Jump to content

User talk:Ednabrenze

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ednabrenze, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Ednabrenze! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Sabo Nanono moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Sabo Nanono, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi == Bagged ==

Hello. Would you be so kind so as to avoid using terms like bagged and adopt a more encyclopedic tone? More info on how to do it here: WP:TONE. Cheers.--Catlemur (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Edna, and thanks for all your new articles. I see a few of them have been biographies of women. If you intend to create more along the same lines you might like to become a member of wp:Women in Red where we could help you along. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks. Looking forward to editing more. Ednabrenze (talk) 07:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sabo Nanono

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ednabrenze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sabo Nanono, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sabo Nanono

[edit]

Hello, Ednabrenze. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sabo Nanono".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! RoanokeVirginia (talk) 20:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ebonyi State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Ednabrenze. Thank you for your work on Adeoye Aribasoye. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 03:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Nyanya (Abuja)

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nyanya (Abuja), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Ednabrenze. Thank you for your work on Charles Okah. Another editor, Vanderwaalforces, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article on English Wikipedia, and expanding human knowledge.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Ednabrenze. Thank you for your work on Nyanya (Abuja). Another editor, Vanderwaalforces, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article on English Wikipedia, and expanding human knowledge.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WHY

[edit]

WHY DID YOU REVERT MY EDITTTTTTTTTTTT 172.59.209.18 (talk) 03:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was reverted because the reason given for the change of dates in the article appeared to be misleading more so that you did not cite any source to support the changes Ednabrenze (talk) 03:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
already were though. I was correcting them because the source said was rebuilt in the 1890s, not 1880s. 172.59.209.18 (talk) 03:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Ednabrenze, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page Assessment

[edit]

Congratulations on your new page reviewer user right. Could you please review and assess the page V. M. Kutty. Thank You SRAppu 💬 07:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

[edit]

Hi Ednabrenze. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page not neutral

[edit]

Dear Ednabrenze, thank you for taking time to edit the article Justin Koduah which i created. in your edit, you tagged the page as not neutral. you did so without giving exact reasons you tagged it so. i would have thought that if you notice anything not neutral about the page, you would have gone to correct whatever errors therein rather than tag it as not neutral to dispute my young and credible edit journey on wikipedia. That said, may i know why you tagged the page as not neutral? Kum1989 (talk) 10:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is written like a personal opinion and it unduly promotes its subject. On Wikipedia there is a manual of style (MOS) that ensures that every article is written in encyclopedic neutral tone and every article must adhere to it including this article. You removed the tag without addressing the concern raised, I have restored the tag. And please do not remove until the issues raised is addressed. Ednabrenze (talk) 15:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources on Beti Hohler

[edit]

Hi – thanks for contributing to the new article on Beti Hohler! I added sources which I believe cover what little information the article currently contains, so I removed the template you added – please let me know if I overlooked something! Joriki (talk) 13:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Today I de-orphaned this article by adding a link at French protectorate of Tunisia article, See also section.

Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stephen Lash, your 'orphan' note

[edit]

Hello, I just de-orphaned Stephen Lash, linking it to 7 other articles, and will continue to find more. Thanks for the note and just wanted you to know I'll now remove your orphan note. Gregorcollins (talk) 12:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also, just curious

[edit]

I had put Stephen Lash's birthdate on the page, and it was mysteriously deleted a few minutes later. I checked that the date was accurate, just curious what this might be the result of - did it somehow violate something? Gregorcollins (talk) 13:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I didn't delete the birthdate, a different editor did for the reason that you used a primary source to support the birthdate instead of a reliable secondary source. Ednabrenze (talk) 06:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Ednabrenze, I saw you review my last article, I believe this article is ready, you can check it HERE, I want you to help mark it up as reviewed Gratefulking (talk) 12:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is not the right way to post a comment on talk page as this is under a closed thread. To respond to your request, pages are marked reviewed randomly if they met minimum requirement. I have taken a look at the articled you requested to be reviewed, unfortunately it does not meet minimum standard. Ednabrenze (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

[edit]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 2024-09-20 00:00:00. For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 04:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Ednabrenze, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 10:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of good faith edits as vandalism using rollback

[edit]

Please do not use rollback or anti-vandal for good faith edits. Edits like this are [1] are obviously not vandalism and I am perplexed why you think such an edit merits a level 3 warning.

[2] Traumnovelle (talk) 06:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]