User talk:Directorichr
Welcome!
Hello, Directorichr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Dr Sushil Kumar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pointillist (talk) 17:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Dr Sushil Kumar (original proposal)
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dr Sushil Kumar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Problems with Dr Sushil Kumar
[edit] Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dr Sushil Kumar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Dr Sushil Kumar. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. A reference can't be considered reliable if it does not directly support the text in the article. None of the current references refers to "whistle-blowing" by Dr Kumar, and most of them do not refer to Dr Sushil Kumar in any way. Adding these references gives a misleading impression that the claims in the article have been verified. If you have propoer sources for the claims in the article, please use them.
You keep messing up the formatting of references in Dr Sushil Kumar. Please see the versions that are repeatedly being reverted back to to how to correctly format references. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Final warning. Format the references properly. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
April 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dr Sushil Kumar has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): geocities\.com (links: http://www.geocities.com/indianfascism/fascism/fascist_shor_gul.htm,).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
The future of the Dr Sushil Kumar article is being discussed
[edit]Hello Directorichr. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump (miscellaneous)#Dr Sushil Kumar. You are welcome to add your own views there. Unless you are willing to join in discussions, it is possible that this article will be deleted. EdJohnston (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hello again. You left a comment by overwriting the Dr Sushil Kumar article. That is not how we normally leave messages for one another. You should see an 'Edit' button on the right of this page, near where this comment appears. Hit the 'Edit' button, then write your new comment in the large open box. Finish by signing your name using the four tildes ~~~~, which will expand into your name and the date. EdJohnston (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Dr Sushil Kumar
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dr Sushil Kumar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Though Sushil Kumar may be one of the current directors of Indian Council of Historical Research, no understandable sources can be found that testify to his importance. The PDF files hosted at www.ichrindia.org do not open. The Hindu provides not much more than a passing furor about one of his comments, printed 9 years ago. The inline citations don't seem to mention him personally. There are no complete references to any of his books. There are not enough sources provided here from which a proper article can be written. EdJohnston (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. EdJohnston (talk · contribs) 22:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Dr Sushil Kumar
[edit]I have nominated Dr Sushil Kumar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Sushil Kumar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. EdJohnston (talk) 00:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
If you would like to challenge the proposed deletion, please come to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Sushil Kumar and get involved in the discussion. Thanks - Pointillist (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dr Sushil Kumar, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Nja247 07:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)