User talk:Comingdeer

This user is interested in the U.S. State of Mississippi.

Welcome from a former Mississippian

Hello, Comingdeer and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Orange Mike | Talk 17:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chokwe Lumumba.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TheOneSean ^{[ U | T | C ]} 14:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission David Shattuck

Hello Comingdeer. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled David Shattuck.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Shattuck}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruth Bader Ginsburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flatbush. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

angels and Jesus

Please join us on the Jesus talk page to discuss how to cover angels in the Gospels. Thanks. Jonathan Tweet (talk) 14:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated soapboxing

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Jesus, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 13:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greenwood, Mississippi

On the Greenwood, Mississippi article, you added here that John Williams "arrived by flatboat". The citation at the end of the sentence was for page 7 of this book. I wasn't able to find any mention of a flatboat. Where did you get this information? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Webster's guidebook on Miss. genealogy here has a reference to my source on John Williams. Hamilton says on page 41 "The first settlement at G'wood was made by a flat-boat man named Williams, who built a shanty on the bank and for a time exposed his wares for sale. Richard McConnell was among the first merchants and he had interests at Carrollton...In a few years Dr. McLean, Allen McCaskill et al bought lands and their success influence others to join them in subduing the forests". Here are three map references for the road connection to Carrollton:

Johnson's Arkansas, Mississippi and Louisiana Author: A J Johnson; Johnson & Browning.; David Rumsey Collection.; Cartography Associates. Publisher: [1860] http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/view/search?q=+List_No%3D%272905.020%27%22%20LIMIT:RUMSEY~8~1&sort=Pub_Date,Pub_List_No_InitialSort

Henry Schenk Tanner: Louisiana and Mississippi By H. S. Tanner, 1838. http://www.raremaps.com/gallery/detail/35526mb/Louisiana_and_Mississippi_By_H_S_Tanner_1838/Tanner.html

Title Louisiana and Mississippi Subject Railroads--Louisiana--Maps; Canals--Louisiana--Maps; Railroads--Mississippi--Maps; Canals--Mississippi--Maps; Louisiana--Maps; Mississippi--Maps Description Prime meridians: Washington and Greenwich.; Relief shown pictorially.; In bottom center margin: Engraved & Published by H.S. Tanner, Philadelphia; Map extends into surrounding areas.; Includes notes about soil conditions, flooding, etc.; Attached to original binder. Creator Tanner, Henry Schenck, 1786-1858. Publisher H.S. Tanner Date 1845 http://cdm16044.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15099coll3/id/452

I have a special interest in flatboats as many Miss. settlers came via flatboat. I spent my childhood near Greenville at Leland. See my flatboat bibliography I researched at WorldCat here.Church of the Rain (talk) 04:11, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page 41 of the source you added above here is not available. Please do not make additional unsourced edits. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The source is available at these libraries. Probably the material is available at the Family Research Center of the Latter Day Saints in Salt Lake and the Library of Congress in ::Washington, DC.

History of Carroll County, Mississippi

Author: William Franklin Hamilton

Publisher: Place of publication not identified : publisher not identified, 19--?]

Edition/Format: Print book : English

Database: WorldCat

Subjects

Carroll County (Miss.) -- History.

Mississippi -- Carroll County.

Enter your location: 39206

 Find libraries

Displaying libraries 1-4 out of 4 Show libraries holding just this edition Library Held formats Distance 1. Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39762 United States Book Book 110 miles MAP IT Library info Ask a librarian Add to favorites 2. Tombigbee Reg Library West Point, MS 39773 United States Book Book 121 miles MAP IT Library info Add to favorites 3. Fort Worth Library Fort Worth, TX 76102 United States Book Book 418 miles MAP IT Library info Add to favorites 4. Texas State Library & Archives Commission Austin, TX 78701 United States Book Book 470 miles MAP IT Library info Add to favorites Toggle expanding/contracting information section Details Genre/Form: History Document Type: Book All Authors / Contributors: William Franklin Hamilton Find more information about: Go OCLC Number: 4995867 Notes: Includes index. Originally published in the Carroll County conservative. Reproduction Notes: Photocopy. Description: 98 leaves ; 28 cm Responsibility: by William Franklin Hamilton ; [surname index by Eileen Eighmy Sandlin

The guidebook that also names the Hamilton book was written by the Anne Webster, former librarian at Miss. Dept. of Archives and History, in Jackson. Its available there. See ::below:

History of Carroll County, Mississippi /

by Hamilton, William F. (William Frank); Conservative Print (Carrollton, Miss.).

Material type: materialTypeLabelBook

Publisher: Carrollton, Miss. : The Conservative Print, 19--]

Description: 98 leaves ; 28 cm.

Uniform titles: Carroll County conservative.

Subject(s): Carroll County (Miss.) -- History | Carroll County (Miss.) | Mississippi authors

Holdings ( 2 )Title notes

Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due

Archive Request

Archival Reading Room

General OS/976.263/C23ha Available In-House Only

Archive Request

Archival Reading Room

General OS/976.263/C23ha/index Available In-House Only

Church of the Rain (talk) 00:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I've just reverted a bunch of your edits. I'm not sure why you are adding barely referenced text, or photos that have little to do with articles, but it's really messing up a lot of articles. Please stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to talk about your objections on the article's talk page and we can discuss the sources merits or my reasons for adding material. Church of the Rain (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

Hi! I want to let you know that I reverted your recent edit to "Jesus" since the citation needed tag rather contradicted the Featured Article icon and status of the article. Feel free to put those appreciable good info of yours back after you provide the necessary source. (I'm afraid my edit summary said all this in a far harsher language than I really meant, I sorry, sorry for that) Cheers, and Happy Editing!Gonzales John (talk) 19:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Mississippi

Hello! As a past or current member of WikiProject Mississippi, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about Mississippi, you are cordially invited to edit, assess, and improve our coverage of all things Mississippi on Wikipedia!

JonathanTheLibrarian (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rob Joyce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bolton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the COVID-19 timeline for November-December

Hi there! I was just laying last hands on a rephrase of the timeline for November/December last year, when I noticed your contribution. This, about the very recent newspaper talk about a first case in France 27 December. You are most welcome to have a look at the talk page and, very very soon, also a fresh article view. My wish is that the academic approach should prevail, and that is not easy, firstly because I'm not an academic myself, but also because there are many newspaper sources in the article. It's really a matter of judgment. I think the information that comes from France these days should be recognised as scientific in nature, and best given on, not through newspaper articles, but through academic articles. I have found the published paper that speaks of the information (doi link) but it does not make me any wiser, and my subjective approach is to shy away from letting the article be a frontline for first published controversial reports.

Otherwise I see no problem, ie. that the case is from France. It is a textwise bewildering contribution, and should therefore be given some context, which is not impossible. But, from the above reasons, I do not include the new information in the rephrased edition. I still find it is undue. Sechinsic (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 06:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blockchain and cryptocurrency general sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Retimuko (talk) 18:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Wikipedians of Jewish descent has been nominated for discussion

Category:American Wikipedians of Jewish descent has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shield AI has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shield AI. Thanks! JSFarman (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. This Wired article has a ton of information. Definitely more that can be included in the article! I've worked on it a bit, but I really don't know enough about the military and drones etc to help too much. Still...what a cool company! Thanks for introducing me to them. JSFarman (talk) 03:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Passover!

Happy Passover!

Hello Comingdeer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this passover. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a happy passover or easter, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Happy editing,
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Be blessed with the favor of Yeshua Church of the Rain (talk) 01:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Happy Passover}} to other user talk pages.

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shield AI (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Read: WP:NPOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shield AI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shield AI, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone just edited the draft. Not directed at you. JSFarman (talk) 22:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comingdeer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians interested in legal doctrines and principles has been nominated for merging

Category:Wikipedians interested in legal doctrines and principles has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The subject"

This is a really weird way to write. I have never seen this sort of stilted language on Wikipedia before. Please revise your edits to use their last names or a simple He or She. Reywas92^Talk 01:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The subject means the subject of the article. See [1]https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/subject Church of the Rain (talk) 02:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not stupid, I know what the word means, I'm saying that's poor writing and you should write like a normal person with the the last name or a pronoun as the sentence's subject rather than this unusual way. Reywas92^Talk 22:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing in English and if you understand the meaning and others do too... that should be enough. I don't think style really matters if it maintains clarity and readability. Loosen up some. Church of the Rain (talk) 02:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My teachers of writing said not to use the same sentence structure, but utilize short sentences, compound, clauses, & c to add variety and interestingness Church of the Rain (talk) 02:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further explanation is 'the subject' is the most important thing to say as they have a Wikipedia entry. They are a notable, not that are of a gender, of a surname, or have a title. I can accommodate you if it is too formal or weird, but sometimes 'the subject' is fitting. Church of the Rain (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has absolutely nothing to do with sentence structure. This weird word choice does not make it more interesting. Reywas92^Talk 02:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see at least four other users have also fixed this unusual writing: [2][3][4][5]. Please don't use "the subject" again. Reywas92^Talk 14:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Make that eight: [6][7][8][9]... Reywas92^Talk 14:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the entry on Paul E. Kahle, the editor 'corrected' my usage by mucking the meaning up. Warshy wrote " In 1909 the he discovered leather puppets near Damietta, Egypt used in medieval puppet drama." Not an improvement for readers. Please fix that. The personal pronoun according to most writing textbooks is a hazard when several persons are mentioned and the antecedent is unclear. That is why, on occasion, it should be used. To prevent further mucking up of Wikipedia, I will accommodate the forms you insist on. Church of the Rain (talk) 01:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Forbes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benjamin Harrison V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Morris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians interested in law and morality has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians interested in law and morality has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]