User talk:Cyclonebiskit/Archive14

Good Article promotion

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making 1987 Gulf Coast tropical storm a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Cyclonebiskit/Archive14! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Merry Christmas

– TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year's!

– TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Category 6 hurricane

There is an ongoing discussion at List of Category 6 Atlantic hurricanes as to whether this page should be kept or redirected to List of Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes. Your input on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. United States Man (talk) 04:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sanvu track

JMA has released the full Sanvu track-HERE Please update the Sanvu 2012 track.png

Thank You! -- ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^^Talk_Contribs 05:28, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Cut the swearing out please.Jason Rees (talk) 19:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck yea! :) Hey, as long as CB is still contributing. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored, Jason Rees. Rcsprinter (rap) @ 20:30, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not be aggressive in edit summaries. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 20:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

None of the cursing was ever directed at anyone though, just the sentiment in general at the person who was adding unsourced content. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He was not being aggressive though. C'mon on guys a, give a longtime editor a break. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh baby so many problems at 2012 Pacific typhoon season. lack of citing reference etc. But thank you buddy for fixing it anyway :) cheers! Jpuligan 12 (talk) 00:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Yellow Evan, this is not worth causing a big uproar. Just let it go guys. United States Man (talk) 02:14, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Citation there is too much damn Citations, and please don't make the beautiful article become red! But you can do this: {{Citation needed}} if you want to cite.-- ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^^Talk_Contribs 14:31, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Cn-Span is better for alerting people who use our articles such as the Australian BoM to problems with the article than {{CN}}.Jason Rees (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still say, that's far too much damn citations. I can tolerate ^{[citation needed]} ones. I wonder what is Cyclonebiskit up to.-- ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^^Talk_Contribs 04:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, there is no such thing as too many citations. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 04:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Im Sorry Earth100 everything you write has to be verifiable and be able to be backed up with a source that is in the article. As i said earlier the Cn-Span is better for informing people that there is a problem with the article than Citation needed is imo as it is more visual. I also note that you do not own the article and that Cyclonebiskit is trying to get the best article possible.Jason Rees (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To quote Cyclonebiskit himself, "I'm pointing out that the information needs to be verified with citations and clearly the CN-span is more effective at getting the message across".Jason Rees (talk) 04:26, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

....?? ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^^Talk_Contribs 06:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter

We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees Cwmhiraeth (submissions) as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees Grapple X (submissions) in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees Muboshgu (submissions) in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's Ruby2010 (submissions) follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haikui

Hi there! well I'm from Manila and Haikui is very far to us. However, the storm's slow movement enhanced the southwest monsoon which also resulted to be a stationary monsoon. severe flooding already struck us because 472 millimeters of rain was already pour down here. Hope you could help us by simply praying. Thanks co - editor. we will survive this. stay strong! Jpuligan 12 (talk) 09:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

97/98 SPac

Could you create a fresh seasonal track map for 97-98 SPAC please.Jason Rees (talk) 22:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bertha (2008) Estimated Winds.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Bertha (2008) Estimated Winds.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:56, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

Excellent work at TY. Bolaven buddy..! Awesome!! Anirudh Emani (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second that! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2012 August newsletter

The final is upon us! We are down to our final 8. A massive 573 was our lowest qualifying score; this is higher than the 150 points needed last year and the 430 needed in 2010. Even in 2009, when points were acquired for mainspace edit count in addition to audited content, 417 points secured a place. That leaves this year's WikiCup, by one measure at least, our most competitive ever. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

Grapple X (submissions) once again finishes the round in first place, leading Pool B. Grapple X writes articles about television, and especially The X-Files and Millenium, with good articles making up the bulk of the score.
Miyagawa (submissions) led Pool A this round. Fourth-place finalist last year, Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, and has reached the final primarily off the back of his massive number of did you knows.
Ruby2010 (submissions) was second in Pool B. Ruby2010 writes primarily on television and film, and scores primarily from good articles.
Casliber (submissions) finished third in Pool B. Casliber is something of a WikiCup veteran, having finished sixth in 2011 and fourth in 2010. Casliber writes on the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. Over half of Casliber's points this round were bonus points from the high-importance articles he has worked on.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second in Pool A. Also writing on biology, especially marine biology, Cwmhiraeth received 390 points for one featured article (Bivalvia) and one good article (pelican), topping up with a large number of did you knows.
Muboshgu (submissions) was third in Pool A. Muboshgu writes primarily on baseball, and this round saw Muboshgu's first featured article, Derek Jeter, promoted on its fourth attempt at FAC.
Dana Boomer (submissions) was fourth in Pool A. She writes on a variety of topics, including horses, but this round also saw the high-importance lettuce reach featured article status.
Sasata (submissions) is another WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist in 2009 and 2010. He writes mostly on mycology.

However, we must also say goodbye to the eight who did not make the final, having fallen at the last hurdle: GreatOrangePumpkin (submissions), Ealdgyth (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions), Piotrus (submissions), Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), The Bushranger (submissions) and 1111tomica (submissions). We hope to see you all next year.

On the subject of next year, a discussion has been opened here. Come and have your say about the competition, and how you'd like it to run in the future. This brainstorming will go on for some time before more focused discussions/polls are opened. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bertha (2008) Estimated Winds.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Bertha (2008) Estimated Winds.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

Will you please restore the Jelawat article? It was a category 5 super typhoon(and every intense, for being below 910hpa) and caused 2 deaths and flooding in the Philippines? Not even including the future deaths or damages which it would cause later when it hits Taiwan, Okinawa, and Japan! -- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 04:58, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least, can you reply?-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 13:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Nadine Track

Could you please update the Hurricane Nadine track image? Last time I checked, it was five days old. –– Anonymouse321 (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating it! –– Anonymouse321 (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Coming in a hurry, did you know? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2012 September newsletter

We're over half way through the final, and so it is less than a month until we know for certain our 2012 WikiCup champion. Grapple X (submissions) currently leads, followed by Sasata (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and Casliber (submissions). However, we have no one resembling a breakaway leader, and so the competition is a long way from over. Next month's newsletter will feature a list of our winners (who are not necessarily only the finalists) and keep your eyes open for an article on the WikiCup in a future edition of The Signpost. The leaders are already on a par with last year's winners, but a long way from the huge scores seen in 2010. That said, a repeat of the competition from 2010 seems unlikely.

It is good to see that three-quarters of our finalists have already scored bonus points this round. This shows that, contrary to criticism that the WikiCup has received in the past, the competition does not merely incentivise the writing of trivial articles; instead, our top competitors are still spending their time contributing to high-importance articles, and bringing them to a high standard. This does a great service to the encyclopedia and its readers. Thank you, and good work!

The planning for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Some straw polls have been opened concerning the scoring, and you can now sign up for next year's competition. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on proposed Template talk:Infobox hurricane current changes

Hello, Cyclonebiskit. I am proposing a new version of the Template:Infobox hurricane current template, located in its sandbox. Would you like to comment on this change?

Thank you,

–– Anonymouse321 (talk) 17:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You received this message because you have contributed to tropical cyclone related articles and I thought you would be interested.

Tropical Storm Oscar track

Could you please create a track image for Tropical Storm Oscar so that it can be placed in the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season page?

Thank you, Anonymouse321 (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating and adding it! –– Anonymouse321 (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

san ciprian hurricane

Hi, i saw san ciprian hurricane that upgraded to category 4 but the track doesn´t appear to have reached this intensity. You can update san ciprian track? Khaled98 (talk) 22:01, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bob 01

If you need it: releifweb is carrying BOB 01 and as provided me with the link to the Bangladesh NDMO.Jason Rees (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes in October 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Midway, Mississippi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Names of North Indian Ocean Cyclones

The article 2012 North Indian Ocean cyclone season state under para on Storm Names "The next six names from the list of North Indian Ocean storm names are below:

where Murjan is mentioned. how can Murjan be in the next six list?Ugaap (talk) 18:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Barnstar

		The Tropical Cyclone Barnstar
		For your excellent contributions to Tropical cyclone-related articles. Thank you for creating several cyclone paths and editing pages! Keep up the great work! :) 24.136.205.68 (talk) 13:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Son-Tinh

Hi Cyclonebiskit, i'm inviting you to expand, an update the article, and adding the landfall time, which i had be finding it puzzling.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 13:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Sandy

Read your comment and agree with you but....I wish the editors would TOTALLY MOVE all NY and NJ to their respective separate pages and JUST leave a link on the main Hurricane Sandy to those pages. It's too confusing on where to put IMPACT the way it is now with TWO IMPACT areas for the same states. Do you agree? I am for the separate pages, but I'm jaded since I'm a New Yorker...:) Kennvido (talk) 06:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter

The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to Cwmhiraeth (submissions), our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009), Sturmvogel 66 (2010) and Hurricanehink (2011). Our final standings were as follows:

Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.

The featured article award goes to Grapple X (submissions), for four featured articles in the final round.
The good article award also goes to Grapple X (submissions), for 19 good articles in the second round.
The list award goes to Muboshgu (submissions), for three featured lists in the final round.
The topic award goes to Grapple X (submissions), for three good topics (with around 40 articles) in round 4.
The did you know award goes to Cwmhiraeth (submissions), for well over 100 DYKs in the final round.
The news award goes to ThaddeusB (submissions), for 10 in the news items in round 3.
The picture award goes to Grandiose (submissions), for two featured pictures in round 2.
The reviewer award goes to both Ruby2010 (submissions) (14 reviews in round 1) and Grandiose (submissions) (14 reviews in round 3).
Finally, for achieving an incredible bonus point total in the final round, and for bringing the top-importance article frog to featured status, a biostar has been awarded to Cwmhiraeth (submissions).

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Sandy's storm path

When are you going to update Hurricane Sandy's storm path? 24.136.205.68 (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions concerning non-tropical cyclones

Since you've been involved with articles on non-tropical cyclones in the past, I thought this might be a relevant area for you to give some input. At the moment, there is discussion going on about whether we should adopt The Weather Channel's new procedure of using names for winter storms that will have a significant impact. There are two discussions going on: an AFD of the article about the current winter storm season and a proposal to not use TWC's naming system as the title for an ongoing storm. Out of full disclosure, I've started both of those discussions, and while I have my own opinions, I wanted to get fresh opinions from editors who, like me, have a history of editing similar articles in the past. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sean 2012 Track

I can't seem to reason with Earth100 that the HURDAT version of the track is official and that the extra points the user added are nonexistent or they are from original research. Any suggestions? Supportstorm (talk) 03:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll issue a warning the next time he tries to revert it. Supportstorm (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Isaac (2012), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Culebra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bopha Track

Hi Cyclonebiskit, would you mind making the Bopha track bigger in size? Just look at Washi's path-one click, and you get full size image with more details.

Reasons for a bigger image:

Bigger image, in higher definition.
Allows viewers, when they want full size image to see up close of where it moved over exactly, and clearly.
You don't have to make it as big as Washi's track path image, maybe one third of Washi's track image size would do.
You can make the image bigger when Bopha dissipates completely .

Thank you for reading, please reply, thank you. ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ernesto

Thanks for that... I didn't even think to check the report. Sorry. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, do we typically indicate that a hurricane has been upgraded post-season in the article? Inks.LWC (talk) 05:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, yes. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 05:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Offhand can you think of a recent article where that happened? If I can see what we usually do, I'll do that for Ernesto now. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Track update please

Cyclonebiskit , mind if you update Maliksi's track map? Add the ET points from here:http://www.webcitation.org/6BimLVNHP

And also Ewiniar's track, add the points from here:http://www.webcitation.org/6BimLaTQ9

Jelawat's track add the points from here: http://www.webcitation.org/6BimLeMwx

And some other storms.

Thank You. --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For what you did in making Typhoon Bolaven (2012) a good article. You really deserve it. ✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 15:33, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 starting soon

Hi there; you're receiving this message because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup. This is just to remind you that the 2013 WikiCup will be starting on 1 January, and that signups will remain open throughout January. Old and new Wikipedians and WikiCup participants are warmly invited to take part in this year's competition. (Though, as a note to the more experienced participants, there have been a few small rules changes in the last few months.) If you have already signed up, let this be a reminder; you will receive a message with your submissions' page soon. Please direct any questions to the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! J Milburn 19:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012 Pacific typhoon season summary.png

Do you want to add Wukong to this? I can't do it without losing your extratropical extensions.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 12:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie and west Africa hurricanes

I noticed you're working on Debbie recently. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on what we should do here - List of West Africa hurricanes. Incidentally it is missing Debbie, but it includes many storms where the track happened to go near Cape Verde. What do you think? Should we only include storms where we have definitive impact and landfalls? Or should we include storms that passed nearby? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Debbie (1961), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosslare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Report

For some reason, I wasn't notified of this. The past few years at least I've been getting an e-mail when they release the report. If you readily have a link, might I see it just so I can look over it for my personal use? Thanks, and sorry for the confusion. gwickwire^talk_edits 22:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Hurricane Debbie (1961)

Hello! Your submission of Hurricane Debbie (1961) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 01:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone tracks

Do you happen to use Linux to make the cyclone tracks? Inks.LWC (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hurricane Debbie (1961)

On 21 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Debbie (1961), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hurricane Debbie in September 1961 produced record-breaking winds across parts of Ireland, gusting up to 114 mph (183 km/h) off the coast of Arranmore? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hurricane Debbie (1961). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

KTC (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoons tracks over Taiwan

Hello Cyclonebiskit,

I am an artist creating a sculpture based on Typhoon tracks passing over Taiwan. I have been looking at the file: Pacific Typhoon tracks 1980-2005.jpg. This is a beautiful image but has a little too much information for what I am trying to use it for. I want to create an image like this one but with far fewer tracks. What I am trying to find is someone who can give me individual tracks or a compilation of tracks that are both passing over Taiwan and near Taiwan from the years 2000 to 2013. Is this something you can create or can you put me in touch with someone who might be able to help me?

Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.8.7.217 (talk) 23:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter

Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader ( Grapple X (submissions)) had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. 12george1 (submissions) was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:

12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
Buggie111 (submissions) was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
Spencer (submissions) was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
Status (submissions) was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
Adam Cuerden (submissions) was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:

Ed! (submissions) was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
Hawkeye7 (submissions) has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
HueSatLum (submissions) claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of The C of E (submissions), who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Sandy

Did the $71 billion cost for Hurricane Sandy from the NCDC include clean-up/prevention costs or just solely the total for the damage caused? TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Audrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Albans, Vermont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
Sasata (submissions), whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
Muboshgu (submissions) and Wizardman (submissions), who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

U can haz cookie b/c ur page haz no cookie. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Tropical Storm Cecil (1989)/GA1

Hello Cyclonebiskit, I don't know if you are busy in real life or by accident haven't noticed, but a few days ago I reviewed Tropical Storm Cecil (1989). Just letting you know. Regards, --12george1 (talk) 02:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr ( Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare ( Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus ( Keilana (submissions) and Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John ( Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cyclone Namu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Log, Bellona, San Cristobal and Cocoa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Nora (1973), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Typhoon Karen

On 24 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Typhoon Karen, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the damage wrought by Typhoon Karen in Guam in 1962 was considered worse than that of the American liberation of the island in 1944? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Karen. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place Casliber (submissions) and second place Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 15:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TFA appearance of Hurricane Debbie (1961)

Hello, it looks as though the bot that does these things has omitted to tell you that Debbie will be the TFA in a few hours - Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 9, 2013. My apologies for the late selection and the late notice. Let me know if there are any problems. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 15:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tropical Storm Lucille

On 9 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tropical Storm Lucille, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Tropical Storm Lucille in 1960 was the first tropical cyclone in the Western Pacific to have its name retired? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tropical Storm Lucille. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

On 14 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season featured two tropical cyclones that struck East Pakistan three weeks apart, resulting in over 20,000 fatalities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Tornadoes of 2013

If you'll notice, there was no space. But, TAM did make a good point on his revert. So I will let it go. United States Man (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think about your idea. Nice going. Sorry that we've been giving each other headaches today. United States Man (talk) 23:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ITN credit

On May 16 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Mahasen, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

ThaddeusB (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Please source content

It was always my intention to source that once Norman released more information. I just took the track and filled in points based on what I saw there. It was actually not very much compared to what will be added once the complete path description is released. United States Man (talk) 16:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I wouldn't worry about credibility loss (all of what I added is true and is only waiting for a proper source), since the OKC news stations keep going over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and (well, you know what I mean). United States Man (talk) 16:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:May 17th TX tornadoes

I was actually just thinking about that because I was updating the tornado totals as well as updating the section for the May 15 outbreak. I was worried that it might cause confusion if we had two separate outbreak pages that both included May 17. I know that they were somewhat related, but (since we can't make the whole thing a sequence) I don't think they were enough involved with the system to have to be included. United States Man (talk) 18:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Tornado tables

I'm not going to argue, but all of these outbreak articles should be the same (that causes confusion). You are clearly going against the project policy (see here). If you want to push this, I suggest you start an RfC. United States Man (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Formatting

I take it that since you are changing thing in place, you mean to do the same in all other articles. I will help with that and let's see if we can get others to help on that as well. Maybe start with all the outbreak pages. Those lists can then be converted over to the monthly lists and all the other non-outbreak tornadoes can be fixed as well. And don't forget all that time consuming NCDC updating for years 2011 and earlier!!!! :) United States Man (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a few suggestions (if you don't mind my nitpicking). 1) The path width shouldn't be abbreviated. It should be just like the path length. 2) For tornadoes that last less than a minute, I think it would be better to just leave of the ending time (After all, it is the same as the beginning). 3) On the tornadoes with short path lengths that we don't know the certain length, the length should be left as "Unknown" instead of "Brief." United States Man (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cyclonebiskit. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

United States Man (talk) 02:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

I actually use Iowa Enviromental Mesonet to archive so that really doesn't affect me. :D But thanks anyway, United States Man (talk) 05:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the ones that I changed went to permanent survey/event pages. Which ones were you specifically talking about? United States Man (talk) 05:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think those are permanent. What I believe it means by first survey was that it was the first tornado surveyed. It has "second survey" for the Hannibal, MO tornado. If thay took the time to put up a map, I don't think they would overwrite it with something else. United States Man (talk) 05:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you were right. I looked at April 10 (the last time they did this) and the sources led me right to the May 20 survey. I found this though: [1]. Hannibal will need an archive. I will get it. United States Man (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes in May 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Florida, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for putting in those tireless, long hours for the last two weeks. United States Man (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:21, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again

work on cyclones
Thank you for covering cyclones, such as Waka, with depth and stormy dedication, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 148th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".

Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).

Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Claxton, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New tornado table

Is it possible that instead of having the state in a separate column, you put it like this: Adairsville, KY area; SW of El Reno, OK to W of Yukon, OK; SE of Watson, OK to NE of Cove, AR. Can it be that way or does it have to be the other way for sorting purposes. United States Man (talk) 00:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

^_^

[2] ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

If you don't mind, could you write a good "Meteorological synopsis" for June 12–13, 2013 derecho and tornado outbreak series. I know that you are good with those sections (and far better than I am). If you don't want to do it just let me know and I will get around to it, but I would rather you do it so it would be done right. Thanks, United States Man (talk) 17:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You try?

Wikipedia nor Commons is letting me upload the SPC High Risk images for May 22, 24, and 29, 2004. Perhaps it's just on my side though. Can you try? TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image problem?

Was there something wrong with the image that I overlooked? - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 23:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is here. I think what you saw was a cache problem. When new images get upload onto Commons, it takes a while for it to transfer on Wikipedia. Reloading your cache might fix this problem. - HurricaneSpin (Talk) 23:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

European tornadoes

Since France uses the EF-scale, wouldn't it make more sense to list it as EF- instead of F-? If any other countries use it too, the same would apply there. Should include a note saying why there are Fs and EFs on the page as well. What do you think about it? United States Man (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TemplateData is here

Hey Cyclonebiskit

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tropical cyclone effects in Europe

On 29 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tropical cyclone effects in Europe, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute predicts that by the year 2100, tropical cyclone effects in Europe will greatly increase, including storms similar to 2012 Hurricane Sandy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tropical cyclone effects in Europe. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 03:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Joplin tornado

Since you are the one who re-did the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes article, I thought it would be a good idea to ask you. A bit of information was added in this section (the ref is in there) about a survey team finding no evidence of EF5 damage. It should be noted, however, that NWS Springfield, MO (in the same ref) stated that the EF5 damage area was strong and may have easily been missed. Based on this, would you think that this tornado's entry on this page should "recieve a color" stating that it was possibly not an EF5? United States Man (talk) 03:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for the input. United States Man (talk) 03:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, Casliber (submissions) and Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 09:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yarnell Hill Fire

On 1 July 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yarnell Hill Fire, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Thanks for your work! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter

	WikiProject Amusement Parks Newsletter Quarter 3, 2013	463	124	5.13	50	30%	» Full edition
	WikiProject Amusement Parks Newsletter Quarter 3, 2013	Unassessed Articles	Coordinates Needed	WikiWork Load	Project Members	B&M articles are GA or FA	» Full edition

23:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoon Longwang may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

publisher=Japan Meteorological Agency|year=2006|accessdate=July 9, 2013|title=台風0519（0519 Longwang)|url=http://www.data.jma.go.jp/fcd/yoho/data/typhoon/T0519.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref>{{#tag:ref|The [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

There are four small things that need to be fixed - Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Longwang. Your expansion is impressive. SL93 (talk) 22:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Typhoon Longwang

On 14 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Typhoon Longwang, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Typhoon Longwang was the deadliest tropical cyclone to impact China during the 2005 Pacific typhoon season? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Longwang. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello cyclonebiskit, this is A professional representing Mike Morgan. I would caution you about the hazards of posting biased and/or incomplete potentially slanderous information on Wiki about Mike Morgan. RE: May 31 Tornadoes.

Please adivise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.242.182.179 (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Safety options when an official tornado emergency with a 300 mph, 2.6 mile wide F5 tornado warning in effect are NEVER "redundant". Safety options are arguably the most important part of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.110.121.110 (talk) 15:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Safety options

Safety options when an official tornado emergency with a 300 mph, 2.6 mile wide F5 tornado warning in effect are NEVER "redundant". Safety options are arguably the most important part of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.110.121.110 (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It IS a news article, as it was said on live TV. You are creating bias by omission of facts, and when it comes down to people in the path of this PARTICULAR tornado, that omission will not be tolerated. A shelter in place strategy for this PARTICULAR tornado would have likely resulted in the HIGHEST death and injury count. Site Josh Wurman, etal written studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.110.121.110 (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am a professional in OKC. Your omission of facts in this portion of the El Reno Tornado article is creating a slanderous bias against my client. Since Wiki is a free encyclopedia, edits on this topic can continue to be made by you and others we have documented, however be advised your edits, etal, are CREATING bias, whereas our edits are not, but rather are accurately depicting and documenting what was said. This is a very serious issue that goes FAR, FAR beyond Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.110.121.110 (talk) 17:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hey there, I'm SoapFan12, I thought I should asked, would you be interested on reviewing Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series, it is currently a FLC. SoapFan12 11:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Supportstorm revert

That was actually accidental. I was using a phone and accidentally touched the rollback button. I backed out of it quick and didn't realize it went through. United States Man (talk) 19:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Longwang

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Typhoon Longwang you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Longwang

The article Typhoon Longwang you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Longwang for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 19:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A lawsuit is now in final preparation concerning circumstances surrounding your complaint, not against Wikipedia, but rather against several contributors of four active Wikipedia pages and one deleted Wikipedia page. Cause: malice, slander thru omission and finally bias and intent to accomplish competitive advantage thru repeated practice of malice and bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.242.181.117 (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tropical Storm Flossie (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone map

Hi Cyclonebiskit, File:2012 Atlantic hurricane season summary map.png is a good piece of work. Would you consider adding a compass rose to the picture and nominating it at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates? --Pine^✉ 05:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Piotrus (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 18–21, 2013 tornado outbreak

Just a note that I have nominated this article for GA class. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOUR RFC

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback (Ks0stm)

Hello, Cyclonebiskit. You have new messages at Ks0stm's talk page.
Message added 19:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 19:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Piotrus (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), Dana boomer (submissions), Status (submissions), Ed! (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado

The article 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nudge. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Typhoon Cimaron (2006)/GA1

Cyclonebiskit, this nomination was reviewed back on August 7, but there hasn't yet been a response by you to it. In case you didn't notice before now—I don't think the bot posted to your talk page—you'll doubtless want to start work on it right away. Can you post your plans on the nomination page? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WPTC IRC

Just a nudge regarding the intensity forecasting competition since you've missed a few storms lately...Tropical Storm Humberto is closing at 5PM Eastern. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 19:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions for tornado outbreaks

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E) via User:Ks0awb} 22:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list.[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of tornadoes in the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak

	Featured Pioneer Barnstar
	For creating the first featured list using the tornado table format, which will serve as an example to others going forward, I award you the (just created) Featured Pioneer Barnstar. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page appearance: Tropical Storm Marco (2008)

This is a note to let the main editors of Tropical Storm Marco (2008) know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on October 6, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 6, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Tropical Storm Marco was the smallest tropical cyclone on record. The thirteenth named storm of the 2008 Atlantic hurricane season, Marco developed out of a broad area of low pressure over the northwestern Caribbean during late September 2008. Influenced by a tropical wave on October 4, a small low-level circulation center developed over Belize. After crossing the southern end of the Yucatán Peninsula, the low was declared Tropical Depression Thirteen early on October 6. The depression quickly intensified into a tropical storm (pictured) and was given the name Marco later that day. Marco reached its peak intensity with winds of 65 miles per hour (100 km/h) early on October 7. Around this time, tropical storm force winds extended 11.5 miles (18.5 km) from the center of the storm, making Marco the smallest known tropical cyclone on record. Around 1200 UTC, Marco made landfall near Misantla, Veracruz. The storm rapidly weakened after landfall, dissipating later that day. Because of its small size, Marco caused minimal damage. However, the storm's heavy rains led to floods up to 10 feet (3.0 m) deep that covered highways and damaged homes. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 September newsletter

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Sasata (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and Casliber (submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane tracks

Just a question- how do you make the hurricane track maps? I want to make some for my sandbox tests. ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 22:47, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cyclonebiskit. You have new messages at Talk:October_2013_Upper_Midwest_tornado.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jax 0677 (talk) 16:52, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Atlantic and East Pacific TC Tracks

Can you please update the individual tracks for ATl. TCs Tropical Storms Gabrielle (the last point) and Karen? And could you please also create a track for EPac Tropical Storm Narda? Thanks! LightandDark2000 (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please also create tracks for Tropical Storms Octave and Priscilla (2013 EPac basin)? Thanks! LightandDark2000 (talk) 06:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please create a track for Tropical Storm Lorenzo (and finish the individual tracks for TS Gabrielle and Karen)? Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 01:10, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

It may just be me, but do you think this version of List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes "jives" exactly with what this source says? United States Man (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Our final nine were as follows:

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:

Casliber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
Another Believer (submissions) wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
Hawkeye7 (submissions) wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
Ed! (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to The C of E (submissions), for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
Finally, the judges are awarding Cwmhiraeth (submissions) the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Typhoon Haiyan (2013)

On 8 November 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Typhoon Haiyan (2013), which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 17:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Haiyan (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Outflow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Haiyan

I think it better to give each country affected a separate section. Taiwan, Vietnam and China are stubby atm, but capable of expansion. Turning in now (midnight UK time) will give article another look in the morning. Mjroots (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon errors

Could you please be more specific about the places on the JTWC server where you think that the information supporting the claims is localized? The archive only goes to 2012, doesn't it? The warning legend contains one picture only and it has none of the claimed figures in it. --Lumidek (talk) 07:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dependent territories

It looks like you don't understand the status of Hong Kong, and of dependencies in general. [3] 119.237.249.221 (talk) 20:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorological history of Typhoon Haiyan

You may be able to use my old sandbox for the meteorological history article. Might be some useful things in there that are not in the present article. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Typhoon Haiyan page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bolding removal

We don't have any consensus on this. Death tolls have always been bolded on tornado tables, and lets keep it that way until we have further agreement(it makes the page easier to read as well). 184.58.26.140 (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Sharkguy05[reply]

Bolding

The bolding on these tables is really not a big issue. It really could fall under WP:IAR. The bolding on the ratings helps it be seen easily and since deaths from tornadoes stand out, the bolding of the deaths wouldn't go completely against MoS (if I'm interpreting correctly). I don't think members of this project would support that anyway. United States Man (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just answer this question: Without MoS, do you really support the bolding? I think this would just fly under the radar if there isn't a big fuss. The bolding isn't a big deal, and since most of us support bolding, we can just save the "correct" way for FAC/FLC. United States Man (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited November 17, 2013 tornado outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roseburg, Indiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks

I'm not convinced it wasn't part of a pattern. Dougweller (talk) 19:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cyclonebiskit. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 21:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dougweller (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Death Toll on Haiyan vs Thelma

I saw your edit just today. Thelma might have killed 8,000 people (including missing presumed dead), but I did indicate that the confirmed count is 5,081. Meanwhile, as of posting time Haiyan has confirmed toll of 5,209. However, that is not yet the final count, not all towns have been penetrated yet. Chitetskoy (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Man made haiyan

You explained it not enoughed. what is the point to remove conspiracy theories here in wikipedia. you just said that they have no place here .. first of all i have a reference and used the words allegedly and others.. second, there are many conspiracy theories in wikipedia like pope john paul i's death... third please give me the part of the wikipedia's rules stating they do not allowed them. -PapaJeckloy (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy in Typhoon Haiyan

Hello, i appreciated your concern but i stated that it is alleged and i have reference. Also there are conspiracy theories here in wikipedia like Pope John Paul I's death. I think you are doing this because you are an american and you dont want your country to be ashamed. Am i right? PapaJeckloy (talk) 11:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be rude. If you don't like his edit, don't get angry and reply saying:

I think you are doing this because you are an american and you dont want your country to be ashamed. Am i right?

Talk about it in a respectful manner, not make an argument saying that if <person> is a/an <demonym>, then he does <action> because <person> doesn't want to be ashamed of his/her's <noun/action> ..ItsPaide.. 03:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Atlantic Tracks

Hey there. It appears that you are able to find data on storm tracks and generate them for both NAtl and EPac hurricanes. Can you please update the summary track for the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season? It's outdated. Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 01:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Track map/Commons upload request

Hey CB,

I was wondering if you'd mind creating a track map for the 1804 snow hurricane? Due to outstanding issues at Commons, I can't upload it myself, so I was hoping you'd be able to recreate it.
For the track, I ran ./track --input ../data/1804SNOW.txt --bg ../data/bg8192.png --output ../png/Snow_1804_track.png --name snow while in the tracks/ directory. Here's the content of the 1804SNOW.txt file:

00005 10/09/1804 M= 3  1 SNBR=   0 SNOW   XING=0 SSS=0
00010 10/09*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*3700757  65    0*3830753  65    0*
00015 10/10*3970748  65    0*4080741  65    0*4170728  75    0*4230713  95    0*
00020 10/11*4290697  80    0*4330679  65    0*4370660  50    0*4400640  50    0*

Thanks in advance,
Cloudchased (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This was the source of the track data, it was derived from this study. Are unofficial tracks permitted? :/ Cloudchased (talk) 02:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Atlantic hurricane season

The seasonal summary track is out of date, so could you please update it? Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested third-party response

Hey, I see that you appear to be on a Wikibreak (I really don't blame you, you've been very active for several months). Anyway, when you get back, TAWX13 and myself have been in a discussion about the things that were changed in this edit. As I have always put the publisher of an IEM NWS text archive as "National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration" and no one has ever said anything, I didn't see any harm in changing it here. Also, I removed the authors from the NCDC entry refs (which were local NWS offices), because there is no evidence that the NCDC gives that identifies an author of those reports (and even if it is the NWS offices that give them information, I told TAWX that it would be like be giving him information to write a book but him writing the book himself–which makes him/NCDC, not me/NWS, the author). TAWX has disagreed with that edit and are discussion has gotten nowhere (with him not explaining what I asked and, after I asked again, telling me that he has already explained). Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, United States Man (talk) 23:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Rees gave me this, which solves the problem about the NCDC (TAWX was right, but he just wasn't providing me with evidence). However, I would still like you input on the IEM issue. United States Man (talk) 23:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on changes to the format of the tornado table

Due to your membership in [[WikiProject Severe weather, I thought that the discussion going on there regarding proposed changes to the tornado table might interest you. If you are interested in participating in discussion, please feel free to join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather#Reference column in the tornado table. All views are welcome, and please do not feel obligated to participate if you are not interested. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

12george1 (submissions) and TropicalAnalystwx13 (submissions) were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
Sven Manguard (submissions) scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
WonderBoy1998 (submissions) scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Wikipedia:Featured topics/She Wolf.
TheAustinMan (submissions) scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
Igordebraga (submissions) has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TY Tina 1997.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyclone Alessia (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cockatoo Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

Hahc21 (submissions), who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
Prism (submissions), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Alessia (2013)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Alessia (2013) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Alessia (2013)

The article Cyclone Alessia (2013) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyclone Alessia (2013) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyclone Hellen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tropical Storm Helen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1947 Fort Lauderdale hurricane

I have noticed that the latest version of HURDAT has made some additional changes to the Best Track positions and/or intensities for Storm #4, 1947, from 00 UTC 18 September through 00 UTC 19 September. You will note that the positions were changed and a 970-mb pressure was added at 06 UTC 18 September. Please try to upload a new track image for this storm. Thanks! CapeVerdeWave (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Tropical Cyclone Barnstar
		For your excellent contributions to Tropical cyclone-related articles and your continuing track work. Keep up the good work! LightandDark2000 (talk) 08:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyclone Rusty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tables

Where in MOS does in say that. I'm just curious. The damage totals were decided on here (I can't help that you missed it). Don't go changing things that the project has agreed on. United States Man (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a bad interpretation of it. These aren't necessarily the same lists. They are different lists for different days. Though I suppose a counter argument to that would be that the title is misleading (on "list" pages). United States Man (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

outbreak

Given your interest, you may want to comment here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#.5BReady.5D_April_27.E2.80.9328.2C_2014_tornado_outbreak μηδείς (talk) 03:05, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have also named you as the article's chief updater. μηδείς (talk) 03:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITN credit

On April 30 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article April 27–29, 2014 tornado outbreak, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

ThaddeusB (talk) 17:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Czar (submissions) and Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited April 2014 North Carolina tornado outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Hermon, North Carolina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Mala

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Mala you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 19:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado outbreak mapping

Hello Cyclonebiskit! Over on the tropical cyclone WikiProject IRC User:TropicalAnalystwx13 had requested potential maps of tornado outbreaks similar to the storm path maps made for tropical cyclones. Since you made the plot map template for the April 27–30, 2014 tornado outbreak, I thought you might've been interested at the map I was able to produce using QGIS software, which could potentially be used on a larger scale for tornado outbreak articles, and I was wondering if you might have any comments on it. 16:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cyclone Mala may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

mid- to late-April, a pulse in the [[Madden–Julian oscillation]], coupled with a [[Kelvin wave]], (which later contributed to the formation of [[Typhoon Chanchu]] in the [[2006 Pacific typhoon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2006 North Indian Ocean cyclone season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

September, while the average is {{convert|993.9|mm|in|abbr=on}}. In addition, five sub-division (the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, [[Arunachal Pradesh]], [[Assam]] and [[Meghalaya]], west [[Uttar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Mala

The article Cyclone Mala you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyclone Mala for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 05:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1964 Rameswaram cyclone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on National Weather Service Norman, Oklahoma

I hate to bring this up, but I don't care if the content you removed from National Weather Service Norman, Oklahoma was relevant or not; the edit summary you left was, in my opinion, inaccurate, and, more importantly, was really insulting to me. You shouldn't just remove everything that makes the office unique; how's it different from every other office then? I will admit that I could easily be wrong here; undoubtedly, some of that information was in fact irrelevant or excessive, but instead of actually doing anything to help the article, you have done nothing more than strip it down. I know that you have made some great contributions to the wiki, but that edit summary was kind of like a slap to the face. If the content you removed was entirely non-unique and useless, then your edit summary might have been a bit more justified, but that was most certainly not the case. I'm not going to call you lazy or insult you (I don't think you're lazy, that's not what I am implying), but I am going to say that you could have done better. I've dealt with enough of this sort of gesture. Through all of this, I am trying to remain as civil as possible, but if you are going to say that you don't like the article as is, make more of it than simply stripping it down. There are other areas of the office's history which I would far rather expand upon, but I would likely be heavily restricted in terms of finding non-primary sources. I hate WP:PRIMARY enough; that's one of the reasons I been dealing with many problems from some editors. That's part of what forced me to userfy the page, which in turn is part of the reason for which next to no editors aside from myself have edited the article. No one wants to edits a user space draft apart from the relevant user. That's why I have received little input on the article. In any case, please just be kinder in the future; I intend no offense here, and I will admit that there were and are problems with the article, but please do not just go around removing cited content without also helping to build as well. Please don't take any offense or think me "foolish" or something (I don't know what you will think when you read this) like some editors would. I don't want this to be some sort of major issue in the future; I just really don't want this to happen again. Please take all of this to mind. Sorry if what I have written here is excessive, but I felt that I had a lot to say to you; thank you. Dustin (talk) 05:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Forrest (1992)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Forrest (1992) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC designation

I know there is no need to describe a JTWC designation in the lead of notable storms such as Typhoon Haiyan. However, Tropical Depression Wilma (2013) is not that notable and was under at least three designations due to crossing many seas. Thus, adding 30W in the leading introduction may be necessary for people to understand quickly. How do you think? -- Meow 01:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baleswar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Forrest (1992)

The article Cyclone Forrest (1992) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyclone Forrest (1992) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes in June 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buena Vista, Ohio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again

work on cyclones
Thank you for covering cyclones, such as Waka, with depth and stormy dedication, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 148th recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Abby (1964)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Storm Abby (1964) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 03:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Abby (1964)

The article Tropical Storm Abby (1964) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Abby (1964) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 23:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Ophelia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Truk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 June newsletter

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to 12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Ophelia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Ophelia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Rita (1972), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cirrus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoon Saomai may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

publisher=Japan Meteorological Agency|year=2006|accessdate=July 2, 2014|title=台風0608号（0608 Saomai)|url=http://www.data.jma.go.jp/fcd/yoho/data/typhoon/T0608.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref> The JTWC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Christina (2014) track update

Hey, there. I noticed that you were generating most of the tracks for the Atlantic and East Pacific storms, so I want to thank you for your work. However, I noticed that Hurricane Christine's individual track wasis sing some post-tropical points that were present in the seasonal summary track. So can you please give Hurricane Christine's track an update? Thanks. 72.197.234.162 (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Ophelia

The article Typhoon Ophelia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Ophelia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Typhoon Ophelia

On 8 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Typhoon Ophelia, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1960 Typhoon Ophelia had devastating impacts on the small atoll of Ulithi in the Caroline Islands? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Ophelia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 11:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Saomai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rota. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please create File:Fausto 2014 track.png?

I hate to ask, but you seem to be the main editor for the storm tracks on 2014 Pacific hurricane season, and I personally don't have experience making maps myself, so I thought you would be the best one to ask. Dustin (talk) 23:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Pacific typhoon season summary map

Hi, there Cyclonebiskit. You are one of the members who make/edit tracks of storms, right? Can you update the 2014 Pacific typhoon season summary map, since Keith Edkins hasn't fixed it. Because Mitag's track there is old, there is another version of it now. The other one is that Hagibis' track is not really complete. I just left this message, because I am also crazy about storm tracks. Thanks Typhoon2013 (talk) 00:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tracking maps

Hey Cyclonebiskit,

I see that you know how to make track maps using the wikipedia project. However do you possibly know how to make the maps using GIMP? I kinda interested in how to make them.

Regards

Sutowe12 (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tracking maps

Thanks for the help. I have a question though. If I were to make a track map, how can I get the image of the world to a size that I want it at or the picture of the world at a certain place (eg. US East Coast) that I can work with to make the track?

Sutowe12 (talk) 01:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoons

I know that we usually don't apply numbers to hurricanes: for example, we usually don't call Hurricane Irene in 2011 "1109".

But numbers are used not only in Japan but in China, Korea, Vietnam, etc. Please look at Digital Typhoon: Typhoon Names (Asian Names).

Annual Report on Activities is an official report by RSMC Tokyo - Typhoon Center. Typhoon numbers are used in this official report.

Therefore, I think information of typhoon numbers is necessary for INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA (Wikipedia).--HERB (talk) 13:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at RSMC TROPICAL CYCLONE BEST TRACK. If typhoon number is really useless, there is no information of typhoon number in best track. So please don't remove typhoon numbers from typhoon articles.--HERB (talk) 14:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Effects of Typhoon Bopha in Micronesia and Palau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuuk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hurricane Arthur (2014)

On 29 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Arthur (2014), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that no other hurricane has struck North Carolina as early in the calendar year as did Hurricane Arthur? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hurricane Arthur (2014). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 02:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

1976 Canary Island UFO Article on AFD

Please join the discussion about the fate of this article.98.174.223.41 (talk) 20:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Track map for Tropical Storm Genevieve

Would you please update File:Genevieve 2014 track.png to account for its activity through July 31? Thank you. Dustin (talk) 19:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war on live templates

If you don't understand the changes, I'll explain them, but these changes were to address requests from Template talk:Infobox tornado, and you're breaking any instances where people have taken these updates into account. Please revert yourself and explain your complaints or ask me questions. -- Netoholic @ 03:19, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Netoholic: Actually, you need to stop your edit warring. User:Secret just warned you of this. Cyclonebiskit was in the right, as there was no community consensus. United States Man (talk) 03:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:EDITCONSENSUS and WP:BOLD, permission for edits is not required, and all that is required to indicate consensus is to let good edits stand. -- Netoholic @ 03:27, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Bypassing consensus on widely used templates is a cop-out excuse. You can link as many guideline pages as you want, but making changes without discussion on highly visible templates is not considered appropriate by many. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - 67 transclusions] of Template:Infobox tornado is hardly "highly visible", and you've resorted to edit warring rather than discussing on the talk page. -- Netoholic @ 03:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - Enough with the accusations. There is something called bold, revert, discuss, and that should be applied. Netoholic makes edits, if he is disagreed with, a revert is applied, then further discussion follows for a while. If a true consensus is reached by multiple editors, then the same would apply for re-removing the additions. Dustin (talk) 03:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - Is no one going to listen to me? Dustin (talk) 03:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(moved from my talk, reply here please) Same issues as with the hurricane templates. You've gone ahead and made numerous changes without informing anyone beforehand. The Severe Project is nowhere near as active, however, and it's best to ping editors when you're making said changes. The changes to color is my biggest complaint here, however, and is the exact same reason you've been reverted by WP:WPTC. You're being excessively stingy with the "rules" for something that already complies with guidelines. There's no need to change the colors when they meet necessary standards. Trying my best not to be rude here, but I'm honestly infuriated by your endless attempts to change things that don't need fixing. So my apologies if I've come off as aggressive/offensive. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:26, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am offended, and so should the people that requested these changes on Template talk:Infobox tornado. The colors, in particular, are requested by TornadoLGS at Template_talk:Infobox_tornado#Colors. You should discuss your issues with there... the colors have been live do several days now. -- Netoholic @ 03:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Cyclonebiskit, you can take Netoholic to the edit-warring noticeboard if you want (look at the talk history), but I am going to bed. United States Man (talk) 03:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - As there are no 3RR violations, I would advise against that. Dustin (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'd much rather discuss than do something like that, USM.... Anyways, between my job and getting ready to move, I'm not always paying attention to everything that's going on between the two projects in question here. What I have seen was numerous abrupt changes to style and color without prior discussion. I'm not talking about the addition of a color bar to the template, I'm talking about the change in color from the original ones utilized in the storm colors template. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - So you're reverting an unrelated tornado template to, what, "get back" at me or something? -- Netoholic @ 03:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm not, I'm following the same line of logic behind why your changes to the storm colors on WPTC were reverted. There's no need for it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        So you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater then? I made several updates/improvements to that template, more than just the colors, and you reverted those right along with everything else. -- Netoholic @ 03:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        @Netoholic: - Do you realize how disruptive you are being with your edits though? Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 16:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Pacific hurricane season

Hurricane Genevieve is a category 5, not a 4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.208.15 (talk) 17:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not in the EPAC. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 17:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear the site hasn't been kind to you...

...we've all been through the same. I don't know the specifics of the problem, but no matter what happens, being such a big contributor to the encyclopedia, I hope that you'll still stick around to some extent, and make sure that "semi-retired" doesn't become a "retired"! You are obviously free to leave if you want to, but I just thought I would say that. Dustin (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah man. It sucks it's been a stressful few weeks here. Sorry to hear you're semi-retired. If you need me to look over any of your articles, you know where I'll be :) Your articles are too get to let some vandal take advantage of :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hurricane Bertha (2014)

added links pointing to St. Thomas, Culebra, Cat Island and Crooked Island

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Pacific hurricane season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newspapers.com

You received a Wikipedia email about access to Newspapers.com about 2.5 weeks ago about access to WP:Newspapers.com access through the The Wikipedia Library. We currently don't have record of your response on the Google doc. Please make sure to follow the instructions in that email for obtaining access, Sadads (talk) 16:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Handle systems with one LPA stage between two TD stages

Please read Talk:2014 Pacific typhoon season before reverting everything. I also never provided original research, so you were insulting me. -- Meow 03:19, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 August newsletter

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
Casliber (submissions) is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
Czar (submissions) was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
12george1 (submissions) is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
Sturmvogel 66 (submissions), the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
Bloom6132 (submissions), the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Matty.007 (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), WikiRedactor (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), Yellow Evan (submissions), Prism (submissions) and Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Uleki

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurricane Uleki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Marie (2014), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Army Corps of Engineers and Santa Catalina Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Uleki

The article Hurricane Uleki you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hurricane Uleki for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kalmaegi article

Hello, Cyclonebiskit, I've never talked to you for a while now, hehe. Just saying, I understand why you merged the article of Kalmaegi, even though I created it. But I was about to put some information but you removed it. Is it OK that you should put it back and I'll ad the information since I am using an iPad and it is different when you are using the Wikipedia. Typhoon2013 (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Rita(1972)

Hello. I'm from Beijing and know much about this typhoon, especially for its structure after 26th and its impact to China. So I added some content to this topic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_Rita_%281972%29 In the discussion, I am wondering that as the Japan Meteorological Agency's best track only represent the opinion of one institution, while Joint Typhoon Warning Center and China Meteorological Agency all judged it as a tropical cyclone, why the preview edition only showed the JMA's idea? JMA became the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center at 1980s, so it is not the authority in the 1970s. More evidence including initial radiosonde datasets and radar image of Beijing and north China seemed to show that Rita was still a tropical cyclone(for well-defined LLCC and convection, the warm core, the vertical structure, etc). Thank you very much for your discussion.BeijingCup (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Beulah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Vincent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 September newsletter

In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Godot13 (submissions) has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Cwmhiraeth (submissions) is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Casliber (submissions), who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.

Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Odile track update

Hello. Since most of the post-tropical points seem to be missing from the track map, can you please update the track based on the coordinates provided from the bulletins 1 and 2? Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 05:39, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please also apply the update to the Odile's individual track. It appears that no one has touched that one for some time. Thanks.

LightandDark2000 (talk) 01:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Agnes (1981)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Agnes (1981) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Agnes (1981)

The article Typhoon Agnes (1981) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Agnes (1981) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Featured Article: Notification

This is to inform you that Tropical Storm Kiko (2007), which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Wikipedia Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 15 October 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 23:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

The inclusion of an image in your signature violates WP:SIGIMAGE. Please remove it. Thanks. Seattle (talk) 02:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of December 2009 Interstate 10 pileup

The article December 2009 Interstate 10 pileup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOT#NEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 01:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014: The results

The 2014 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions), who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Casliber (submissions), WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:

Godot13 (submissions) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 181 featured pictures in the final round.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 65 did you knows in the final round.
Casliber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for four featured articles in the final round.
Czar (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
Sturmvogel 66 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
Bloom6132 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
12george1 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
ChrisGualtieri (submissions) wins the GA prize for 27 good articles in round 2 and the review prize for 28 good article reviews in round 1.
Caponer (submissions) wins the FL prize for three featured lists in round 2.
Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize his work on featured portals.
Figureskatingfan (submissions) wins the topic prize for a nine-article featured topic in round 3.
ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for 28 in the news articles in round 3.

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific tracking data

I see you have recently extended some of the tracks on the 2014 season summary - can you add the data to Talk:2014 Pacific typhoon season/Tracks so I can pick it up and not inadvertently revert your work!--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 11:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Typhoon Karen/archive1

Hi Cyclonebiskit, you're the nom for this one. I don't know if it fell off your watchlist, but you haven't responded to questions since you opened the nomination. Nevertheless, it seems to be on track, with two supports and one oppose so far. I see two items in particular that need your attention: "There is some error ("chapter=ignored") in the References section.", and "All were fixed except possibly the one about "wind gusts"." - Dank (push to talk) 21:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2015 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.

We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Typhoon Utor (2006)/GA1

Cyclonebiskit, you opened this review on November 29, indicating that you'd be posting the actual review that evening, but have not come back to it. Please let me know if you think you won't be able to do it. I can arrange to have it put back into the reviewing pool, but I hope that the review has simply been delayed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do we still need it?

Cyclonebiskit, I was just wondering that why do we still need to say what category is it two times in the timeline? It's because I've seen that in the timeline there are keys at the bottom (which represents the color of the category) in the recent hurricane seasons, they also put the categories beside the names. Example: Amanda (C4), Dolly (TS), Ana (C1). Why do we still need it since there is a color code at the bottom? It's hard to explain but I hope you reply back since anon users are not agreeing with me. :( Typhoon2013 (talk) 18:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks. Ok, I get it now. Typhoon2013 (talk) 18:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

04F Image

Oh yeah, thanks. I actually just noticed it a couple of minutes ago. Yep I'll change it as soon as I can. Have a good day and a Merry Christmas. :) Typhoon2013 (talk) 02:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of info in Tornadoes of 2014

Hi Cyclonebiskit, I want to know the reason why some of the content on the following page was removed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tornadoes_of_2014&diff=639410459&oldid=639405702

I added this along with validated sources.

Regards, Tushar TUKAKKAR (talk) 07:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Marie (2014)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurricane Marie (2014) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The review was completed over three weeks ago, and is awaiting action. Please be sure to stop by the review when you return to see what's needed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Marie (2014)

The article Hurricane Marie (2014) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hurricane Marie (2014) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 17:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOUR query

Greetings Cyclonebiskit, I saw that you are a WP:FOUR reviewer, so I would like to ask whether Wrestle Kingdom 9 could potentially qualify. While it's a redirect now, there's already some content written in as a sub-section of a list article. So would it not count as a new article? starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 10:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

Cwmhiraeth (submissions) took Bumblebee, a level-4 vital article, to Good Article;
AHeneen (submissions) worked-up the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 article, also to Good Article status;
Rodw (submissions) developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking Magna Carta there some 800 years after it was first sealed;
And last but not least, Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) worked up a number of Featured Pictures during round 1, including the 1948 one Deutsche Mark (pictured right), receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in.

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

Cwmhiraeth (submissions) took Bumblebee, a level-4 vital article, to Good Article;
AHeneen (submissions) worked-up the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 article, also to Good Article status;
Rodw (submissions) developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking Magna Carta there some 800 years after it was first sealed;
And last but not least, Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) worked up a number of Featured Pictures during round 1, including the 1948 one Deutsche Mark (pictured right), receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in.

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2002 season effects?

I removed the section because I was fixing it. I uploaded it back again with new stuff. Just saying because put a summary of it in the "View history" button. Thanks and I hope you like the new table :). Typhoon2013 (talk) 23:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]