User talk:CelticJobber

Welcome!

Hello, CelticJobber, I'm Drini and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date, and use edit summaries whenever you change a page. If you have any questions, need help or assistance, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or contact me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Enjoy Wikipedia!!

-- (☺drini♫|☎) 06:22, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section

Please do not restore the removed section. Wikimedia's privacy policy would be contravened. - Amgine 21:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intensity

I fixed up Intensity and Intensity (disambiguation). For now, I have redirected the former to Intensity (physics) because unless you have changed them nearly every current link to Intensity should now point to Intensity (physics). When you finish editing all of these links, then just change the redirect destination for Intensity to Intensity (disambiguation). In general, do not "move" pages by cutting and pasting text from one to another. If you can't move the pages with the Move button, you have to request a page move with the {{move}} tag. In this case, though, a redirect is probably preferable.--Srleffler 11:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Renee griffin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Renee griffin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Dorothy lemay.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dorothy lemay.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mickie James

Regarding your revert to Mickie James - I reverted it again. The list is messy. Wikipedia:Embedded lists states lists make Wikipedia worse, not better. I integrated some of the info from the list naturally into the rest of the article, where it should be and converted the list to prose. Thanks. --Jtalledo (talk) 21:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop putting up the link about Mickie James poseing nude. Its not true one also it makes her look like a whore and three you make no mention of other wwe divas doing anything like this but Mickie James. If you have any heart stop replacing it. It is n no way true. Also you show no proof anyway other than saying here are the pictures its her. Please stop is it that important you put that about her on there. --User: 70.144.205.207 (talk) 20:34, November 29, 2006

Well even if you feel that is her why do you put it up there i mean is it your buissness to make her look bad. But ill let yu know its a shame you feel it nessicary to make it your agenda to depict her like that. And i mean maybe it was her but appently that makes her a differnt person now that she did that. But you are the only website that has shed a bad light on her so i guess its your right to do it so what ever you think is right do it.

Can you please stop posting about her posing nude and the links. This isn't suitable material for an encyclopedia. Govvy 23:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC) >> The information is not suitable, in fact you should browse to the bottom and read Privacy Policy and the Disclaimer. You are violating the terms on which you use wiki. Also, this information is not suitable and is not necessary. If she does some work for playboy you can note it but you can not link to it. But for now can you stop posting those images and references to them. Govvy 23:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD

Hi, I've fixed your AfD nomination of Alison Angel. For second nominations the convention is to create a new, second AfD page. Hope that's alright with you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My bad

Sorry I thought it was just rumors! She is nasty!! I never in a million years expected her to do that! Anyway, what I can advise you is to cite the link you gave me on the page so no one else deletes it. Sorry once again. (Fr3nZi3 03:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Texas

So instead you revert blindly everything I do, which includes several notable reviews. It seems you don't want anything negative on the page. If you want we can try combining both views but you can't just remove anything that goes against your personal opinions.--CyberGhostface 16:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trish Stratus

For one...I didn't change anything regarding her leaving. So you may need to get your sources correct

Lita

I'm sorry, but past sources have stated that Lita believes acting is not for her. And I'm sorry, I got some of the News sites mixed up. If WWE or Lita were to confirm it, that would sway me quite a bit. You can't always believe what you read on news sites. There was an incident on Randy Orton's page involving a news site. So please understand where I am coming from. Killswitch.

Your edit to "Devastation"

Hi there. I just wanted to thank you for your edit to devastation. That article was pure poop when I cleaned it and it seems I had forgotten a litle piece of stupidity along the way, hehe. Just wanted to thank you for removing whatever waste I left behind, hehehe. Dread Specter 03:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overnight Delivery

Sorry, I was about to leave you a note. Please utilize Wikiquote for quote lists. Thanks, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you would like to discuss this further, please do so at Talk:Overnight Delivery. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Clark

actually he is out, and has been for some time. ref: nndb and vueweekly. my appologies for reverting without first discussing, but there are just so many anti-gay vandals out there, sometimes i, shoot first.... --emerson7 | Talk 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chaldoran

Hi CJ - why did you revert my change to Chaldoran? The Iran geography stubs are being split by Iranian Province - as such, replacing the Iran-geo-stub with a specific one for the West Azarbaijan province is hardly vandalism! The rest of the information at the bottom of the page which was removed (which was put there in an earlier edit) simply needed to be wikified into something more encyclopaedic. Grutness...wha? 09:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

S'alright. Sometimes, though, an edit is better than a rollback - that way you know you're removing the right things! :) Grutness...wha? 11:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Leatherface_DVD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Leatherface_DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dont tell cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dont tell cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the fair use rationale for it. --CJ 19:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Glass House 2 DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Glass House 2 DVD.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale provided. --CJ 05:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Renee griffin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Renee griffin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dorothy_Lemay_Taboo_2.JPG

I have tagged Image:Dorothy_Lemay_Taboo_2.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 16:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image falls in line with the fair use rationale, as it is in line with the "for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents", I've just added that to the rationale I already thought I had made clear enough... --CJ 05:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:DLeMayin10.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DLeMayin10.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 16:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image falls in line with the fair use rationale, as it is in line with the "for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents", I've just added that to the rationale I already thought I had made clear enough... --CJ 05:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:TheCowboyWay.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TheCowboyWay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:StonedAgePoster.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:StonedAgePoster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:TrojanWar.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TrojanWar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Loose cannon dvd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Loose cannon dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:DominiquePoltergeist.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DominiquePoltergeist.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 20:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dorothy_Lemay_Taboo_2.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dorothy_Lemay_Taboo_2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:License to Drive.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:License to Drive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DominiquePoltergeist.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DominiquePoltergeist.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Angr 20:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FUR expedited request

I see you participate in WP:FUR debates. I would like to call your attention to an expedited evaluation request at Wikipedia:Fair_use_review#October_5.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Samantha Sterlyng

Samantha Sterlyng, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Samantha Sterlyng satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Sterlyng and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Samantha Sterlyng during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 05:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dont tell cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dont tell cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dahmer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dahmer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Glass House 2 DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Glass House 2 DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Seniortrip.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Seniortrip.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Texas chainsaw massacre 2 poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Texas chainsaw massacre 2 poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TrojanWar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TrojanWar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VideogamesMagazine.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VideogamesMagazine.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it's mine

mine mine mine mine!!! My page, there is no rule that says I CANNOT blank anything, so please stop bugging me about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.88.24 (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After looking more closely at Wiki policy that might be true, but it's a really annoying habit. And your constant vandalism to Wiki entries is against the rules. --Celtic Jobber (talk) 10:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

see your talk page

I left you an important message on your talk page, please write me back! Thanks Snuffereet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snuffereet (talk • contribs) 03:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is my talk page... If other people are using your account, you need to discuss it with an administrator. --Celtic Jobber (talk) 07:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry dude, I thougnt you WERE an administrator since you post warnings and such, I'll talk to one soon. Thanks! Chitpantzer (talk) 09:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All blocked

See [1] — Rlevse • Talk • 12:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Clerk note: When filing cases at SPI, please just file under user name, don't add 2nd, 3rd etc. Mayalld (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello CelticJobber! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Michael Kopelow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tracie_Spencer and User_talk:68.108.84.91

Hi there. I've noticed an edit you reverted was immediately re-done. I've checked the references, and the initial edit was correct - albeit typo'd the first time round. I'd like to point you at wp:assume good faith and wp:don't bite the newbies, especially as you issued a level 3 warning as the first warning, with no prior conversation. Yes, it might be a vandal, but AGF. Encourage them to create an account. Rich^(Contribs)/_{(Talk to me!)} I can haz review plz? 15:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:McRaven.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:McRaven.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samantha Sterlyng for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samantha Sterlyng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Sterlyng (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Savannah smiles dvd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Savannah smiles dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CelticJobber. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Delchamps.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Delchamps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CptViraj (Talk) 12:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Date with the President's Daughter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Date with the President's Daughter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Date with the President's Daughter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Filmomusico (talk) 22:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Delchamps.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Delchamps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]