were probably nitpicky and seem unnecessary; I've just heard about minimum list lengths in the past, and I felt it would be a bit dishonest for me to not talk about a potential issue others had mentioned before. I want to make sure featured lists continue to display Wikipedia's best work, and to me, that means ensuring FL nominees are vetted as thoroughly as possible. For what it's worth, your work on the list (particularly sourcing) is really good, and once this issue is cleared up, I'd be more than happy to support this nomination. If you ever need any help with this nomination, let me know and I'll help where I can. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

DYK for Spider-Man 2

On 22 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Spider-Man 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Spider-Man 2 is considered to be one of the best and most influential superhero films of all time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Spider-Man 2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Spider-Man 2), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

On 23 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eli Wallach agreed to play the role of Tuco in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly immediately after watching the main title sequence of For a Few Dollars More? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Donkeyhead

Hi! I moved the article you created to Draft:Donkeyhead as it was undersourced. Films need to have significant coverage by independent, reliable sources to have a standalone article, and there is only one published article that is sourced. All sources that I saw look like they were derivative of the Deadline article, thus are not independent. Please continue to add to the draft when the subject receives more coverage, then submit the article for creation. Read more about what is expected for future films to have articles at WP:NFF. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 00:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dunces and Dragons

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dunces and Dragons you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dunces and Dragons

The article Dunces and Dragons you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dunces and Dragons for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Against The Ice

Hi! I moved the article you created to Draft:Against the Ice as it was undersourced. Films need to have significant coverage by independent, reliable sources to have a standalone article, and there is only one published article that is sourced. All sources that I saw look like they were derivative of that article, thus are not independent. Please continue to add to the draft when the subject receives more coverage, then submit the article for creation. Read more about what is expected for future films to have articles at WP:NFF. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 11:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Sundayclose (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Motherhood (ER)

Hello! Your submission of Motherhood (ER) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 18:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gio Benitez.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gio Benitez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Gio Benitez.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gio Benitez.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Quentin Tarantino - Motherhood - Filming.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Quentin Tarantino - Motherhood - Filming.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Cry Macho - Clint Eastwood - Filming During COVID-19.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cry Macho - Clint Eastwood - Filming During COVID-19.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gio Benitez.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gio Benitez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Another GAN if you're interested

I've got another GAN for you if you're interested, just thought you might be since you reviewed the first two seasons. Hoping to eventually clean up the parent article and get the four articles together to good topic. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

FLC

I've got an FLC to shill—List of awards and nominations received by Elliot Page—if you're interested in reviewing, but no pressure! Hope the Clint Eastwood one now has enough support to pass. It's always good to see formerly featured content taken up to modern standards and re-listed. — Bilorv (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Ebs Akintade

Dear Some Dude From North Carolina, you have deleted my Wikipedia Page: Ebs Akintade. I am a notable Presenter and Host on British Radio and TV and have only just realised it has gone. What can I do to return the page? I have links to all the work that I’ve done and these were not cited before. Ebuaki (talk) 07:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ebuaki: I didn't delete your page. The article was nominated for deletion because it didn't meet the criteria found at WP:BIO, and was deleted per consensus with other Wikipedians. Wikipedia articles are generally made on people who have done something considered "notable", such as Albert Einstein or Tom Holland. There have to be secondary sources covering the person in-depth, and there also have to be a substantial amount of citations to reliable pieces of information. I recommend waiting a bit, finding a way to get coverage from the media, and then creating an article with the Wikipedia:Article wizard. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 16:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

On 1 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (pictured) is the youngest woman ever to serve in the United States Congress? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Social Network

On 6 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Social Network, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first scene of the 2010 film The Social Network took 99 takes to finish? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Social Network. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Social Network), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Alice in Borderland (TV series)

On 8 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alice in Borderland (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the empty Shibuya Crossing featured on the series Alice in Borderland was filmed on a large green-screen set outside Tokyo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alice in Borderland (TV series). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alice in Borderland (TV series)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Cry Macho - Clint Eastwood - Filming During COVID-19.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cry Macho - Clint Eastwood - Filming During COVID-19.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

"Secret Headquarters" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Secret Headquarters. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 10#Secret Headquarters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

M. Night Shyamalan filmography

Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I am writing to ask you for help writing a correct introduction in Draft:M. Night Shyamalan filmography as I am not a native speaker and my English is not perfect. If you can do it, I would be very grateful to you. My intention is later to nominate it for a featured article, what do you think? Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@Bruno Rene Vargas: Thanks for the request! I'm happy to help by writing the introduction to the draft. However, I'll be busy today due to "work" and other stuff, so I'll have to do it tomorrow. But, nonetheless, I will do it when I have time as my 1st priority. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 13:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much, I send you a hug from Paraguay. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
I stop by again to thank you for helping me. The truth is that your writing was excellent. Greetings. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 21:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@Bruno Rene Vargas: No problem. I'm happy to help. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 21:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I would like to know if the article such as this could be presented for Wikipedia:FA or in what aspects do you think it should be improved? Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 22:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@Bruno Rene Vargas: I'm about to add references to the lead. With that done, and some references being manually archived, I think it would absolutely be ready for FA. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 22:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok, then I'll help you with that. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 Done All the links are archived. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 00:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Bruno Rene Vargas: I guess you can now nominate it to become a Featured List (FA). The instruction to do so are located here, and you can add me as a co-nominator if you want. With the current state of the article, it is possible that the article will achieve FL-status soon and that it will have a tiny star () by its title. Good luck. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 00:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Bruno Rene Vargas: Dude. Why the change to blue columns? It was good the way it was, and no other articles have columns like that. Can you revert it back to how it was? Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 13:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I made this modification because I had already written and edited this article on Wikipedia in Spanish and it was approved as a good article without any problem. I do not understand what the problem is that it looks different from the other existing articles. Also, wasn't it easier to just go to the version where you made your last edit instead of reverting my edits one by one?. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 13:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Bruno Rene Vargas: It's just that the FA nomination had a reviewer who had problems with the table, and most articles on the English Wikipedia which have achieved FA-status normally have regular tables. Furthermore, I don't know how to revert more than a single edit at a time. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 13:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Well, the process of manually reverting several edits at once is very easy, you just have to see the history and click on the date and time of your last edit, in this particular case your last modification before I modified the columns was this. Once there, simply press edit, then press save and voila, you avoid all those unnecessary investments. Greetings. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 13:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

@Bruno Rene Vargas: Thanks for the information! Sorry about the repetitive reverts. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 13:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

The WikiProject Film Award
I, Bruno Rene Vargas (talk), hereby award Some Dude From North Carolina the WikiProject Film Award for their valued contributions to WikiProject Film.
Awarded 18:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halloween (2018 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Halloween (2018 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lirim.Z -- Lirim.Z (talk) 13:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Anya Taylor-Joy filmography

Hi Dude, again I come to request your help. When you have time you can write the introduction of Draft: Anya Taylor-Joy filmography, I did it but copying a lot of unmodified text from the main article and I have been notified about it. Greetings. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@Bruno Rene Vargas: Actually, looking at the article and the draft, I'll have to pass on writing the introduction for a single reason. I find that the filmography article would be too short and that creating it wouldn't be reasonable. The Anya Taylor-Joy article is barely 50KB, and the page is only #Early_life and #Career before getting to her films and awards (see Kumail Nanjiani and Bo Burnham as examples of 50KB articles that haven't been split probably due to the same issue). Hope you can understand my reasoning, and why I don't think I should write the introduction since the article is quite small. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 16:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok, no problem, I understand. You could at least move Draft: Anya Taylor-Joy filmography to Anya Taylor-Joy filmography because I have already removed all the text that I had copied and just left the filmography itself. If you move the article you are free to redirect it again until her acting career is long enough to merit filmography. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
And what do you think of Bong Joon-ho filmography? Do you think you can write the introduction? Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Definitely, since he's a profound director. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 16:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
The introduction fit very well. Thank you very much for your help, the truth is that we make a good team. Anything you need you can also count on me. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback on the lead! At this rate, I also think we'll be working together often, and that we are an amazing team that will be able to improve Wikipedia in so many ways. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 17:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dunces and Dragons

The article Dunces and Dragons you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dunces and Dragons for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 20:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

For future reference and talk page stalkers that might be lurking, this message above shows the result of the first GA-nomination from 2014 which failed, not the one that was passed in 2021 that I started when I nominated it. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 20:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halloween (2018 film)

The article Halloween (2018 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Halloween (2018 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lirim.Z -- Lirim.Z (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes

The "Tomatometer".

Where do you see the average rating? Whenever I bring it up I don't see it. I always thought it was my device but maybe I'm just not catching it. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 22:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

@Samurai Kung fu Cowboy: You usually get the average rating by clicking on the Rotten Tomatoes percentage (located over the words "Tomatometer") which will open a page that shows you the overall percentage, average rating, and other details. Hope this, along with the image helps. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 22:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks. I don't think that could have been more helpful. I really appreciate the pics. I'll try it next time I update the score. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 03:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Home Sweet Home (The Walking Dead) has been accepted

Home Sweet Home (The Walking Dead), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: All My Puny Sorrows (film) (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is an unreleased film. Unreleased films are only notable if production itself has satisfied general notability, and there is nothing here that addresses general notability. Please update and resubmit when released.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Untitled comment

Across the River and Into the Trees (film) I would ask to please stop making adjustments to this page. The data we have and will continue to supply is correct and we do not wish for you to keep undoing entries. Many thanksAcrosstheriver21 (talk) 20:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC).

@Acrosstheriver21: I just want to start off by saying, (1) please stop adding promotional content to the page. (2) If you add content, you HAVE to add sources to verify it. (3) The words "award-winning" can't be used because they aren't neutral. (4) Using Daily Mail as a source is not allowed so don't cite it. (5) There are rules on Wikipedia, and content can NOT be added without sources to verify. This is to help readers trying to access new information. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 20:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
@Acrosstheriver21: I just removed whatever this edit was. Please remember to add your comments under a header. Anyway, please see WP:DAILYMAIL, a rule on Wikipedia that says that "There is consensus that the Daily Mail is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist." Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 21:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

for the ping. first time I got one. I'll respond soon. Starzoner (talk) 17:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Reassessment of GA-status for 1917 (2019 film)

1917 (2019 film), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Sprachraum (talk) 04:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Goofy Movie

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Goofy Movie you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DasallmächtigeJ -- DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 11:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Motherhood (ER)

On 1 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Motherhood (ER), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Quentin Tarantino directed a Mother's Day–themed episode of ER after being encouraged to do so by George Clooney? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Motherhood (ER). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Motherhood (ER)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Wonderful Wizard of Oz (upcoming film)

I am going to notify you that after submitting a complaint to the administrators, I was able to retrieve one of your drafts. Greetings. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Motherhood (ER)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Motherhood (ER) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RunningTiger123 -- RunningTiger123 (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism

you have been previously warned about vandalising our page by one of our officers. You will now be served with legal proceedings for damages and misinformation. You were warned.85.42.95.70 (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

you have previously been warned about vandalising our page by one of our company officers. You will now be served with legal proceedings for damages and misinformation.85.42.95.70 (talk) 16:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@85.42.95.70: I don't think you understand how Wikipedia works, and now you have legally threatened me for using Wikipedia as it should be used. YOU need to add RELIABLE sources verifying your claims. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Motherhood (ER)

The article Motherhood (ER) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Motherhood (ER) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RunningTiger123 -- RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Motherhood (ER)

The article Motherhood (ER) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Motherhood (ER) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RunningTiger123 -- RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

List of produced films included in The Black List

Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I would like to ask you again for your help and this time to write a better introduction in List of produced films included in The Black List because it is very short and it would be better if I had a slightly more elaborate introduction. I just want you to improve the introduction and clarify that the dates correspond to the first screening of the film, regardless of whether they were released at festivals, cinemas or via streaming. Meanwhile, I will continue to extend the list that is missing hundreds of films. I want to take this opportunity and ask you if it would be better to divide the list by decades, for example divide List of produced films included in The Black List in List of produced films included in The Black List (2006–2009) and List of produced films included in The Black List (2010–2020), what do you think? Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bruno Rene Vargas: Happy to be working again with you again! I'll be glad to write the introduction. On the topic of the naming, I believe that a division in decades would be better to have consistency with other articles. List of Warner Bros. films (1918–1929) is a great example, as the company didn't start in a ##00 year, and can be merged with the following decade. I suggest making three articles, titled List of produced films included in The Black List (2006–2009), List of produced films included in The Black List (2010–2019), and List of produced films included in The Black List (2020–2029). Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much again for the predisposition. I totally agree with your proposal because if we don't divide it by decades the lists will be too long. I even think that in the future, when all the films are listed and with a good introduction we can present it for a featured list. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pilot (Breaking Bad)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pilot (Breaking Bad) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 06:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alice in Borderland (TV series)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alice in Borderland (TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Goofy Movie

The article A Goofy Movie you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Goofy Movie for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DasallmächtigeJ -- DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 20:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alice in Borderland (TV series)

The article Alice in Borderland (TV series) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alice in Borderland (TV series) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

The Walking Dead

Hey there. I'm thinking a talk page discussion might be worth having about this. The show has more than 20 credited producers for the episode, the three listed in the article are just some of them. Any one credited as a producer, whether it be "consulting producer", "co-executive producer" or just "producer", can be said to have produced the episode. These are just titles that serve as a hierarchy and promotion system primarily for the writers. You go from co-producer, to producer, to co-executive producer, and so on. Generally, most shows will have an actual "produced by" credit (aka line producer) which goes to the person in charge of production. Looking at the three names you've chosen, Deiboldt and Tse are writers who are simply at the "producer" hierarchy level, and Degard (after research) is in charge of post-production. Corey Reed, the co-writer of this episode, is a co-executive producer (he's higher up on the hierarchy among the writers) but is missing from the producers list in the article. The main issue is that infobox states "produced by" (which is a different credit) and not simply "producers". Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

@Drovethrughosts: Not much to discuss. Per the episode-article template on Wikipedia, we should only "include the show runner(s)" of the episode/series, so if you want, you can add them yourself. Thanks for bringing it up. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Filmgoer/Archive_1&oldid=1230964478"