Jump to content

User talk:Caesura

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You can leave a new message here.

Unless you request otherwise, I will reply to your message on your talk page, not on this page.
If you are here to reply to a message that I left you, you can do so either here or on your own talk page.
(I always add talk pages to my watchlist when I leave messages on them.)

Chinatown Square

[edit]

I am a newbie Wikipedia User and I found out that here on wikipedia, there is not an article about Chinatown Square, a huge outdoor mall situtated in Chinatown Chicago. I made an article but it is currently being edited by you. I want you to know that, I am not making an adveritisment, but just making information, just like any other general mall. I know the grammar is bad, I do not have good grammar. So please the page...

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by P95123 (talkcontribs) 16:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for fixing some of the stuff on the page I just created (Justin Azevedo), ive been mostly adding stuff to places and people around my hometown, but i do it casualy so i dont focus on grammer so thanks for fixing some of it

Mr.Deathhawk 17:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People's Computer Company

[edit]

This is to inform you that I have re-written the article so that no trace of the original copyrighted text remained. I also have taken the liberty to remove the tag you placed. Mahjongg 18:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't exactly an A7, because she had founded an organization that may be notable (?). An AFD is more appropriate, which I have started. Thanks! Jonathan (talke-mailcontribs) 19:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AirwaySim-100000000000000% Appropriate

[edit]

Airwaysim is 100% appropriate for Wikipedia! It is to be used a place where people can view what it is. It does not have any selective views and it is sourced from the actual website!

PLEASE TELL ME WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airwaysim (talkcontribs) 04:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can not find any articles on this, but wikipedia is supposed to be where you can post articles on things! There are articles on Potatoes! Are potatoes relevent ot every day life? Usually no! Their is an article on airline mogul! They are an airlinesimultion game! It is still an article that DOES help the public! their are thousands, more like hundreds of thousands of people interested in aviation and many of those are interested in a WELL developed simulation game!
I can understand that most people dont care about this, but some do! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airwaysim (talkcontribs) 05:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, if I can't find a news source for this (which their isn't) and I have a miniscule chance of changing the rules, what am I todo? Even if an article only effects 100 people, isn't enough to create an article on it?

I'm not trying to argue, but I personally think it meets the criteria. I have not expressed any personal views other than saying something about people contributing to the website, but that is a trivial item that can be deleted. I have provided enough information for the time being and sourced it with the website. I can not find a "reputable" source, such as a paper, as this site is relatively new. I have seen articels that are about airports in the middle of no where, with almost no info except for their name, yet that falls under the category of ok because it is part of civil aviation. The content in the article does not express unacceptible material (other then one speculation stated previously).

What should I do if this piece is technically missing one piece? Request for the article to be made? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airwaysim (talkcontribs) 05:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.......
I guess you win. :(
But thanks for the info..--Airwaysim 05:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sephius

[edit]

No, I was just patrolling and thought I'd help a little. I've got it on my watchlist and figured I'd give it a week before RfD but if an RfD takes a week then I guess we'd better start now. I have no knowledge of the subject at all. Padillah 16:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedy tag on User:Geomet/Geometallurgy for copyvio

[edit]

Hi

I deleted that article earlier today. The author asked for an undelete on the grounds that his company is the copyright owner. I undeleted but warned the author that they needed to confirm that they were relicensing the text under GFDL. The author responded that this should be forthcoming tomorrow (5 Dec) to to avoid once again deleting and undelelting I've moved it to their userspace pro tem. If no confirmation is forthcoming the article will be deleted. Regards Tonywalton Talk 20:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make that "copyvio tag". OK if I revert under those conditions? Tonywalton Talk 20:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. And I'll put a note of the circumstances on that article's talkpage. Cheers, Tonywalton Talk 20:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now done. If only the author had removed the speedy tag once it got to their userspace.

::Oh, all right. I should've. Tonywalton Talk 20:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for do the redirection for me!

[edit]

Hello, casura,

Thanks for your information! I really don't have too much ideas of what I shall do on edit the pages. I get some useful information here and I try to start share sth., although only a little bit.

Thanks a again! mado (talk) 14:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

[edit]

Hi there, i just deleted and re-uploaded the image 'XmasLights01.jpg' so i could rectify the copyright information.

Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DataBrain (talkcontribs) 15:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

[edit]

Your talkpage is getting a little hard to read. Have you concidered archiving some of the discussions? user:MiszaBot III is the usual suspect to help out with that, but there are others to, or you could do it manualy. Or not at all ;) Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HVHF

[edit]

HVHF is an acronym for High Velocity Human Factors (a wiki entry by the same name). I was trying to link the two together. Please help. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adyar (talkcontribs) 01:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Caesura. I'm a rookie on wiki -- my experience can be conunted in hours -- and am still learning. Thanks again for the many useful links relating to wiki tutorials. - Adyar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adyar (talkcontribs) 01:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion

[edit]

what is your problem?? if it is a copywrite infringement then why don't you just rewrite it or request it to be rewritten? You have the source right there since it is a copywrite infringement. If you need more sources why don't you just add citation needed to the article instead of totally deleting it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyril2006 (talkcontribs) 02:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I misunderstood what you replied with

[edit]

I thought that you had suggested that I use a different user name. My intention is not to introduce spam. My point is that there is a new technology which effectively replaces the COFDM technology used by other manufacturers which are referenced in the article. If it is ok to list manufacturers and products like Wolfe Coach, Motorola, Firetide, etc, why are we not able to mention our company as well?

Maybe I just don't understand the policy against commercialization. Is the mention of a new protocol which is best described by the company that created it spam? There is no solicitation to buy and the claims are verifiable by third parties. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cafedot (talkcontribs) 03:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AdvanIDe

[edit]

Hi,

I want to know the process of article submission at wikipedia about an organisation. I would request you to please visit http://www.advanide.com.

Please get in touch with me at [email protected].


Thanks & Regards, Harsh Gupta —Preceding unsigned comment added by Advanide (talkcontribs) 09:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why don't you seach wikipeda for allpoetry, please tell me what you think. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Litwriter21 (talkcontribs) 19:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with my article Mugs Media? I state why it is notable, so what is the problem? Please stop trying to delete it and approve it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfalko01 (talkcontribs) 06:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a really difficult time posting information on this website and I am starting to get very upset as I am constantly having to retype it and post it on again... You deleted my post last night on Geometallurgy...this has been taken off the SGS website and I work for the company. I have already went through this with TonyWaton(sp?). Could you please put it back as I dont have the time to re-write it and post it again...now that I know... I will add: I, Geomet, am the author of this article, Geometallurgy, and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

I am asking you kindly to please put it back on.... I really dont have the time to go through this again.... its happened over and over and its clearly just a misunderstanding as each time there is something wrong I fix it... and then something else is wrong...

Please let me know when you are going to re port it... this is very urgent as my manager is waiting to see this today...thank you kindly.

Geomet (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am so confused? can you please outline exactly what I need to do to have this information on the site? Yes the website is mine... I work for SGS in the marketing dept. It is our material.... What exactly do i need to do? I appreciate you help... I really need to get this done...if you could let me know as soon as possible... thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geomet (talkcontribs) 14:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i cant just remove that off our international website though.....

I understand that the material on Wiki can be edited.... but I am giving permission for our material on this website to be edited....

However... that material on our webite is still copyrighted and no one else can use it except for us...

if you look at the past comments by Tony Waton... he said that all i had to do was give permission and how him i was from SGS (i sent him an email with my sgs address) and he said that would be fine...please look at the past comments... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geomet (talkcontribs) 14:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i forgot to sign the last one there..... Geomet (talk) 14:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really need to get this cleared up as soon as possible... i never thought it would be so hard to post something on this site...

did you get my last message??? I said I forgot to put Geomet (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC) at the end of it... Geomet (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...okay thanks your message was so helpful.... however now when I follow the link to post my information... it doesnt come up when i search for it... its says geometallurgy doesnt exist on the site??... do you know why this is?? i copy and pasted the statement on the talk page :

I, User:Geomet, have been authorized by my employer, SGS, to release this material under the GNU Free Documentation License. To confirm my employment status, I have sent a message from my SGS account to User:Tonywalton, an administrator, who will vouch for this.


But my article is no where to be found....I know this is going to be long... but this is what I need to paste (see below for long article)

any ideas?? Thanks I appreciate your help so much!!

Geomet (talk) 15:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i did what you told me to do and someone still deleted it: Oxymoron83

Do you guys communiate with each other because everytime I get instructions from someone i follow them and then someone else deletes it on me?? i really dont have the time to keep doing this.. however it needs to be put on as my manager as requested it... to raise awareness about the topic... why is this happening and what can i do to prevent this? thanks Geomet (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did paste it at that link though... and its not appearing... after it wasnt appearing, I pasted it on your page to show you what I am trying to put on the link you provided... every time i paste it on the link you provided its not there...:( Ahhh...

Geomet (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help! You have been most helpful!!! I appreciate it!


Geomet (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ocean Raton

[edit]

I have revised what you deemed advertising of the novel Ocean Raton. I modeled the entry after acceptable content I find on Wikipedia such as "Nature Girl" by Carl Hiaasen and "Florida Roadkill" by Tim Dorsey. I trust my edits are now in-line with guidelines - please advise if further action on my part is required. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnm006 (talkcontribs) 01:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Article for speedy deletion

[edit]

erm, why would you want an article in its infancy to be deleted!? go to the Talk:Testicular_Elephantiasis page first. also why did you pick the username Caesura? (Wiki332 (talk) 03:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Royal Canadian Mint.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Royal Canadian Mint.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Asbury College.svg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Asbury College.svg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caesura, I have taken care of adding the fair use rationale for this logo (I had to do the same thing for Asbury Theological Seminary. Thanks for the image. Brbigam (talk) 14:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Macalester College.svg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Activision.svg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Activision.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My revert ..

[edit]

No problem! I was about to warn you when I saw your contribs history and realised what had probably happened. Philip Trueman (talk) 17:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Curriculum vitae

[edit]

I have started a move discussion about CV, Curriculum vitae and Résumé. You have previously participated in this topic, and I would like your input in this discussion if you are still interested. John Vandenberg (chat) 01:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Positive definiteness

[edit]

Your comments are requested on a discussion about whether or not a particular page is a disambiguation page or a stub here. Neelix (talk) 20:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You uploaded a logo for Asbury College in 2005. On May 5, 2010, Asbury College became Asbury University, hence a new logo is needed. Could you update the logo for Asbury University's wikipedia entry (I can send you the png if needed)?

Asbury Web (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asbury College.svg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asbury College.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Outcast.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Outcast.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus on dashes

[edit]

Hi, this is to let everyone who has expressed an interest in the topic that the discussion to arrive at a consensus has been opened at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/dash drafting, with discussion taking place at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/dash_drafting/discussion. Apologies if you have already commented there, or have seen the discussion and chosen not to comment. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:C-SPAN.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:C-SPAN.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:F-19 Stealth Fighter.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:F-19 Stealth Fighter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intervocalic alveolar flapping

[edit]

Hey, on the reasoning for your recent move of Intervocalic alveolar-flapping to Intervocalic alveolar flapping, I don't buy the analysis that alveolar is an adjective modifying flapping, making the phrase flapping at an alveolar place of articulation. Rather, I see alveolar flapping as a compound, equivalent to flapping of alveolar consonants (meaning changing of the alveolar consonants' manner of articulation). Alveolar is a noun modifying flapping, not an adjective.

Anyway, this is just a response to the reasoning for your move. Your move is okay even if your reasoning is wrong, since whether compound nouns use hyphens or not is a matter of style. I don't care enough about which style should be used here to move the article back, so you're free to ignore this comment if you aren't interested in the syntax of the phrase. — Eru·tuon 04:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Than you!

[edit]

Thanks for reverting my foolishness. I installed a software for typing Indian languages and it had its hot key as ctrl+⇧ Shift which I accidentally clicked while making that edit. Thank you for catching it immediately and hope you have a great day. :) ···Vanischenu「m/Talk」 18:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anne X. Alpern article

[edit]

Thank you for writing an article about Anne Alpern. I processed her papers in 2006 and I had thought about writing a Wikipedia article about her but never got around to it. 65.129.93.14 (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bethel College Logo.svg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bethel College Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Caesura. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Caesura. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Online Encylopaedia of Mathematics" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Online Encylopaedia of Mathematics. Since you had some involvement with the Online Encylopaedia of Mathematics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 15:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Online Encylopaedia of Mathematics" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Online Encylopaedia of Mathematics. Since you had some involvement with the Online Encylopaedia of Mathematics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Macalester College.svg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Macalester College.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]