User talk:Brycelpro89

September 2022

Hello, I'm Andrevan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sedro-Woolley, Washington have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Andre🚐 02:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hey andrevan I was born in Sedro Woolley 33 years ago nd recently moved back Hals is as big a cultural atraction here as the loggerodeo or as dicks in seattle can you please put it back Brycelpro89 (talk) 02:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I lived here for 27 years before i left too Brycelpro89 (talk) 02:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Andrevan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andre🚐 02:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok Im new to the whole thing and didnt know to add a citation ill do that thanks for the help! Brycelpro89 (talk) 02:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Andre🚐 02:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I put it back in with this citation, if its not enough just delete it and let me know thank you https://www.king5.com/article/news/skagit-valley-burgers/281-9febe6da-4853-4ee5-b3b8-372ab17f71b1 Brycelpro89 (talk) 02:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of militia organizations in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello Doug weller

I am sorry you feel that way but if you check the sources or type in google New Mexico Civil Gaurd you will see this is a very large militia group operating in New Mexico with more media attention then most of the groups cited in there and it behooves the public to know about these people as they have been running around for yers there and on the news almost monthly Brycelpro89 (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to wikepedia and trying to add something that seems over looked by the editor of that page if you would like more links let me send them to you now

aw.georgetown.edu/icap/our-work/addressing-the-rise-of-unlawful-private-militias/state-v-new-mexico-civil-guard/

https://www.lcsun-news.com/story/news/local/new-mexico/2022/04/17/new-mexico-civil-guard-founder-bryce-provance-sits-deposition-da-raul-torrez/7281277001/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/15/facebook-new-mexico-civil-guard/

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/06/886586653/new-mexico-leaders-to-militia-if-you-want-to-help-community-stop-showing-up-arme

https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/14/us/new-mexico-militia-group-lawsuit/index.html

theres a ton of these articles on these people and from CNN NPR Fox News every major outlet in new mexico

and I tried to write my edit in a totaly unbiased way Brycelpro89 (talk) 14:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read your sources. How many of them spell guard "gaurd"? You reverted my spelling correction to the same error. Doug Weller talk 15:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I always spell guard wrong I dint mean to do that.How do you get your page submissions along quicker? Brycelpro89 (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once I rewrite it I'll move it to article space. You will still show up as the article's creator. Doug Weller talk 16:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hey thanks so much! Brycelpro89 (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Micronation, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 14:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello dr kay what exactly is personal analysis? I am new to this and wanted to add the confederted empire principality of the northern forrests and commonwealth of Dracul as all these nations are quite notable in the micronational community and they are not even mentioned they have all gained lands buisnesses and currenxcies and governments and are making huge strides twords independence and all that is on the page is mostly nations from 20 to 30 years ago. Brycelpro89 (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also im sure the older people who madethe first encyclopedia were upset when their articles got added to but things change and powers rise and fall should I add a section that says modern active micronations? Brycelpro89 (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:No original research, you need to provide a reliable independent secondary source that explicitly supports the content. The content is not notable if it is not covered by independent secondary sources and is not verifiable unless the content is found in those sources without any need for synthesis. DrKay (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

would these two work see i was adding them when u deleted also the founder of that micronation is quite infamous as the articles on him I cited show.

https://montediszamble.co/

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Micronations/List_of_already_existing_micronations/The_Confederated_Empire_of_Bir_Tawil_and_Territories Brycelpro89 (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. The first is a primary source and the second is a wiki and a wikipedia mirror. This is not acceptable per Wikipedia:no original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources, and Wikipedia:Verifiability#Wikipedia and sources that mirror or use it. There are also Wikipedia:Conflict of interest concerns. DrKay (talk) 15:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok I thought that was another part of wikipedia, ill do some more reserch. Do you think adding a section called current micronations would be a good one. Because some of these places are actively seeking independence nd the notion has kind of moved from the internet realm of the early 2000s to a more concrete we want independence stance of these groups? Brycelpro89 (talk) 15:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

here is another sourse do you believe this will work. I am going to put the article back up and site this and see if I can find some on the others I mentioned.

https://spotherld.com/an-empire-music-books-and-militias/ Brycelpro89 (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say no. Doug Weller talk 11:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Brycelpro89. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It seems you may have a conflict of interest with the New Mexico Civil Guard. What is your connection to that group? Netherzone (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was at a couple protests they showed up at and am currently documenting militias and other things, im working on a book about micronations and one on the rise of militias during 2020. Subjects not many are covering but that are very pertinent today Brycelpro89 (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard. Thanks! Naraht (talk) 17:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Mexico Civil Guard (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brycelpro89! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! _Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Mexico Civil Guard (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While I am fairly certain that this topic clears the general notability guidelines, there are tonal issues that incline me towards declining this submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 18:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NMCG Article tone

Can you please help me by identifying sentences not in the correct tone because I was trying to do objective reporting taking neither side 174.214.16.173 (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Brycelpro89! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Pbritti (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Mexico Civil Guard (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The two cited sources at the very bottom need to be removed as they are duplicate of some of the previous inline citations. The overall tone is still very subjective, with problematic phrases like "national infamy" and excessively long run-on sentences. Although not grammatically incorrect, having most sentences starts with "they" seems a weird writing choice. Some of the contents, such as "They were sued by the state of New Mexico" and "The group was recently ruled against in the New Mexico Supreme court after lengthy court battle where even facebook was subpeonad", need more clarifications.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Mexico Civil Guard

Hello, Brycelpro89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New Mexico Civil Guard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]